Advertisement

Performance and Political Support

  • Kjetil DuvoldEmail author
  • Sten Berglund
  • Joakim Ekman
Chapter

Abstract

Chapter  4 presents an analysis of how Baltic people evaluate the performance of their respective political systems. The focus is thus on the evaluative dimension of political culture: do people get what they expect from their governments; and if not, what are the implications for system support and democratic stability in the region? It starts with a conceptual discussion about political culture and public support. It continues with an overview of performance-related public attitudes in the three Baltic countries, looking at ethnic differences as well as cross-national and longitudinal patterns. In the third part, a fourfold typology for classification of different political subcultures is introduced before the question of system support is discussed in light of democratic stability.

References

  1. Adcock, R., & Collier, D. (2001). Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research. American Political Science Review, 95(3), 526–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almond, G., & Powell, G. B. (1978). Comparative Politics. System, Process, and Policy. Glenview: Scott, Foresman & Company.Google Scholar
  3. Almond, G., & Verba, S. (1963). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Almond, G., & Verba, S. (Eds.). (1980). The Civic Culture Revisited: An Analytical Study. Little, Brown & Company: Boston & Toronto.Google Scholar
  5. Amnå, E., & Ekman, J. (2014). Standby Citizens: Diverse Faces of Political Passivity. European Political Science Review, 1–21.Google Scholar
  6. Carpini, D. M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. Yale: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Conradt, D. (1980). Changing German Political Culture. In G. Almond & S. Verba (Eds.), The Civic Culture Revisited: An Analytical Study. Boston & Toronto: Little, Brown & Company.Google Scholar
  8. Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Denk, T., & Christensen, H. S. (2016). How to Classify Political Cultures: A Comparison of Three Methods of Classification. Quality and Quantity, 50, 177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Denk, T., Christensen, H. S., & Berg, D. (2015). The Composition of Political Culture: A Study of 25 European Democracies. Studies in Comparative International Development, 50, 358–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diamond, L. (1999). Developing Democracy: Towards Consolidation. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Duvold, K. (2006). Making Sense of Baltic Democracy. Örebro University, Örebro Studies in Political Science.Google Scholar
  13. Easton, D. (1965). A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York, London and Sydney: John Wiley and Sons Inc.Google Scholar
  14. Easton, D. (1975). A Re-assessment of the Concept of Political Support. British Journal of Political Science, 5(4), 435–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ehin, P. (2007). Political Support in the Baltic States, 1993–2004. Journal of Baltic Studies, 38(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ekman, J. (2001). National Identity in Divided and Unified Germany. Örebro University, Örebro Studies in Political Science.Google Scholar
  17. Ekman, J., Duvold, K., & Berglund, S. (2014). Baltic Barometer. Huddinge: Södertörn University.Google Scholar
  18. Fuchs, D., & Roller, E. (1998). Cultural Conditions of the Transition to Liberal Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe. In S. H. Barnes & J. Simon (Eds.), The Postcommunist Citizen. Budapest: Erasmus Foundation/Institute for Political Science of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  19. Fuchs, D., Guidorossi, G., & Svensson, P. (1995). Political Attitudes and Political Behavior. In M. Kaase & K. Newton (Eds.), Beliefs in Government (Vol. 5). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gerner, K., & Hedlund, S. (1993). The Baltic States and the End of the Soviet Empire. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Hardin, R. (1991). Trusting Persons, Trusting Institutions. In R. J. Zeckhauser (Ed.), The Strategy of Choice (pp. 185–209). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hay, C. (2007). Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth Democracy – Americans’ Beliefs About How Government Should Work. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Inglehart, R. (1977). The Silent Revolution. Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Chance in 43 Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Inglehart, R. F., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jurkynas, M. (2011). Lithuania. In Political State of the Region Report. Copenhagen: Baltic Development Forum.Google Scholar
  28. Kitschelt, H. (1995). Formation of Party Cleavages in Post-Communist Democracies: Theoretical Propositions. Party Politics, 1(4), 447–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Klein, A., Ozolina, Z., & Rostoks, T. (2011). Latvia. In Political State of the Region Report. Copenhagen: Baltic Development Forum.Google Scholar
  30. Klingemann, H. D. (1999). Mapping Political Support in the 1990s: A Global Analysis. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government (pp. 31–56). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lagerspetz, M., & Vogt, H. (2013). Estonia. In S. Berglund, J. Ekman, K. D. Krause, & T. Knutsen (Eds.), The Handbook of Political Change in Eastern Europe (3rd ed.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  32. Laitin, D. (1995). The Civic Culture at 30. American Political Science Review, 89, 168–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Linde, J., & Ekman, J. (2003). Satisfaction with democracy: A Note on a Frequently Used Indicator in Comparative Politics. European Journal of Political Research, 42(3), 391–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Linz, J., & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Lühiste, K. (2008). Support for Strongman Rule in Ethnically Divided Societies: Evidence from Estonia and Latvia. Democratization, 15(2), 297–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lühiste, K. (2013). Regime Support in European Democracies. Tartu: University of Tartu.Google Scholar
  37. Mattes, R., & Bratton, M. (2007). Learning About Democracy in Africa: Awareness, Performance, and Experience. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 191–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nations in Transit. (2018). Retrieved from www.freedomhouese.org.
  39. Neller, K. (2006). DDR-Nostalgie. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  40. New Baltic Barometer. (2004). Centre for the Study of Public Policy. University of Strathclyde.Google Scholar
  41. Noelle-Neumann, E., & Köcher, R. (Eds.). (1997). Allensbacher Jahrbuch der Demoskopie 1993–1997. Allensbach am Bodensee/München: Verlag für Demoskopie/K.G. Saur.Google Scholar
  42. Norris, P. (1999). Critical Citizens Global Support for Democratic Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Norris, P. (2011). Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pettai, V. (2007). Studying Political Culture in Post-Communist Europe. In M.-B. Schartau, S. Berglund, & B. Henningsen (Eds.), Political Culture: Values and Identities in the Baltic Sea Region. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar
  45. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making Democracy Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Rose, R. (2005). Insiders and Outsiders: New Europe Barometer 2004. Studies in Public Policy 404, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow: Centre for the Study of Public Policy.Google Scholar
  47. Rose, R., Mishler, W., & Haerpfer, C. (1998). Democracy and Its Alternatives: Understanding Post-Communist Societies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Stoker, G. (2006). Why Politics Matters: Making Democracy Work. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  49. Stokes, D. E. (1962). Popular Evaluations of Government: An Empirical Assessment. In H. Cleveland & H. D. Lasswell (Eds.), Ethics and Bigness (pp. 61–72). New York: Kraus Reprint Company.Google Scholar
  50. Taggart, P., & Szczerbiak, A. (2002). The Party Politics of Euroscepticism in EU Member and Candidate States. Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Workshops, Turin, March 21–27, 2002.Google Scholar
  51. World Bank. (2018). Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org.
  52. World Migration Report. (2018). Retrieved from www.iom.int.
  53. Zvidriņš, P., & Berziņš, A. (2014). Demographic Development in the Baltic Sea Region. In Political State of the Region 2014. Copenhagen: Baltic Development Forum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dalarna UniversityFalunSweden
  2. 2.Örebro UniversityÖrebroSweden
  3. 3.Södertörn UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations