Advertisement

Conclusions

  • Vegard ByeEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Studies of the Americas book series (STAM)

Abstract

The overall response to the question about a causality relationship between economic reforms and political transformations is that Cuba during the first seven to eight years of the Raúl Castro decade was moving towards more economic pluralism with a certain effect also on political pluralism (and perhaps even vice versa). During the latest two to three years of the Raúl Castro era and the first subsequent year, however, economic as well as political reforms have been reversed, in an apparent effort to avoid further slides towards market economy and a less authoritarian political system. There has been no confidence in the capacity to copy the Sino-Vietnamese model of market reforms with maintenance of total political control. Rather, the mechanisms undermining the USSR are seen as the ultimate threat. This worry for deeper reforms has resulted in a failure to achieve what were probably the two major goals of the Raúl Castro reform era: increase in food self-sufficiency, and an improved economic performance to provide people with sustainable livelihoods; that is, the rehabilitation of the Cuban welfare state. The era is ending with the worst economic and social crisis since the 1990s. A new president almost unknown to ordinary Cubans when he took over, watching the disintegration of the all-inclusive social and political pact of the Revolution, will in this situation have a hard time building a proper legitimate power basis.

Keywords

Counter-reform Ideological resistance Symbiotic interdependence Savage capitalism Pragmatic acceptance Autism syndrome Change agents Transformative change 

Bibliography

  1. Bessette, Joseph M. 1980. Deliberative Democracy: The Majority Principle in Republican Government. In How Democratic Is the Constitution? ed. R.A. Goldwin and W.A. Schambra. Washington and London: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
  2. Castro Ruz, Raúl. 2016. Informe Central al 7mo Congreso del Partido Comunista de Cuba. Downloaded 17.04.16. http://www.cubadebate.cu/noticias/2016/04/17/informe-central-al-vii-congreso-del-partido-comunista-cuba/#.WhPu77bBKog.
  3. Fukuyama, Francis. 2014. Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  4. Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Linz, Juan J., and Alfred Stepan. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Moene, Kalle. 2016. Social Equity as a Development Model. In Reinventing Social Democratic Development: Insights from Indian and Scandinavian Comparisons, Nordic Institute of Asian Studies, Studies in Asian Topics, no. 58, ed. Olle Törnquist and John Harriss. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.Google Scholar
  7. Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Törnquist, Olle, and John Harriss, eds. 2016. Reinventing Social Democratic Development: Insights from Indian and Scandinavian Comparisons. Nordic Institute of Asian Studies, Studies in Asian Topics, No. 58. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.Google Scholar
  9. Whitehead, Laurence. 2009. Losing the Force? The ‘Dark Side’ of Democratization After Iraq. Democratization 16 (2, Apr.): 215–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Scanteam a.s.OsloNorway

Personalised recommendations