Advertisement

Breast

  • Andrea Hernandez
  • Tamar C. Brandler
  • Joan F. CangiarellaEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter is written for pathology residents, cytopathology fellows, cytotechnologists, and cytopathologists as a resource during rapid on-site assessment of benign or malignant breast lesions. This chapter is intended to provide the reader with key points in order to create differential diagnoses when characteristic cytologic features are seen on fine-needle aspiration smears. Key cytologic features along with clinical and radiologic information are presented, with potential pitfalls and tips as an important resource during on-site evaluation and triaging of these lesions.

Keywords

Fine-needle aspiration Breast Papillary Mucin Stroma Foam cells 

References

  1. 1.
    Nasuti JF, Gupta PK, Baloch ZW. Diagnostic value and cost-effectiveness of on-site evaluation of fine-needle aspiration specimens: review of 5,688 cases. Diagn Cytopathol. 2002;27(1):1–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sakuma T, Mimura A, Tanigawa N, Takamizu R, Morishima H, Matsunami N. Rapid on-site cytologic examination of 1500 breast lesions using the modified Shorr’s stain. Breast Cancer (Tokyo, Japan). 2015;22(3):280–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kocjan G, Bourgain C, Fassina A, Hagmar B, Herbert A, Kapila K, et al. The role of breast FNAC in diagnosis and clinical management: a survey of current practice. Cytopathology. 2008;19(5):271–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Layfield LJ, Mooney EE, Glasgow B, Hirschowitz S, Coogan A. What constitutes an adequate smear in fine-needle aspiration cytology of the breast? Cancer. 1997;81(1):16–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    The uniform approach to breast fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Am J Surg. 1997;174(4):371–85.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stanley MW, Abele J, Kline T, Silverman JF, Skoog L. What constitutes adequate sampling of palpable breast lesions that appear benign by clinical and mammographic criteria? Diagn Cytopathol. 1995;13(5):473–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Roberts JC, Rainsbury RM. ‘Tactile sensation’: a new clinical sign during fine needle aspiration of breast lumps. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994;76(2):136–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hermansen C, Skovgaard Poulsen H, Jensen J, Langfeldt B, Steenskov V, Frederiksen P, et al. Diagnostic reliability of combined physical examination, mammography, and fine-needle puncture (“triple-test”) in breast tumors. A prospective study. Cancer. 1987;60(8):1866–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Abati A, Simsir A. Breast fine needle aspiration biopsy: prevailing recommendations and contemporary practices. Clin Lab Med. 2005;25(4):631–54, v.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Abele J, Stanley MW, Rollins SD, Miller TR. What constitutes an adequate smear in fine-needle aspiration cytology of the breast? Cancer. 1998;84(1):57–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Howell LP, Gandour-Edwards R, Folkins K, Davis R, Yasmeen S, Afify A. Adequacy evaluation of fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the breast health clinic setting. Cancer. 2004;102(5):295–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smith DN, Kaelin CM, Korbin CD, Ko W, Meyer JE, Carter GR. Impalpable breast cysts: utility of cytologic examination of fluid obtained with radiologically guided aspiration. Radiology. 1997;204(1):149–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Onoue S, Katoh T, Chigira H, Matsuo K, Suzuki M, Shibata Y, et al. A case of apocrine carcinoma of the breast presenting as two cysts. Breast Cancer (Tokyo, Japan). 1997;4(3):193–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Agarwal C, Pujani M, Sharma N, Rana D, Prajapati D. Apocrine carcinoma of breast: a rare entity posing cytological challenge. Diagn Cytopathol. 2017;45(12):1156–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kerridge WD, Kryvenko ON, Thompson A, Shah BA. Fat necrosis of the breast: a pictorial review of the mammographic, ultrasound, CT, and MRI findings with Histopathologic correlation. Radiol Res Pract. 2015;2015:613139.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Irshad A, Pope TL, Ackerman SJ, Panzegrau B. Characterization of sonographic and mammographic features of granular cell tumors of the breast and estimation of their incidence. J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27(3):467–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cangiarella J, Simsir A, Tabbara SO, editors. Breast cytohistology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013. (Cytohistology of Small Tissue Samples).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Barbara S, Ducatman HW. Breast. In: Cibas ES, editor. Cytology: diagnostic principles and clinical correlates. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2014. p. 233–65.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pieterse AS, Mahar A, Orell S. Granular cell tumour: a pitfall in FNA cytology of breast lesions. Pathology. 2004;36(1):58–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Malzone MG, Campanile AC, Gioioso A, Fucito A, D’Aiuto G, Botti G, et al. Silicone lymphadenopathy: presentation of a further case containing asteroid bodies on fine-needle cytology sample. Diagn Cytopathol. 2015;43(1):57–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cangiarella J, Simsir A. Breast. In: Svante R, Orell GS, editors. Orell and Sterrett’s fine needle aspiration cytology. 5th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2012. p. 156–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ng WK, Kong JH. Significance of squamous cells in fine needle aspiration cytology of the breast. A review of cases in a seven-year period. Acta Cytol. 2003;47(1):27–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    DeMay R. Practical principles of cytopathology. 1st ed. Chicago: American Society for Clinical Pathology; 2007. p. 420.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schmitt F, Gerhard R, Stanley DE, Domanski HA. Breast. In: Domanski HA, editor. Atlas of fine needle aspiration cytology. 2014th ed. London: Springer; 2013.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fung AD, Collins JA, Campassi C, Ioffe OB, Staats PN. Performance characteristics of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of axillary lymph nodes for metastatic breast cancer employing rapid on-site evaluation of adequacy: analysis of 136 cases and review of the literature. Cancer Cytopathol. 2014;122(4):282–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    O’Leary DP, O’Brien O, Relihan N, McCarthy J, Ryan M, Barry J, et al. Rapid on-site evaluation of axillary fine-needle aspiration cytology in breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2012;99(6):807–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Alvarez S, Anorbe E, Alcorta P, Lopez F, Alonso I, Cortes J. Role of sonography in the diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer: a systematic review. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186(5):1342–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Topps A, Clay V, Absar M, Howe M, Lim Y, Johnson R, et al. The sensitivity of pre-operative axillary staging in breast cancer: comparison of invasive lobular and ductal carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014;40(7):813–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Prathiba D, Rao S, Kshitija K, Joseph LD. Papillary lesions of breast – an introspect of cytomorphological features. J Cytol. 2010;27(1):12–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nayar R, De Frias DV, Bourtsos EP, Sutton V, Bedrossian C. Cytologic differential diagnosis of papillary pattern in breast aspirates: correlation with histology. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2001;5(1):34–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Simsir A, Waisman J, Thorner K, Cangiarella J. Mammary lesions diagnosed as “papillary” by aspiration biopsy: 70 cases with follow-up. Cancer. 2003;99(3):156–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Simsir A, Cangiarella J. Challenging breast lesions: pitfalls and limitations of fine-needle aspiration and the role of core biopsy in specific lesions. Diagn Cytopathol. 2012;40(3):262–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jeffrey PB, Ljung BM. Benign and malignant papillary lesions of the breast. A cytomorphologic study. Am J Clin Pathol. 1994;101(4):500–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kobayashi TK, Ueda M, Nishino T, Watanabe S, Yakushiji M. Spontaneous infarction of an intraductal papilloma of the breast: cytological presentation on fine needle aspiration. Cytopathology. 1992;3(6):379–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dawson AE, Mulford DK. Fine needle aspiration of mucinous (colloid) breast carcinoma. Nuclear grading and mammographic and cytologic findings. Acta Cytol. 1998;42(3):668–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Renshaw AA. Can mucinous lesions of the breast be reliably diagnosed by core needle biopsy? Am J Clin Pathol. 2002;118(1):82–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ly A, Kong CS. Fine needle aspiration cytology. In: Kristen A, Atkins CK, editors. Practical breast pathology: a diagnostic approach E-book: a volume in the pattern recognition series. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2012. p. 254–77.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Simsir A, Tsang P, Greenebaum E. Additional mimics of mucinous mammary carcinoma: fibroepithelial lesions. Am J Clin Pathol. 1998;109(2):169–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ventura K, Cangiarella J, Lee I, Moreira A, Waisman J, Simsir A. Aspiration biopsy of mammary lesions with abundant extracellular mucinous material. Review of 43 cases with surgical follow-up. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003;120(2):194–202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wong NL, Wan SK. Comparative cytology of mucocelelike lesion and mucinous carcinoma of the breast in fine needle aspiration. Acta Cytol. 2000;44(5):765–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Begum SM, Jara-Lazaro AR, Thike AA, Tse GM, Wong JS, Ho JT, et al. Mucin extravasation in breast core biopsies–clinical significance and outcome correlation. Histopathology. 2009;55(5):609–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Chhieng DC, Cangiarella JF, Waisman J, Fernandez G, Cohen JM. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of spindle cell lesions of the breast. Cancer. 1999;87(6):359–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Dejmek A, Lindholm K. Frequency of cytologic features in fine needle aspirates from histologically and cytologically diagnosed fibroadenomas. Acta Cytol. 1991;35(6):695–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Maritz RM, Michelow PM. Cytological criteria to distinguish Phyllodes tumour of the breast from Fibroadenoma. Acta Cytol. 2017;61(6):418–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sencha AN, Evseeva EV, Mogutov MS, Patrunov Y. Breast ultrasound. 2013th ed. Berlin: Springer; 2013. p. 258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Masood S, Rosa M. Cytopathology of the breast. In: Gattuso P, Reddy VB, Masood S, editors. Differential diagnosis in cytopathology. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. p. 760.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea Hernandez
    • 1
  • Tamar C. Brandler
    • 1
  • Joan F. Cangiarella
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of PathologyNew York University Langone HealthNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations