Advertisement

Influence of the Choice of a Geomagnetic Polarity Time Scale on Results of the Geochronological and Geohistorical Analysis of the Marine Magnetic Anomalies

  • Sergei A. MerkuryevEmail author
  • Sergei A. Ivanov
  • Charles DeMets
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences book series (SPEES)

Abstract

Based on the Vine-Matthews hypothesis, dozens of magnetic reversal time scales have been constructed over the past 50 years, covering the Cenozoic and part of the Mesozoic eras. Using these time scales, marine magnetic anomalies have been identified, the grids of ocean floor ages have been constructed, and plate rotation parameters have been estimated from reconstructions of the edges of magnetic isochrons. Here, we study how the choice of a geomagnetic time scale influences geochronological and geohistorical interpretations of magnetic anomalies using well-mapped marine magnetic anomalies from the Indian Ocean. For the analysis, 15 of the most widely used Cenozoic time scales were chosen. For chrons C1–C5 and C23–C26, we quantify the degree of influence of the reversal time scales on the geohistorical and kinematic analysis.

Keywords

Magnetic field Paleomagnetism Earth’s magnetic field reversals Geomagnetic time scale Marine magnetic anomalies 

Notes

Acknowledgements

In preparing the drawings, the GMT software package [31] was used.

We are grateful to Prof. A. L. Piskarev for critically reading the manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Karasik, A.M.: Magnetic anomalies of the ocean and the ocean floor spreading hypothesis. Geotectonika 2, 3–18 (1971) (in Russian)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Heirtzler, J.R.: The paleomagnetic field as inferred from marine magnetic studies. J. Geomag. Geoelectr. 22(1–2), 197–211 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shreyder, A.A.: Chronology of linear marine magnetic anomalies. Izvestiya Phys. Solid Earth 29(4), 305–319 (1993)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mead, G.A.: Correlation of Cenozoic-late cretaceous geomagnetic polarity time scales: an internet archive. J. Geophys. Res. 101(B4), 8107–8110 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heirtzler, J.R., Dickson, G.O., Herron, E.M., Pitman III, W.C., Le Pichon, X.: Marine magnetic anomalies, geomagnetic field reversals, and motions of the ocean floor and continents. J. Geophys. Res. 73(6), 2119–2136 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tarling, D.H., Mitchell, J.G.: Revised Cenozoic polarity time scale. Geology 4(3), 133–136 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    LaBrecque, J.L., Kent, D.V., Cande, S.C.: Revised magnetic polarity time scale for Late cretaceous and cenozoic time. Geology 5(6), 330–335 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mankinen, E.A., Dalrymple, G.B.: Revised geomagnetic polarity time scale for the interval 0–5 m.y. B.P. J. Geophys. Res. 84(B2), 615–626 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ness, G., Levi, S., Couch, R.: Marine magnetic anomaly time scales for the Cenozoic and Late Cretaceous: a Precis, critique, and synthesis. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 18(4), 753–770 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lowrie, W., Alvarez, W.: One hundred million years of geomagnetic polarity history. Geology 9(9), 392–397 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harland, W.B., Cox, A.V., Llewellyn, P.G., Pickton, C.A.G., Smith, A.G., Walters, R.: A Geologic Time Scale, 131 pp. Cambridge University Press (1982)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Berggren, W.A., Kent, D.V., Flynn, J.J., Van Couvering, J.A.: Cenozoic geochronology. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 96(11), 1499–1510 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kent, D.V., Gradstein, F.M.: A Jurassic to recent chronology. In: Vogt, P., Tucholke, B.E. (eds.) The Western North Atlantic Region, vol. M, pp. 45–50, Boulder, CO, Geological Society of America, The Geology of North America (1986)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harland, W.B., Armstrong, R.L., Cox, A.V., Craig, L.E., Smith, A.G., Smith, D.G.: A Geologic Time Scale 1989, 263 pp. Cambridge University Press (1990)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cande, S.C., Kent, D.V.: A new geomagnetic polarity time scale for the Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic. J. Geophys. Res. 97(B10), 13917–13951 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cande, S.C., Kent, D.V.: Revised calibration of the geomagnetic polarity time scale for the Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic. J. Geophys. Res. 100(B4), 6093–6095 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Berggren, W.A., Kent, D.V., Swisher III, C.C., Aubry, M.-P.: A revised cenozoic gochronology and chronostratigraphy. In: Berggren, W.A., Kent, D.V., Aubry, M.-P., Hardenbol, J. (eds.) Geochronology time scales and global stratigraphic correlation, pp. 129–212. SEPM, Tulsa, Oklahoma (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Huestis, S.P., Acton, G.D.: On the construction of geomagnetic timescales from non-prejudicial treatment of magnetic anomaly data from multiple ridges. Geophys. J. Int. 129, 176–182 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gradstein, F.M., Ogg, J.G., Schmitz, M., Ogg, G.: The Geologic Time Scale 2012, 1144 pp. Boston, Elsevier (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cox, A.: Geomagnetic reversals. Science 163, 237–245 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gordin, V.M.: Selected Works and Memories, 138 pp. IFZ RAN (2007) (in Russian)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cande, S.C., LaBrecque, J.L.: Behavior of the Earth’s paleomagnetic field from small scale marine magnetic anomalies. Nature 247, 26–28 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Agrinier, P., Gallet, Y., Lewin, E.: On the age calibration of the geomagnetic polarity time scale. Geophys. J. Int. 137, 81–90 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Malinverno, A., Hildebrandt, J., Tominaga, M., Channell, J.E.T.: M-sequence geomagnetic polarity time scale (MHTC12) that steadies global spreading rates and incorporates astrochronology constraints. J. Geophys. Res. 117(B6), B06104 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jb009260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    De Vleeschouwer, D., Parnell, A.C.: Reducing time-scale uncertainty for the Devonian by integrating astrochronology and Bayesian statistics. Geology 42, 491–494 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Merkouriev, S., DeMets, C.: Constraints on Indian plate motion since 20 Ma from dense Russian magnetic data: implications for Indian plate dynamics. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 7, Q02002 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1029/2005gc001079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Seton, M., et al.: Community infrastructure and repository for marine magnetic identifications. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 15, 1629–1641 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wilson, D.S.: Confirmation of the astronomical calibration of the magnetic polarity timescale from sea-floor spreading rates. Nature 364, 788–790 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ivanov, S.A., Merkuriev, S.A.: Preliminary results of the geohistorical and paleomagnetic analysis of marine magnetic anomalies in the Northwestern Indian Ocean. In: Nurgaliev, D., Shcherbakov, V., Kosterov A., Spassov, S., (eds.) Recent Advances in Rock Magnetism, Environmental Magnetism and Paleomagnetism, pp. 479–490. Springer, Cham (2019)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lourens, L., Hilgen, F.J., Laskar, J., Shackleton, N.J., Wilson, D.: The neogene period. In: Gradstein, F., Ogg, J., Smith, A. (eds.) A Geologic Time Scale 2004, pp. 409–440. Cambridge University Press, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wessel, P., Smith, W.H.F.: Free software helps map and display data. Eos Trans. AGU 72, 441–446 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sergei A. Merkuryev
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Sergei A. Ivanov
    • 1
  • Charles DeMets
    • 3
  1. 1.Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism of the Russian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Institute of Earth Sciences, Saint Petersburg State UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia
  3. 3.Department of GeoscienceUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations