Advertisement

Dispositifs at Play: Artist’s Moving Image in the Gallery

  • Ella Barclay
  • Alex MuntEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Artists’ moving image work today occupies a key place in contemporary art. This is evident from the sheer amount of moving image media in public galleries and museums, retrospectives, biennales and artist-run initiatives. This chapter focuses on the installation of Australian artists’ moving image production, with an emphasis on installation and the way in which the work meets its audience. It examines the recent work of Brian Fuata, Pia van Gelder, Biljana Jancic and Angelica Mesiti with respect to exhibitions mounted in Sydney from 2012 to 2018. The concept of the dispositif—as a set of interrelated elements of an artwork for spatial display in the gallery—is put to work to confront the heterogeneity of forms, practices and experiences within four specified categories: ‘Document, Signal, Space and Channel’. This research connects the experience of the artists and curators in question, drawing on interviews, and links this with historical and theoretical discourse in relation to moving image (and sound) in the gallery. The chapter aims to show the inventive ways in which contemporary artists rely on inherited twentieth-century traditions of this relatively new (historically speaking) medium and engage with digital media convergence. This research finds Australian artists to be at the cutting edge of the field and provides a foundation to extend this research to the wider Asia Pacific region or international context. This chapter should be of interest to artists, filmmakers, screen and art theorists and creative practice-based researchers working in this domain.

References

  1. Arozqueta, C. (2017). Biljana Jancic at UTS Gallery. Retrieved from https://www.artforum.com/picks/biljana-jancic-67177
  2. Balsom, E. (2013). Exhibiting Cinema in Contemporary Art. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barclay, E. (2011). Are ‘Friends’ Electric. Runway Magazine, 20, 18–21.Google Scholar
  4. Batty, C., & Kerrigan, S. (2018). Screen Production Research: Creative Practice as a Mode of Enquiry. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bellour, R. (2012). La Querelle des dispositifs: Cinéma, Installations, Expositions. Paris: POL.Google Scholar
  6. Bennett, O. (2016, January 7). ‘Images in Motion: The Rise of Video Art.’ Art Fund.Google Scholar
  7. Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. (1999). Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bruno, G. (2007). Public Intimacy: Architecture and the Visual Arts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Burden, C. (1971). Shoot. Los Angeles: F Space.Google Scholar
  10. Carey, P. (2018). Artist Angelica Mesiti Selected to Represent Australia at the 2019 Venice Biennale. ABC Arts. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-03-09/angelicamesiti-is-selected-for-the-venice-biennale/9533660. Retreived 28 Sep 2019.
  11. Comer, S. (2009). Film and Video Art. London: Tate.Google Scholar
  12. Duguet, A. (1988). Dispositifs. Communications, 48(1), 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fairfax, D. (2018). Introduction: The Quarrel of the Dispositifs: Reprise. In Cinema and the Museum, Special Issue: Senses of Cinema. http://sensesofcinema.com/2018/cinema-and-the-museum/the-quarrel-of-the-dispositifs/. Retrieved 28 Sep 2019.
  14. Fuata, B. (2015). Apparitional Charlatan – A Revisionist Account of an Arbitrary Historical Category of Dance Film Is a Performance of Our Time Together on Stage Before Class …. Sydney: Carriageworks.Google Scholar
  15. Giannachi, G., & Westerman, J. (2017). Histories of Performance Documentation: Museum, Artistic, and Scholarly Practices. Milton: Routledge Ltd..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goldsmith, K. (2011). Ubu Web. Retrieved from http://www.ubu.com/resources/
  17. Iles, C., & Whitney Museum of American Art. (2001). Into the Light: The Projected Image in American Art, 1964–1977. New York: Whitney Museum of American Art.Google Scholar
  18. Jancic, B. (2017). Surface Tension. Sydney: UTS Art.Google Scholar
  19. Manasseh, C. (2009). The Problematic of Video Art in the Museum, 1968–1990. Amherst: Cambria Press.Google Scholar
  20. Martin, A. (2014). Mise en Scène and Film Style: From Classical Hollywood to New Media Art. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Mesiti, A. (2015). The Colour of Saying. Sydney: Anna Schwartz Gallery.Google Scholar
  22. Munt, A. (2017). Catalogue Essay: Surface Tension. Sydney: UTS Art.Google Scholar
  23. Newman, M. (2009). Moving Image in the Gallery Since the 1990s. In S. Comer (Ed.), Film and Video Art. London: Tate.Google Scholar
  24. Phelan, P. (1993). In 1st ed. (Ed.), Unmarked: The Politics of Performance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Richards, B. (2018). Angelica Mesiti. Retrieved from https://nga.gov.au/installations/mesiti/default.cfm
  26. Steyerl, H., & Berardi, F. (2012). The Wretched of the Screen. Berlin: Cc2012: Sternberg Press.Google Scholar
  27. Suderburg, E. (Ed.). (2000). Space, Site, Intervention. Minneapolis/Oxford: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  28. van Gelder, P. (2011). AV Bells. Melbourne: Westspace.Google Scholar
  29. van Gelder, P. (2012). Eyes Without a Face. Sydney: Artspace.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.University of Technology SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations