Advertisement

Novel Breeding and Biotechnological Approaches to Mitigate the Effects of Heat Stress on Cotton

  • Muhammad Salman
  • Sajid Majeed
  • Iqrar Ahmad Rana
  • Rana Muhammad Atif
  • Muhammad Tehseen Azhar
Chapter

Abstract

High-temperature stress resulting from global warming is a major limiting factor for agriculture around the globe. Although cotton is a warmer-season crop, consistent high temperatures above optimal levels lead to various changes in morphological, physiological and biochemical characteristics of the plants that reduce the yield and quality of fibre. Breeding for thermotolerant cultivars is one of the best possible strategies to mitigate the adverse effect of heat stress. For this purpose, sufficient knowledge of plant response to heat stress, the mechanism of high-temperature tolerance and possible breeding strategies is imperative. All the stages of plant growth are affected by heat stress but the level of heat threshold varies at different stages. Heat stress may inhibit or reduce seed germination, causing poor seedlings and wilted roots at early stages, whereas at later stages it may adversely affect vegetative growth, reproductive growth, photosynthesis rate and cell membrane stability. Heat stress may also modulate the level of metabolites, hormones and reactive oxygen species (ROS). The expression of different heat shock proteins (HSP) varies with increase in temperature. In addition to HSPs, the cotton plant has various other mechanisms to cope with heat stress such as production of antioxidants for scavenging of ROS, maintenance of membrane stability, accumulation of compatible solutes and activation of various stress-responsive genes. A comprehensive understanding of traditional and advanced breeding and biotechnological approaches is required to improve heat tolerance in plants. There are many examples of plant improvement using traditional breeding approaches, but few achievements by utilizing biotechnological tools are reported, which is the result of very limited knowledge of molecular approaches and the genes related to heat tolerance. Conventional breeding approaches combined with biotechnological tools can provide opportunities to identify and incorporate genes related to stress tolerance for the development of new cultivars that can withstand high temperatures.

Keywords

Biotechnological tools Breeding strategies Heat stress HSPs Upland cotton 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Centre for Advanced Studies in Agriculture and Food Security, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad-38040-Pakistan and Punjab Agricultural Research Board, Government of Punjab-Pakistan for providing a research grant under CAS-PARB Project No. 964.

References

  1. Abd-El-Haleem S, Metwali EM, Al-Felaly AM (2010) Genetic analysis of yield and its components of some Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.) varieties. World J Agric Sci 6:615–621Google Scholar
  2. Abdelmageed A, Gruda N (2009) Influence of high temperatures on gas exchange rate and growth of eight tomato cultivars under controlled heat stress conditions. Eur J Horti Sci 74:152Google Scholar
  3. Abdul-Baki AA, Stommel JR (1995) Pollen viability and fruit set of tomato genotypes under optimumand high-temperature regimes. Horti Sci 30:115–117Google Scholar
  4. Acquaah G (2009) Principles of plant genetics and breeding. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  5. Ahmad RT, Malik TA, Khan IA, Jaskani MJ (2009) Genetic analysis of some morpho-physiological traits related to drought stress in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Int J Agric Biol 11:235–240Google Scholar
  6. Ahmed FE, Hall AE, DeMason DA (1992) Heat injury during floral development in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata, Fabaceae). Am J Bot 79:784–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ahuja I, de Vos RC, Bones AM, Hall RD (2010) Plant molecular stress responses face climate change. Trends Plant Sci 15:664–674PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Alcázar R et al (2006) Involvement of polyamines in plant response to abiotic stress. Biotechnol Lett 28:1867–1876PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Asada K (2006) Production and scavenging of reactive oxygen species in chloroplasts and their functions. Plant Physiol 141:391–396PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ashraf M, Hafeez M (2004) Thermotolerance of pearl millet and maize at early growth stages: growth and nutrient relations. Biol Plant 48:81–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ashraf M, Saeed M, Qureshi M (1994) Tolerance to high temperature in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) at initial growth stages. Environ Exp Bot 34:275–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Axtell MJ (2013) Classification and comparison of small RNAs from plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 64:137–159PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Azhar F, Ali Z, Akhtar M, Khan A, Trethowan R (2009) Genetic variability of heat tolerance, and its effect on yield and fibre quality traits in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Plant Breed 128:356–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Baloch MJ, Lakho AR, Rind R, Bhutto H (2000) Screening of cotton genotypes for heat tolerance via in vitro gametophytic selection technique. Pak J Biol Sci 3:2037–2038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Batool S, Khan NU, Gul S, Baloch MJ, Turi NA, Taran SA, Saeed M (2013) Genetic analysis for yield and yield contributing variables in upland cotton. J Food Agric Environ 11:624–630Google Scholar
  16. Blum A (2018) Plant breeding for stress environments. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  17. Blum A, Ebercon A (1981) Cell membrane stability as a measure of drought and heat tolerance in wheat 1. Crop Sci 21:43–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bradow JM, Davidonis GH (2000) Quantitation of fiber quality and the cotton production-processing interface: A physiologist’s perspective. J Cott Sci 4:34–64Google Scholar
  19. Brown R, Oosterhuis D, Coker D, Fowler L (2003) The dynamics of dry matter partitioning in the cotton boll of modern and obsolete cultivars. In: Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Conferences, National Cotton Council, Memphis, TN pp 1886–1889.Google Scholar
  20. Burke J (2001) Opportunities for improving cotton’s tolerance to high temperature. In: Dugger CP, Richter DA (eds) Proceeding of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences. National Cotton Council of America, Memphis, TNGoogle Scholar
  21. Chang H-C, Tang Y-C, Hayer-Hartl M, Hartl FU (2007) SnapShot: molecular chaperones, Part I. Cell 128:212.e211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chen L, Hellmann H (2013) Plant E3 ligases: flexible enzymes in a sessile world. Mol Plant 6:1388–1404PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Collins GG, Nie X, Saltveit ME (1995) Heat shock proteins and chilling sensitivity of mung bean hypocotyls. J Exp Bot 46:795–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Crafts-Brandner SJ, Salvucci ME (2002) Sensitivity of photosynthesis in a C4 plant, maize, to heat stress. Plant Physiol 129:1773–1780PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cui F et al (2012) Arabidopsis ubiquitin conjugase UBC32 is an ERAD component that functions in brassinosteroid-mediated salt stress tolerance. Plant Cell 24:233PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. De Storme N, D Geelen (2014) The impact of environmental stress on male reproductive development in plants: biological processes and molecular mechanisms. Plant Cell Environ 37:1–18Google Scholar
  27. Djanaguiraman M, Annie Sheeba J, Durga Devi D, Bangarusamy U (2009) Cotton leaf senescence can be delayed by nitrophenolate spray through enhanced antioxidant defence system. J Agron Crop Sci 195:213–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Djanaguiraman M, Prasad PV, Boyle D, Schapaugh W (2013) Soybean pollen anatomy, viability and pod set under high temperature stress. J Agron Crop Sci 199:171–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. dos Reis SP, Lima AM, de Souza CRB (2012) Recent molecular advances on downstream plant responses to abiotic stress. Int J Mol Sci 13:8628–8647PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. El-kholy AS, Hall AE, Mohsen AA (1997) Heat and chilling tolerance during germination and heat tolerance during flowering are not associated in cowpea. Crop Sci 37:456–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. El-Refaey R, El-Razek UA (2013) Generation mean analysis for yield, its components and quality characteristics in four crosses of Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.). Asian J Crop Sci 5:153–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Erickson A, Markhart A (2002) Flower developmental stage and organ sensitivity of bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) to elevated temperature Plant. Plant Cell Environ 25:123–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Essamine J, Ammar S, Bouzid S (2010) Impact of heat stress on germination and growth in higher plants: physiological, biochemical and molecular repercussion and mechanisms of defense. J Biol Sci 10:565–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fariduddin Q, Varshney P, Yusuf M, Ahmad A (2013) Polyamines: potent modulators of plant responses to stress. J Plant Interact 8:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Feaster C, Turcotte E (1985) Use of heat tolerance in cotton breeding. In: Dugger CP, Richter DA (Eds) Proceeding of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences, National Cotton Council, Memphis, TN pp 364–366.Google Scholar
  36. Feaster C, Young E, Turcotte E (1980) Comparison of artificial and natural selection in American pima cotton under different environments 1. Crop Sci 20:555–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fisher W (1973) Association of temperature and boll set. In: Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf, National Cotton Council, Memphis, TN pp 9–10.Google Scholar
  38. Fitter AH, Hay RK (2012) Environmental physiology of plants. Academic press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  39. Galiba G (1997) Heat stress induced differential alternations in the photosynthesis, membrane thermostability and biomass production of bread and durum wheat varieties. Acta Agron Hungar 45:1–15Google Scholar
  40. Gipson J, Joham H (1969) Influence of night temperature on growth and development of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). III. fiber elongation 1. Crop Sci 9:127–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Greer DH, Weedon MM (2012) Modelling photosynthetic responses to temperature of grapevine (Vitis vinifera cv. Semillon) leaves on vines grown in a hot climate. Plant Cell Environ 35:1050–1064PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Grover A, Mittal D, Negi M, Lavania D (2013) Generating high temperature tolerant transgenic plants: achievements and challenges. Plant Sci 205:38–47PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Guan Q, Lu X, Zeng H, Zhang Y, Zhu J (2013) Heat stress induction of mi R 398 triggers a regulatory loop that is critical for thermotolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant J 74:840–851PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Guo Q, Zhang J, Gao Q, Xing S, Li F, Wang W (2008) Drought tolerance through overexpression of monoubiquitin in transgenic tobacco. J Plant Physiol 165:1745–1755PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Hall AE (2000) Crop responses to environment. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FLCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hall A (2004) Mitigation of stress by crop management. In: Advances in agronomy, vol 93. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  47. Halliwell B (2006) Oxidative stress and neurodegeneration: where are we now? J Neurochem 97:1634–1658PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Hanson PM, Chen JT, Kuo G (2002) Gene action and heritability of high-temperature fruit set in tomato line CL5915. Hortic Sci 37:172–175Google Scholar
  49. Harsant J, Pavlovic L, Chiu G, Sultmanis S, Sage TL (2013) High temperature stress and its effect on pollen development and morphological components of harvest index in the C3 model grass Brachypodium distachyon. J Exp Bot 64:2971–2983PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hasanuzzaman M, Nahar K, Fujita M, Ahmad P, Chandna R, Prasad M, Ozturk M (2013) Enhancing plant productivity under salt stress: Relevance of poly-omics. In: Salt stress in plants, Springer, New York, NY pp 113–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hazra P, Ansary S (2008) Genetics of heat tolerance for floral and fruit set to high temperature stress in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). SABRAO J Breed Genet 40:117-125Google Scholar
  52. Hussain M, Azhar FM, Khan AA (2009) Genetics of inheritance and correlations of some morphological and yield contributing traits in upland cotton. Pak J Bot 41:2975–2986Google Scholar
  53. Ibrahim AM, Quick JS (2001) Heritability of heat tolerance in winter and spring wheat. Crop Sci 41:1401–1405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Iqbal M et al (2013) Studies of genetic variation for yield related traits in upland cotton. Am Eur J Agric Environ Sci 13:611–618Google Scholar
  55. Jenks MA, Hasegawa PM, Jain SM (2007) Advances in molecular breeding toward drought and salt tolerant crops. Springer, New York, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Jia F, Rock CD (2013) MIR846 and MIR842 comprise a cistronic MIRNA pair that is regulated by abscisic acid by alternative splicing in roots of Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol 81:447–460PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Jóhannsson MH, Stephenson AG (1998) Effects of temperature during microsporogenesis on pollen performance in Cucurbita pepo L.(Cucurbitaceae). Int J Plant Sci 159:616–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kakani V, Reddy K, Koti S, Wallace T, Prasad P, Reddy V, Zhao D (2005) Differences in in vitro pollen germination and pollen tube growth of cotton cultivars in response to high temperature. Ann Bot 96:59–67PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Karuppanapandian T, Moon J-C, Kim C, Manoharan K, Kim W (2011) Reactive oxygen species in plants: their generation, signal transduction, and scavenging mechanisms. Aust J Crop Sci 5:709-725Google Scholar
  60. Katiyar-Agarwal S, Agarwal M, Grover A (2003) Heat-tolerant basmati rice engineered by over-expression of hsp101. Plant Mol Biol 51:677–686PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Khalid I, Azhar FM, Khan IA, Ehsan U (2010) Assessment of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) germplasm under water stress condition. Int J Agric Biol 12:251–255Google Scholar
  62. Khan N, Hassan G, Kumbhar M, Parveen A, Ahmad W, Shah S, Ahmad S (2007) Gene action of seed traits and oil content in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). SABRAO J Breed Genet 39:17–29Google Scholar
  63. Killi F, Efe L, Mustafayev S (2005) Genetic and environmental variability in yield, yield components and lint quality traits of cotton. Int J Agric Biol 6:1007–1010Google Scholar
  64. Kurepa J, Toh‐e A, Smalle JA (2008) 26S proteasome regulatory particle mutants have increased oxidative stress tolerance. Plant J 53:102–114PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Lather B, Saini M, Punia M (2001) Hybrid cotton retrospect and prospects in Indian context. Nat J Plant Improv 3:61–68Google Scholar
  66. Latif A et al (2014) Genetics of yield and some yield contributing traits in Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). J Plant Breed Crop Sci 6:57–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lee JH, Hübel A, Schöffl F (1995) Derepression of the activity of genetically engineered heat shock factor causes constitutive synthesis of heat shock proteins and increased thermotolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant J 8:603–612PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Lewis H, May L, Bourland F (2000) Cotton yield components and yield stability. In: 2000 Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Conferences, San Antonio, USA, 4–8 January, 2000, National Cotton Council, Memphis, TN Vol 1 pp 532–536Google Scholar
  69. Liu Z, Yuan YL, Liu SQ, Yu XN, Rao LQ (2006) Screening for high‐temperature tolerant cotton cultivars by testing in vitro pollen germination, pollen tube growth and boll retention. J Integr Plant Biol 48:706–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Liu HC, Liao HT, Charng YY (2011) The role of class A1 heat shock factors (HSFA1s) in response to heat and other stresses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ 34:738–751PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. Lobell DB, Schlenker W, Costa-Roberts J (2011) Climate trends and global crop production since 1980. Science 333:616–620PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. Malik MN, Chaudhry FI, Makhdum MI (1999) Cell membrane thermostability as a measure of heat-tolerance in cotton. Pak J Sci Indus Res 42:44–46Google Scholar
  73. Marchand FL, Mertens S, Kockelbergh F, Beyens L, Nijs I (2005) Performance of High Arctic tundra plants improved during but deteriorated after exposure to a simulated extreme temperature event. Glob Chang Biol 11:2078–2089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. McCarty JC, Jenkins JN, Wu J (2004) Primitive accession derived germplasm by cultivar crosses as sources for cotton improvement. Crop Sci 44:1226–1230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. McDaniel R (1982) The physiology of temperature effects on plants. In: Breeding plants for less favorable environments. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  76. Mellman DL, Gonzales ML, Song C, Barlow CA, Wang P, Kendziorski C, Anderson RA (2008) A PtdIns4, 5P2-regulated nuclear poly (A) polymerase controls expression of select mRNAs. Nature 451:1013PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. Meredith WR (1984) Influence of leaf morphology on lint yield of cotton-enhancement by the sub okra trait 1. Crop Sci 24:855–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Miller G, Shulaev V, Mittler R (2008) Reactive oxygen signaling and abiotic stress. Physiol Plant 133:481–489PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  79. Misra S, Wu Y, Venkataraman G, Sopory SK, Tuteja N (2007) Heterotrimeric G-protein complex and G-protein-coupled receptor from a legume (Pisum sativum): role in salinity and heat stress and cross-talk with phospholipase C. Plant J 51:656–669PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. Mohammed AR, Tarpley L (2010) Effects of high night temperature and spikelet position on yield-related parameters of rice (Oryza sativa L.) plants. Eur J Agron 33:117–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Moreno AA, Orellana A (2011) The physiological role of the unfolded protein response in plants. Biol Res 44:75–80PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  82. Murakami T, Matsuba S, Funatsuki H, Kawaguchi K, Saruyama H, Tanida M, Sato Y (2004) Over-expression of a small heat shock protein, sHSP17. 7, confers both heat tolerance and UV-B resistance to rice plants. Mol Breed 13:165–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Murtaza N (2006) Study of gene effects for boll number, boll weight, and seed index in cotton. J Cent Eur Agric 6:255–262Google Scholar
  84. Murtaza N, Qayyum A, Malik W, Noor E (2006) Genetic study of yield of seed cotton and plant height in cotton genotypes. Int J Agric Biol 8:630–635Google Scholar
  85. Mutters R, Ferreira L, Hall A (1989) Proline content of the anthers and pollen of heat-tolerant and heat-sensitive cowpea subjected to different temperatures. Crop Sci 29:1497–1500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Nahar K, Ahamed KU, Fujita M (2010) Phenological variation and its relation with yield in several wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars under normal and late sowing mediated heat stress condition. Not Sci Biol 2:51–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Nathan B, Oosterhuis DM, McMichael B (2005) Genotypic root responce of cotton at sub-optimal temperature environments. The ASA-CSSA-SSSA International Annual Meetings (November 6-10, 2005)Google Scholar
  88. Nover L, Bharti K, Döring P, Mishra SK, Ganguli A, Scharf K-D (2001) Arabidopsis and the heat stress transcription factor world: how many heat stress transcription factors do we need? Cell Stress Chaperones 6:177PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Nyquist WE, Baker R (1991) Estimation of heritability and prediction of selection response in plant populations. Crit Rev Plant Sci 10:235–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Omae H, Kumar A, Shono M (2012) Adaptation to high temperature and water deficit in the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) during the reproductive period. J Bot 2012:803413Google Scholar
  91. Oosterhuis DM (1999) Yield response to environmental extremes in cotton. Spec Rep Univ Arkan Agric Exp Stat 193:30–38Google Scholar
  92. Oosterhuis D (2002) Day or night high temperatures: a major cause of yield variability. Cott Grow 46:8–9Google Scholar
  93. Oshino T, Abiko M, Saito R, Ichiishi E, Endo M, Kawagishi-Kobayashi M, Higashitani A (2007) Premature progression of anther early developmental programs accompanied by comprehensive alterations in transcription during high-temperature injury in barley plants. Mol Genet Genomics 278:31–42PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  94. Pagamas P, Nawata E (2008) Sensitive stages of fruit and seed development of chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L. var. Shishito) exposed to high-temperature stress. Sci Hortic 117:21–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Paulsen GM (1994) High temperature responses of crop plants J Physiology determination of crop yield. In: Boote KJ, Bennett JM, Sinclair TR, Paulsen GM (eds) Physiology and determination of crop yield. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 365–389Google Scholar
  96. Pettigrew W (2004) Physiological consequences of moisture deficit stress in cotton. Crop Sci 44:1265–1272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Pettigrew W, Heitholt J, Vaughn K (1993) Gas exchange differences and comparative anatomy among cotton leaf-type isolines. Crop Sci 33:1295–1299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Porch T, Jahn M (2001) Effects of high‐temperature stress on microsporogenesis in heat‐sensitive and heat‐tolerant genotypes of Phaseolus vulgaris. Plant Cell Environ 24:723–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Prasad PVV, Craufurd PQ, Kakani VG, Wheeler TR, Boote K (2001) Influence of high temperature during pre-and post-anthesis stages of floral development on fruit-set and pollen germination in peanut. J Funct Plant Biol 28:233–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Prasad P, Boote K, Allen L Jr, Sheehy J, Thomas J (2006) Species, ecotype and cultivar differences in spikelet fertility and harvest index of rice in response to high temperature stress. Field Crop Res 95:398–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Prasinos C, Krampis K, Samakovli D, Hatzopoulos P (2004) Tight regulation of expression of two Arabidopsis cytosolic Hsp90 genes during embryo development. J Exp Bot 56:633–644PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  102. Pressman E, Peet MM, Pharr DM (2002) The effect of heat stress on tomato pollen characteristics is associated with changes in carbohydrate concentration in the developing anthers. Ann Bot 90:631–636PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Qin F et al (2008) Arabidopsis DREB2A-interacting proteins function as RING E3 ligases and negatively regulate plant drought stress–responsive gene expression. Plant Cell 20:1693–1707PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Raison J, Berry J, Armond P, Pike C (1980) Membrane properties in relation to the adaptation of plants to temperature stress. John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  105. Rana V, Ram S, Nehra K (2017) Review proline biosynthesis and its role in abiotic stress. Int J Agric Innov Res 6:473–478Google Scholar
  106. Reddy V, Baker D, Hodges H (1991) Temperature effects on cotton canopy growth, photosynthesis, and respiration. Agron J 83:699–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Reddy KR, Hodges HF, McKinion JM (1997) Crop modeling and applications: a cotton example. Adv Agron 59:226–290Google Scholar
  108. Reddy KR, Davidonis GH, Johnson AS, Vinyard BT (1999) Temperature regime and carbon dioxide enrichment alter cotton boll development and fiber properties. Agron J 91:851–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Reynolds M, Balota M, Delgado M, Amani I, Fischer R (1994) Physiological and morphological traits associated with spring wheat yield under hot, irrigated conditions. Funct Plant Biol 21:717–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Reynolds M, Ortiz-Monasterio I, McNab A (Eds) (2001) Application of physiology in wheat breeding. CIMMYT, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  111. Rizhsky L, Liang H, Mittler R (2002) The combined effect of drought stress and heat shock on gene expression in tobacco. Plant Physiol 130:1143–1151PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Rizhsky L, Liang H, Shuman J, Shulaev V, Davletova S, Mittler R (2004) When defense pathways collide. The response of Arabidopsis to a combination of drought and heat stress. Plant Physiol 134:1683–1696PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Rodríguez M, Canales E, Borrás-Hidalgo O (2005) Molecular aspects of abiotic stress in plants. Biotecnol Apl 22:1–10Google Scholar
  114. Saini H, Sedgley M, Aspinall D (1984) Development anatomy in wheat of male sterility induced by heat stress, water deficit or abscisic acid. Funct Plant Biol 11:243–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Sakata T et al (2010) Auxins reverse plant male sterility caused by high temperatures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:8569–8574PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  116. Sanmiya K, Suzuki K, Egawa Y, Shono M (2004) Mitochondrial small heat‐shock protein enhances thermotolerance in tobacco plants. FEBS Lett 557:265–268PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  117. Saranga YE, Jiang CX, Wright R, Yakir D, Paterson A (2004) Genetic dissection of cotton physiological responses to arid conditions and their inter‐relationships with productivity. Plant Cell Environ 27:263–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Sato S, Kamiyama M, Iwata T, Makita N, Furukawa H, Ikeda H (2006) Moderate increase of mean daily temperature adversely affects fruit set of Lycopersicon esculentum by disrupting specific physiological processes in male reproductive development. Ann Bot 97:731–738PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Singh RP, Prasad PV, Sunita K, Giri S, Reddy KR (2007) Influence of high temperature and breeding for heat tolerance in cotton: A review. Adv Agron 93:313–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Soliman WS, Fujimori M, Tase K, Sugiyama S (2011) Oxidative stress and physiological damage under prolonged heat stress in C3 grass Lolium perenne. Grassl Sci 57:101–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Srivastava S, Pathak AD, Gupta PS, Shrivastava AK, Srivastava AK (2012) Hydrogen peroxide-scavenging enzymes impart tolerance to high temperature induced oxidative stress in sugarcane. J Environ Biol 33:657PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  122. Staiger CJ, Blanchoin L (2006) Actin dynamics: old friends with new stories. Curr Opin Plant Biol 9:554–562PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  123. Sullivan CY (1972) Mechanisms of heat and drought resistance in grain sorghum and methods of measurement. Sorghum in seventies. Oxford & IBH Pub Co. LondonGoogle Scholar
  124. Sumesh K, Sharma-Natu P, Ghildiyal M (2008) Starch synthase activity and heat shock protein in relation to thermal tolerance of developing wheat grains. Biol Plant 52:749–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Suzuki K, Takeda H, Tsukaguchi T, Egawa Y (2001) Ultrastructural study on degeneration of tapetum in anther of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under heat stress. Sex Plant Reprod 13:293–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Teale WD, Paponov IA, Palme K (2006) Auxin in action: signalling, transport and the control of plant growth and development. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7:847–859PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  127. Todaka D, Nakashima K, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2012) Toward understanding transcriptional regulatory networks in abiotic stress responses and tolerance in rice. Rice 5:6PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Toh S et al (2008) High temperature-induced abscisic acid biosynthesis and its role in the inhibition of gibberellin action in Arabidopsis seeds. Plant Physiol 146:1368–1385PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Török Z et al (2001) Synechocystis HSP17 is an amphitropic protein that stabilizes heat-stressed membranes and binds denatured proteins for subsequent chaperone-mediated refolding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:3098–3103PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  130. ur Rahman H, Malik SA, Saleem M (2004) Heat tolerance of upland cotton during the fruiting stage evaluated using cellular membrane thermostability. Field Crop Res 85:149–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Van Ploeg D, Heuvelink E (2005) Influence of sub-optimal temperature on tomato growth and yield: a review. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 80:652–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Vasil IK (1987) Developing cell and tissue culture systems for the improvement of cereal and grass crops. J Plant Physiol 128:193–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Vinocur B, Altman A (2005) Recent advances in engineering plant tolerance to abiotic stress: achievements and limitations. Curr Opin Biotechnol 16:123–132PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  134. Vollenweider P, Günthardt-Goerg MS (2005) Diagnosis of abiotic and biotic stress factors using the visible symptoms in foliage. Environ Pollut 137:455–465PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  135. Wahid A, Gelani S, Ashraf M, Foolad MR (2007) Heat tolerance in plants: an overview. Environ Exp Bot 61:199–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Wang W, Vinocur B, Shoseyov O, Altman A (2004) Role of plant heat-shock proteins and molecular chaperones in the abiotic stress response. Trends Plant Sci 9:244–252PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  137. Wang J, Cui L, Wang Y, Li J (2009) Growth, lipid peroxidation and photosynthesis in two tall fescue cultivars differing in heat tolerance. Biol Plant 53:237–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Wang Y, Sun F, Cao H, Peng H, Ni Z, Sun Q, Yao Y (2012) TamiR159 directed wheat TaGAMYB cleavage and its involvement in anther development and heat response. PLoS One 7:e48445PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Wells R, Meredith WR, Williford JR (1986) Canopy photosynthesis and its relationship to plant productivity in near-isogenic cotton lines differing in leaf morphology. Plant Physiol 82:635–640PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Wendel JF, Grover CE (2015) Taxonomy and evolution of the cotton genus, Gossypium. In: Fang DD, Percy RG (eds) Cotton, 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 25–44Google Scholar
  141. Willits D, Peet M (1998) The effect of night temperature on greenhouse grown tomato yields in warm climates. J Agric For Meteorol 92:191–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Yan K et al (2012) Stress-induced alternative splicing provides a mechanism for the regulation of microRNA processing in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Cell 48:521–531PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  143. Yang X et al (2006) Tolerance of photosynthesis to photoinhibition, high temperature and drought stress in flag leaves of wheat: a comparison between a hybridization line and its parents grown under field conditions. Plant Sci 171:389–397PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  144. Yeh C-H, Kaplinsky NJ, Hu C, Charng Y-Y (2012) Some like it hot, some like it warm: phenotyping to explore thermotolerance diversity. Plant Sci 195:10–23PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Yoshida S, Satake T, Mackill D (1981) High-temperature stress in rice [study conducted at IRRI, Philippines]. IRRI Res Paper SerGoogle Scholar
  146. Yun-Ying C, Hua D, Li-Nian Y, Zhi-Qing W, Shao-Chuan Z, Jian-Chang Y (2008) Effect of heat stress during meiosis on grain yield of rice cultivars differing in heat tolerance and its physiological mechanism. Acta Agron Sin 34:2134–2142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Zhu J-K (2002) Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 53:247–273PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Zonia L, Munnik T (2006) Cracking the green paradigm: functional coding of phosphoinositide signals in plant stress responses. In: Biology of inositols and phosphoinositides. Springer, New York, NY, pp 207–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muhammad Salman
    • 1
  • Sajid Majeed
    • 1
  • Iqrar Ahmad Rana
    • 2
  • Rana Muhammad Atif
    • 1
  • Muhammad Tehseen Azhar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant Breeding and GeneticsUniversity of AgricultureFaisalabadPakistan
  2. 2.Centre of Agricultural Biochemistry and BiotechnologyUniversity of AgricultureFaisalabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations