Advertisement

The Role and Effectiveness of the G20

  • Jaroslaw KantorowiczEmail author
Chapter
Part of the United Nations University Series on Regionalism book series (UNSR, volume 17)

Abstract

This chapter describes the evolution of the G20, which was heavily marked by crisis events. It zooms into how the G20 has recently evolved from an abrupt global response to the global financial crisis to a forum for international cooperation in multiple policy areas, in other words from a “crisis committee” to a “steering committee”. This has implications for the G20’s objectives. Although initially preoccupied with financial regulation reforms and balanced economic growth, the G20 has experienced a noticeable expansion of its objectives to issues such as corruption, climate change, aid and development. Against this background, this chapter describes the institutional design and effectiveness of the G20 with the goal being to position the G20 as an essential part of the changing global order. This chapter provides a detailed account of the institutions’ main strengths and weaknesses, as well as threats and opportunities as one of the world’s most important diplomatic mechanisms for international economic governance.

Keywords

G-20 Global order Institutional design Permanent members International organizations Legitimacy Informality Intermediaries Summit Compliance 

Further Readings

  1. Amtenbrink, F., Blokker N., van den Bogaert, S., Cuyvers A., Heine K., Hillion C., Kantorowicz J., Lenk H., & Repasi R. (2015). The European Union’s role in international economic fora paper 1: The G20. Study for the ECON Committee. IP/A/ECON/2014-15.Google Scholar
  2. Hajnal, P. I. (2014). The G20. Evolution, interrelationships, documentation. New York: Routledge. G20 Information center provided by the G20 Research Group available at http://www.g20.utoronto.ca/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Luckhurst, J. (2016). G20 since the global crisis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Amtenbrink, F., Blokker N., van den Bogaert S., Cuyvers A., Heine K., Christophe, H., Kantorowicz J., Lenk H., & Repasi R. (2015). The European Union’s role in international economic fora paper 1: The G20. Study for the ECON Committee. IP/A/ECON/2014-15.Google Scholar
  2. Angeloni, I., & Pisani-Ferry, J. (2012). The G20: Characters in search of an author (Bruegel Working Paper 2012/04).Google Scholar
  3. Åslund, A. (2009). The Group of 20 must be stopped. Financial Times, 26 November 2009, available at https://www.ft.com/content/37deaeb4-dad0-11de-933d-00144feabdc0. Accessed on 9 Apr 2017.
  4. Beeson, M., & Bell, S. (2009). The G20 and International Economic Governance: Hegemony, Collectivism, or Both? Global Governance, 15, 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertoldi, M., Scherrer, H., & Stanoeva, G. (2013). The G20@5: Is it still delivering? ECFIN Economic Brief 2013.Google Scholar
  6. Callaghan, M. (2013a). Relaunching the G20. Sydney: Analysis, Lowy Institute for International Policy.Google Scholar
  7. Callaghan, M. (2013b). Strengthening the core of the G20: Clearer, objectives, better communication, greater transparency and accountability. Sydney: Analysis, Lowy Institute for International Policy.Google Scholar
  8. Cameron, D. (2011). Governance for growth: Building consensus for the future. A report by David Cameron, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  9. Çanacki, I. (2013). G-20 & Turkey’s Presidency in 2015. Turkey in the Troika of G-20, Preparing to Assume the Chair. In 2015 AVİM – Center for Eurasian Studies, 14 November 2013, Ankara, available https://www.hazine.gov.tr/File/?path=ROOT%2F1%2FDocuments%2FDi%C4%9Fer+Bas%C4%B1n+Duyurusu%2FSN_IHC_20131114_G20_AVIM_sunum.pptx. Accessed on 9 Apr 2017.
  10. Cooper, A. (2010). The G20 as an improvised crisis committee and/or a contested ‘steering committee’ for the world. International Affairs, 86(3), 741–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Debaere, P., & Orbie, J. (2013). The European Union in the Gx system. In K. E. Jørgensen & K. V. Laatikainen (Eds.), Routledge handbook on the European Union and international institutions: Performance, policy, power. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Der Spiegel. (2010). Norway takes aim at G-20: ‘One of the Greatest Setbacks Since World War II’. Interview conducted by Manfred Ertel, 22 June 2010, available at http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/norway-takes-aim-at-g-20-one-of-thegreatest-setbacks-since-world-war-ii-a-702104.html. Accessed on 9 Apr 2017.
  13. Eccleston, R., Kellow, A., & Carroll, P. (2015). G20 endorsement in post crisis global governance: More than a toothless talking shop? The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 17, 298–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. G20. (2008). The group of twenty: A history. Available at www.g20.utoronto.ca/docs/g20history.pdf. Accessed on 9 Apr 2017.
  15. G20. (2009a). G20 action plan for recovery and reform. Statement Issued by the G20 Leaders, 2 Apr 2009. Available at http://www.g20.utoronto.ca/2009/2009communique0402.html. Accessed on 9 Apr 2017.
  16. G20. (2009b). The leaders statement: The Pittsburgh Summit, including the Annex: Core values for sustainable economic activity and the framework for strong, sustainable and balanced growth, 25 September 2009. Available at http://www.g20.utoronto.ca/2009/2009communique0925.html. Accessed on 9 Apr 2017.
  17. G20. (2011a). Final declaration: Building our common future: Renewed collective action for the benefit of all, 4 November 2011. Available at http://www.g20.utoronto.ca/2011/2011-cannes-declaration-111104-en.html. Accessed on 9 Apr 2017.
  18. G20. (2011b). Final Communiqué, 4 November 2011. Available at http://www.g20.utoronto.ca/2011/2011-cannes-communique-111104-en.html. Accessed on 9 Apr 2017.
  19. G20. (2015a). Process of working. Available at http://www.g20india.gov.in/aboutg20-processworking.asp?lk=aboutg207. Accessed on 9 Apr 2017.
  20. G20. (2015b). Leadership and structure. Available at http://www.g20india.gov.in/aboutg20-leadership.asp?lk=aboutg206. Accessed on 9 Apr 2017.
  21. G20. (2015c). Sherpas track. Available at http://www.g20india.gov.in/sheraps-track.asp. Accessed on 9 Apr 2017.
  22. Giovannini, A., Gros, D., Ivan, P., Kaczyński, P. M., & Valiante, D. (2012). External representation of the Euro area. European Parliament, Directorate General for Internal Policies. Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy, 2012.  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2149431.
  23. Gradinis, S. (2013). The financial stability board: The new politics of International Financial Regulation. Texas International Law Journal, 48, 157–176.Google Scholar
  24. Henley, P. H., & Blokker, N. M. (2013). The Group of 20: A Short Legal Anatomy from the Perspective of International Institutional Law. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 14(2), 550–607.Google Scholar
  25. International Law Association. (2004). Accountability of international organisations. Final Report. Berlin 2004.Google Scholar
  26. Jin-seo, C. (2010). Five non-G20 nations invited to Seoul Summit. The Korea Times, 9 September 2010. Available at http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/biz/2010/09/301_73469.html. Accessed on 9 Apr 2017.
  27. Jokela, J. (2011). Europe’s declining role in the G20: What role for the EU in the club of the most important powers? (FIIA Briefing Paper 96).Google Scholar
  28. Kern, Steffen (2011). The real G2: Americans, Europeans, and their role in the G20. Transatlantic Academy Paper Series, 2011.Google Scholar
  29. Kirton, J. (2000). The G20: Representativeness, effectiveness, and leadership in global governance. In J. Kirton, J. Daniels, & A. Freytag (Eds.), Guiding global order. G8 governance in the twenty-first century (pp. 143–172). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  30. Kirton, J. (2008). Prospects for the G20 leaders summit on financial markets and the world economy. In: J. Kirton (Ed.), The G20 leaders summit on financial markets and the world economy. Available at: http://www.g8.utoronto.ca/g20/g20leadersbook/kirton.html. Accessed on 9 Apr 2017.
  31. Kirton, John, Kokotsis, Ella, Guebert, Jenilee, Bracht, Caroline, G8 Research Group, G20 Research Group, BRICS Research Group, Munk School of Global Affairs at Trinity College University of Toronto. (2014). Reference Manual for Summit Commitment and Compliance Coding. Available at:. http://www.g8.utoronto.ca/evaluations/compliancemanual-140722.pdf. Accessed on 9 June 2019.
  32. Lyngen, N., & Simmons, C. (2013). The financial stability board: The new face of international financial regulation. Harvard International Law Journal. Special Report, 54, i–x.Google Scholar
  33. Moret, E. (2016). Effective minilateralism for the EU. What, when and how. EUISS Brief. 17/2006. June.Google Scholar
  34. Nasra, S., & Debaere, P. (2016). The European Union in the G20: What role for small states? Cambridge Review of International Affairs 2012, 29, 209–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nolle, D. (2015). Who’s in charge of fixing the world’s financial system? The un[?]der-appreciated lead role of the G20 and the FSB. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, 24(1), 1–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Se-Jeong, K. (2010). Meeting shows hassle in G-20 agenda setting. The Korea Times. Available at: http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/special/2010/08/176_66750.html. Accessed on 13 June 2019.
  37. Urban, M. (2017). The quest for economic resilience in uncertain times (showCASE, No 21).Google Scholar
  38. Van Ham, P. (2012). Upgrading the global financial system. The why and how (Clingendael Policy Brief No. 12).Google Scholar
  39. Vestergaard, J. (2011). The G20 and Beyond: Towards Effective Global Economic Governance (DISS Report 2011:04).Google Scholar
  40. Vestergaard, J., & Wade, R. (2012). Establishing a new global economic council: Governance reform at the G20, the IMF and the World Bank. Global Policy, 3(3), 257–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Viola, L. A. (2015). Orchestration by design: The G20 in international financial regulation. In P. Genschel, D. Snidal, & B. Zangl (Eds.), International Organizations as orchestrators (pp. 88–113). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Wouters, J., & Geraets, D. (2012). The G20 and informal international lawmaking (Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies, Working Paper No. 86).Google Scholar
  43. Wouters, J., & Ramopoulos, T. (2012). The G20 and Global Economic Governance: Lessons from Multilevel European Governance? Journal of International Economic Law, 15(3), 751–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Leiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations