Advertisement

New Localism pp 97-112 | Cite as

Going with the Flow of Human Aspirations

  • Andrew StablesEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Numanities - Arts and Humanities in Progress book series (NAHP, volume 10)

Abstract

The final chapter considers ways in which policy and practice can best “go(…) with the flow of human aspirations”. It does this first by considering the treatment of children, as they constitute one of the various ‘minority’ groups that classical liberal perspectives have tended to regard as less than fully rational, so not to be trusted to follow their own preferences (‘Minority’ groups here include women, in some cases, though they do not form a numerical minority.). Drawing on a range of utilitarian writers, including Bentham, an approach to balancing the Will and Interest rights of children and young people is suggested. The implications of this position are then explored further: first for the treatment of adults generally, and secondly in terms of the possible limitations of a position solely based on conceptions of universal human rights. It is argued that a position grounded in the Capabilities approach developed by Amartya Sen can offer an appropriate response to such limitations.

References

  1. Archard, David. 2002. Children’s rights. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Accessed 21 Nov 2018 from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rights-children.
  2. Barrow, Robin. 1975. Utilitarianism and education. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  3. Barrow, Robin. 2015. Utilitarianism: A contemporary statement. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berlin, Isiah. 1958. Two concepts of liberty. In Isaiah Berlin. 1969. Four essays on liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brontë, Charlotte. 1992. Jane eyre. Ware: Wordsworth.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, Brenda. 1977. Review of barrow: Utilitarianism and education. Mind 86 (341): 130–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dickens, Charles. 2003. Hard times. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  8. Feinberg, Joel. 1980. The child’s right to an open future. In Whose child?, ed. W. Aiken and H. LaFollette, 124–153. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  9. Hare, R. M. 1981. Moral thinking: Its levels, method and point (Oxford: Clarendon Press), and (1992) Utilitarianism and moral education. Studies in Philosophy and Education 11/3: 197–205.Google Scholar
  10. Harré, Rom. 1983. Personal being: A theory for individual psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Hobbes, Thomas. 2014. Leviathan. Accessed 11 Dec 2015 from https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/h/hobbes/thomas/h68l/.
  12. Illich, Ivan. 1995. Deschooling society. New York: Marion Boyers.Google Scholar
  13. Itzkin, Elissa. 1978. Bentham’s Chrestomathia: Utilitarian legacy to english education. Journal of History of Ideas 39 (2): 303–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kambouri, Maria. 2016. Investigating early years teachers’ understanding and response to children’s preconceptions. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 24 (6): 907–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Locke, John. 1692. Some thoughts concerning education. Accessed 11 Dec 2015 from http://legacy.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1692locke-education.asp.
  16. Lyotard, Jean-François. 1986. The postmodern condition. Manchester: Manchester University Press, p. xvi.Google Scholar
  17. Marton, Ferenc, and Roger Säljö. 1976. On qualitative differences in learning—1: Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology 46: 4–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Miles, T. 2006. Utilitarianism and education: A reply to James Tarrant. Journal of Philosophy of Education 26 (2): 261–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nussbaum, Martha. 2000. Women and human development. In The capabilities approach. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
  20. Papastephanou, Marianna (ed.). 2014. Philosophical perspectives on compulsory education. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1878. How to make our ideas clear. Accessed 13 Oct 2011 from http://www.peirce.org/writings/p119.html. Originally published in Popular Science Monthly 12, pp. 286–302.
  22. Rawls, John. 2005, first published 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 2001. Émile: Or on education, ed. Allan Bloom. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  24. Sen, Amartya. 2005. Human rights and capabilities. Journal of Human Development 6 (2): 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Singer, Peter. 2011. Practical ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Smart, Jack, and Bernard Williams. 1983. Utilitarianism: For and against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Stables, Andrew. 1998. Proximity and distance: Moral education and mass communication. Journal of Philosophy of Education 32 (3): 399–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stables, Andrew. 2009. Should the debate about compulsory education be re-opened? (with response from Paul Smeyers), 2009 philosophy of education, Urbana, IL: Philosophy of Education Society, U.S., 153–165.Google Scholar
  29. Stables, Andrew. 2011. Childhood and the philosophy of education: An anti-Aristotelian perspective. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  30. Stables, Andrew. 2012. Be(com)ing human: Semiosis and the myth of reason. Rotterdam: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stables, Andrew. 2013. Conceptions of childhood and the educational rights of the child. Philosophy Study 3 (9): 857–866.Google Scholar
  32. Stables, Andrew. 2016a. Maximal preference utilitarianism as an educational aspiration. Ethics and Education 11 (3): 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stables, Andrew. 2016b. The end(s) of learning and the role of instruction: Shaping the debate. In Handbooks of communication science, vol. 16: Communication and learning, ed. Witt, P. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  34. Stables, Andrew. 2016c. Education as process semiotics: Towards a new model of semiosis for teaching and learning. Semiotica 212: 45–58.Google Scholar
  35. Stables, Andrew, Sonia Jones, and Carol Morgan. 1999. Educating for significant events: The application of Harré’s social reality matrix across the lower secondary school curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies 31 (4): 449–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stables, Andrew. 2018. In search of the environmentalist way: Beyond mending the machine. Educational Theory 67 (4): 417–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tarrant, James. 2006. Utilitarianism, education and the philosophy of moral insignificance. Journal of Philosophy of Education 25 (1): 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. West, Henry. undated. Utilitarianism. Encyclopedia Britannica. Accessed 11 Nov 2015 from www.utilitarianism.com/utilitarianism.html.
  39. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1967. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  40. Wordsworth, William. 1802. My heart leaps up when i behold a rainbow in the sky. Accessed 11 Dec 2015 from http://www.bartleby.com/145/ww194.html.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.(emeritus), University of RoehamptonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations