Ontological Conceptions of Meta-science of Tawhid

  • Masudul Alam Choudhury





  1. Barrow, J. D. (1991). Theories of Everything, the Quest for Ultimate Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar


  1. Choudhury, M. A. (2016). Chapter 5: Tawhid, Al-Wasatiyyah, and Maqasid As-Shari’ah. In Absolute Reality in the Qur’an. New York: New Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Choudhury, M. A. (2017a). A Phenomenological Theory of Islamic Economics. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya Press.Google Scholar


  1. Dawkins, R. (2008). The God Deception. Willmington: Mariner Books.Google Scholar


  1. Fakhry, M. (2004). The Arab-Spanish Interlude and the Revival of Peripateticism. In A History of Islamic Philosophy (pp. 267–302). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar


  1. Hawking, S. W. (1988). A Brief History of Time. New York: Bantam Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Hull, D. L. (1988). Science as a Process, an Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar


  1. Kaku, M. (2015). Chapter 2: Consciousness – A Physicist’s Viewpoint. In The Future of the Mind. New York: Anchor Book.Google Scholar
  2. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar


  1. Lawson, T. (2013). What Is This ‘School’ Called Neoclassical Economics? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37(5), 947–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Levine, D. (1988). Needs, Rights, and the Market. Boulder: Lynne Reinner.Google Scholar


  1. Mahomedy, A. C. (2016). Why the Rationalist Foundations of Modern Science Are Unsuitable for Islamic Economics. A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Economics, School of Accounting, Economics, and Finance, College of Law and Management Studies, University of Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa.Google Scholar


  1. Nicolau, E. (1995). Cybernetics: The Bridge Between Divided Knowledge and Interdisciplinarity. Kybernetes: International Journal of Systems and Cybernetics, 24(7), 21–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Nicolis, G., & Prigogine, I. (1989). Exploring Complexity. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  3. Noor, H. M. (1998). Razi’s Human Needs Theory and Its Relevance to Ethics and Economics. Humanomics, 14(1), 59–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar


  1. Popper, K. R. (1972). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar


  1. Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar


  1. Sen, A. (2010). Commodities and Capabilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Streeten, P. (1981). From Growth to Basic Needs (Development Perspectives). New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar


  1. Veblen, T. (2005). Conspicuous Consumption. London: Penguin Paperback.Google Scholar


  1. Waliullah, S. (n.d.). Hujjat Allah Al-Baligah. Beirut: Dar Al-Marifat.Google Scholar
  2. Weierstrass, K. (1885). Transcendental Number Theory; “Zu Hrn. Lindemann’s Abhandlung: ‘Über die Ludolph’sche Zahl’”. Sitzungber. Königl. Preuss. Akad. Wissensch. zu Berlin, 2, 1067–1086. Wikipedia:
  3. Weyl, H. (1952). Space, Time, Matter. New York: Dover Publications. Writes against the philosophy of unity of knowledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masudul Alam Choudhury
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.International Chair Postgraduate Program in Islamic Economics & Finance Faculty of EconomicsTrisakti UniversityJakartaIndonesia
  2. 2.Annual Summer Visiting Professor Social Economy CenterOISE University of TorontoOntarioCanada
  3. 3.Department of Shari’ah and EconomicsAcademy of Islamic Studies University of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia

Personalised recommendations