A Nationalist Agenda in an EU Context: Implications for Contemporary Culture in Central Europe

  • Virginia Proud
Part of the The European Union in International Affairs book series (EUIA)


The rise of nationalism and populism in European politics presents a grave challenge to the liberal democratic values upon which the EU is founded. In Central Europe, the nationalist governments of Hungary and Poland stoke anti-Brussels sentiment and fear of the ‘Other’, their cultural policies task institutions with building an idealised national narrative and identity, and independent (potentially opposing) voices are marginalised. Hungary’s cultural policies since 2010 provide a case study of a nationalist agenda for culture and highlight the challenge for the independent culture sector. Practitioners may look to the EU, NGOs and creative networks as sources of support, advocacy and resilience, but despite advocating for artistic freedom in external relations, the EU has limited practical scope to ensure artistic freedom within its member states. Further, studies show significant barriers for independent organisations seeking to access EU cultural programmes. Revisiting these programmes and priorities is required to ensure critical freedoms and values are not further eroded.


  1. Adamiecka-Sitek, A., & Keil, M. (2017). Theatre and Democracy. Institutional Practices in Polish Theatre. Polish Theatre Journal 1–2/2017 (online). Available at
  2. Balcer, A. (2016). A Beneath the Surface of Illiberalism: The Recurring Temptation of ‘National Democracy’ in Hungary and Poland—With Lessons for Europe. Warsaw: WiseEuropa.Google Scholar
  3. Balough, E. (2011). The Hungarian Right and Artistic Taste [Blog]. Hungarian Spectrum. Available at
  4. Basthy, A. (2017). Hungarian Academy of Arts Becomes the State’s Ideological Arm. Katoikos (online). Available at
  5. Bernhard, M., & Kubik, J. (Eds.). (2014). Twenty Years After Communism: The Politics of Memory and Commemoration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chaigneau, A. (2003). In Theorem: Theaters of East and West. Regard Sur L’Est, Dossier #35: East-West Cultural Networks (online). Available at
  7. Creative Europe. (2018). Creative Europe Networks. Brussels: EU. Available at
  8. Culture Action Europe. (2017). Creative Europe: Programme Analysis and Recommendations. Brussels: Culture Action Europe. Available at
  9. European Commission. (2016). Joint Communication of the European Parliament and the European Council: Towards an EU Strategy for International Cultural Relations. JOIN(1026) 29 final. Available at
  10. European Commission. (2018). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A New European Agenda for Culture. COM(2018) 267 final. Available at
  11. European Union. (2016, June). European Union, Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe: A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy.Google Scholar
  12. Haines, J. R. (2014). Hungary’s “New Truth”. Foreign Policy Research Institute (online). Accessed Available at
  13. Hamvay, P. (2015). Megy a kukába - Az MMA költségvetése. Magyar Narancs. Available (in Hungarian) at
  14. Hensel, A. (2017). Independent Theatre in the Post-Socialist Countries of Eastern Europe. In B. Brauneck & ITI Germany (Eds.), Independent Theatre in Contemporary Europe (pp. 165–274). Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  15. Higgott, R., & Proud, V. (2017). Populist-Nationalism and Foreign Policy; Cultural Diplomacy, International Interaction and Resilience. Stuttgart: ifa (Institut für Auslandsbeziehungen). Available at
  16. Jászay, T. (2013, June). Finita la Commedia: The Debilitation of Hungarian Independent Theatre. Critical Stages (8). Available at
  17. Jászay, T. (2015). Independent Theatre in Hungary: Independence at a Cost. HowlRound (online). Available at
  18. Jiřík, J. (2016). Ochránci Dobrých Mravů? A2 3/2016. Czech Republic (online). Available at or in English translation at
  19. Logemann, D. (2017). On ‘Polish History’: Disputes Over the Museum of the Second World War in Gdańsk. Cultures of History Forum (online). Available at
  20. Neuen Volkspartei der Freiheitlichen Partei Österreichs. (2017). Zusammen. Für unser Österreich [Together, For Our Austria]. Regierungsprogramm 2017–2022.Google Scholar
  21. Official Journal of the European Union. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2012/C 326/02).Google Scholar
  22. Plipat, S. (2018). State of Artistic Freedom 2018. Denmark: Freemuse. Available at
  23. Prawo i Sprawiedliwość. (2014). Program. Warsaw.Google Scholar
  24. Robinson, M. (2010). Making Adaptive Resilience Real. London: Arts Council England. Available at
  25. Switala, R. (2017). Contemporary Theatre in Poland Under Fire: The Curse. Political Critique (online). Available at
  26. The Weaponisation of Culture. (2018). World Economic Forum Annual General Meeting. Switzerland.Google Scholar
  27. Tompa, A. (2017). And the Winner Is… Appointing Artistic Directors in Hungary. Polish Theatre Journal, 1–2/2017 (online). Available at
  28. Zakaria, F. (1997). The Rise of Illiberal Democracy. Foreign Affairs, 76(6), 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Virginia Proud
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for European Studies (IES)Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)BrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations