Advertisement

A Nationalist Agenda in an EU Context: Implications for Contemporary Culture in Central Europe

  • Virginia Proud
Chapter
Part of the The European Union in International Affairs book series (EUIA)

Abstract

The rise of nationalism and populism in European politics presents a grave challenge to the liberal democratic values upon which the EU is founded. In Central Europe, the nationalist governments of Hungary and Poland stoke anti-Brussels sentiment and fear of the ‘Other’, their cultural policies task institutions with building an idealised national narrative and identity, and independent (potentially opposing) voices are marginalised. Hungary’s cultural policies since 2010 provide a case study of a nationalist agenda for culture and highlight the challenge for the independent culture sector. Practitioners may look to the EU, NGOs and creative networks as sources of support, advocacy and resilience, but despite advocating for artistic freedom in external relations, the EU has limited practical scope to ensure artistic freedom within its member states. Further, studies show significant barriers for independent organisations seeking to access EU cultural programmes. Revisiting these programmes and priorities is required to ensure critical freedoms and values are not further eroded.

References

  1. Adamiecka-Sitek, A., & Keil, M. (2017). Theatre and Democracy. Institutional Practices in Polish Theatre. Polish Theatre Journal 1–2/2017 (online). Available at www.polishtheatrejournal.com/index.php/ptj/article/view/131/505.
  2. Balcer, A. (2016). A Beneath the Surface of Illiberalism: The Recurring Temptation of ‘National Democracy’ in Hungary and Poland—With Lessons for Europe. Warsaw: WiseEuropa.Google Scholar
  3. Balough, E. (2011). The Hungarian Right and Artistic Taste [Blog]. Hungarian Spectrum. Available at http://hungarianspectrum.org/2011/05/26/the-hungarian-right-and-artistic-taste.
  4. Basthy, A. (2017). Hungarian Academy of Arts Becomes the State’s Ideological Arm. Katoikos (online). Available at http://www.katoikos.eu/kaleidoscope/hungarian-academy-of-arts-becomes-the-states-ideological-arm.html.
  5. Bernhard, M., & Kubik, J. (Eds.). (2014). Twenty Years After Communism: The Politics of Memory and Commemoration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chaigneau, A. (2003). In Theorem: Theaters of East and West. Regard Sur L’Est, Dossier #35: East-West Cultural Networks (online). Available at http://www.artfactories.net/Theorem-East-west.htm.
  7. Creative Europe. (2018). Creative Europe Networks. Brussels: EU. Available at https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/sites/eacea-site/files/cebooklet2018_web_spread.pdf.
  8. Culture Action Europe. (2017). Creative Europe: Programme Analysis and Recommendations. Brussels: Culture Action Europe. Available at https://cultureactioneurope.org/files/2017/03/CAE_CreativeEuropeSurvey_Study_v2.pdf.
  9. European Commission. (2016). Joint Communication of the European Parliament and the European Council: Towards an EU Strategy for International Cultural Relations. JOIN(1026) 29 final. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52016JC0029&from=EN.
  10. European Commission. (2018). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A New European Agenda for Culture. COM(2018) 267 final. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/culture/sites/culture/files/commission_communication_-_a_new_european_agenda_for_culture_2018.pdf.
  11. European Union. (2016, June). European Union, Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe: A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy.Google Scholar
  12. Haines, J. R. (2014). Hungary’s “New Truth”. Foreign Policy Research Institute (online). Accessed Available at https://www.fpri.org/2014/09/hungarys-new-truth/.
  13. Hamvay, P. (2015). Megy a kukába - Az MMA költségvetése. Magyar Narancs. Available (in Hungarian) at http://magyarnarancs.hu/belpol/megy-a-kukaba-95820#.
  14. Hensel, A. (2017). Independent Theatre in the Post-Socialist Countries of Eastern Europe. In B. Brauneck & ITI Germany (Eds.), Independent Theatre in Contemporary Europe (pp. 165–274). Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  15. Higgott, R., & Proud, V. (2017). Populist-Nationalism and Foreign Policy; Cultural Diplomacy, International Interaction and Resilience. Stuttgart: ifa (Institut für Auslandsbeziehungen). Available at https://www.ifa.de/fileadmin/pdf/edition/higgott_proud_resilience_study.pdf.
  16. Jászay, T. (2013, June). Finita la Commedia: The Debilitation of Hungarian Independent Theatre. Critical Stages (8). Available at http://www.critical-stages.org/8/finita-la-commedia-the-debilitation-of-hungarian-independent-theatre-hungary/.
  17. Jászay, T. (2015). Independent Theatre in Hungary: Independence at a Cost. HowlRound (online). Available at http://howlround.com/independent-theatre-in-hungary-independence-at-a-cost.
  18. Jiřík, J. (2016). Ochránci Dobrých Mravů? A2 3/2016. Czech Republic (online). Available at https://www.advojka.cz/archiv/2016/3/ochranci-dobrych-mravu or in English translation at http://politicalcritique.org/cee/poland/2016/defenders-of-propriety/.
  19. Logemann, D. (2017). On ‘Polish History’: Disputes Over the Museum of the Second World War in Gdańsk. Cultures of History Forum (online). Available at http://www.cultures-of-history.uni-jena.de/debates/poland/on-polish-history-disputes-over-the-museum-of-the-second-world-war-in-gdansk/.
  20. Neuen Volkspartei der Freiheitlichen Partei Österreichs. (2017). Zusammen. Für unser Österreich [Together, For Our Austria]. Regierungsprogramm 2017–2022.Google Scholar
  21. Official Journal of the European Union. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2012/C 326/02).Google Scholar
  22. Plipat, S. (2018). State of Artistic Freedom 2018. Denmark: Freemuse. Available at https://freemuse.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Freemuse-The-state-of-artistic-freedom-2018-online-version.pdf.
  23. Prawo i Sprawiedliwość. (2014). Program. Warsaw.Google Scholar
  24. Robinson, M. (2010). Making Adaptive Resilience Real. London: Arts Council England. Available at http://www.artscouncil.org.uk/advice-and-guidance/browse-advice-and-guidance/making-adaptive-resilience-real.
  25. Switala, R. (2017). Contemporary Theatre in Poland Under Fire: The Curse. Political Critique (online). Available at http://politicalcritique.org/cee/poland/2017/interview-curse-polish-theatre/.
  26. The Weaponisation of Culture. (2018). World Economic Forum Annual General Meeting. Switzerland.Google Scholar
  27. Tompa, A. (2017). And the Winner Is… Appointing Artistic Directors in Hungary. Polish Theatre Journal, 1–2/2017 (online). Available at http://www.polishtheatrejournal.com/index.php/ptj/article/view/120/622.
  28. Zakaria, F. (1997). The Rise of Illiberal Democracy. Foreign Affairs, 76(6), 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Virginia Proud
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for European Studies (IES)Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)BrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations