Advertisement

Reviewing Quality of Governance: New Perspectives and Future Research

  • Adam MastersEmail author
  • Hester Paanakker
  • Leo Huberts
Chapter

Abstract

In the concluding chapter, the editors address the central topics of the book as well as some lessons learnt on quality of governance. Public values do matter, but how do they relate (and conflict), with many actors involved in public governance, including at street level and in public-private networks? A broad panorama of values appears to be important for the quality of governance, but the interpretation of the values differs and context is always relevant (macro, meso, and micro). Thus, the work in progress and the chapter define an agenda for future research and offers food for thought for all levels of governance.

Keywords

Quality of governance Public values Governance values Research agenda 

References

  1. Albright, M. (2018). Fascism: A warning. New York, NY: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  2. Frederickson, H. G. (1996). The spirit of public administration. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Heclo, H., & Wildavsky, A. (1974). The private government of public money: Community and policy inside British politics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  5. Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy 30th ann. ed.: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  6. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652–667.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Rothstein, B. (2011). The quality of government: Corruption, social trust, and inequality in international perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Trommel, W. A. (2018). Veerkrachtig bestuur: Voorbij neoliberale drift en populistische kramp. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Boom Besterkunde.Google Scholar
  9. Van Ryzin, G. G. (2011). Outcomes, process, and trust of civil servants. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(4), 745–760.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq092CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Social Research and MethodsAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.Radboud UniversityNijmegenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations