Advertisement

The Future of University Internationalization

  • Catherine Yuan Gao
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Global Higher Education book series (PSGHE)

Abstract

The final chapter concludes the project and examines university internationalization’s future. Yuan argues that if university internationalization indeed has a future, it must shift its focus from structural to cultural diversity to fulfill higher education institutions’ cultural mission. In addition, Yuan points out the uncertainties that cloud the future of university internationalization and common challenges in achieving meaningful internationalization that face universities in all countries, such as international students’ learning experiences and outcomes, the conflicts between an international profile and national identity, and internationalization’s influences on social equity. The chapter concludes with a reflection on better performance measures for universities, which highlights that the fundamental difficulty in measuring a complex phenomenon rests in capturing the outcomes rather than the activities’ input and output.

References

  1. Alach, Z. (2017). The use of performance measurement in universities. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(2), 102–117.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-05-2016-0089.Google Scholar
  2. Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
  3. Asmar, C. (2005). Politicising student difference: The Muslim experience. In M. Tight (Ed.), International relations (pp. 129–157). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  4. Barron, P., Gourlay, L. J., & Gannon-Leary, P. (2010). International students in the higher education classroom: Initial findings from staff at two post-92 universities in the UK. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 34(4), 475–489.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chan, D. K. K. (2008). Revisiting post-colonial education development: Reflections on some critical issues. In M. Marson (Ed.), Comparative education bulletin: Special issue: Education and development in post-colonial societies (pp. 21–36). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Society of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  7. Chankseliani, M. (2018). Four rationales of HE internationalization: Perspectives of U.K. universities on attracting students from former Soviet countries. Journal of Studies in International Education, 22(1), 53–70.Google Scholar
  8. Chen, G.-M., & Starosta, W. J. (1997, January). A review of the concept of intercultural sensitivity. Human Communication, 1, 1–16.Google Scholar
  9. Chiu, C.-Y., Lonner, W. J., Matsumoto, D., & Ward, C. (2013). Cross-cultural competence: Theory, research, and application. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(6), 843–848.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022113493716.Google Scholar
  10. Choi, K. C. (2010). ‘Weep for Chinese university’: A case study of English hegemony and academic capitalism in higher education in Hong Kong. Journal of Education Policy, 25(2), 233–252.Google Scholar
  11. Conklin, W. (2004). A diversity case gold mine: The affirmative action amicus briefs. Diversity Factor, 12(1), 30–39.Google Scholar
  12. Curtis, B. (2008). The performance-based research fund: Research assessment and funding in New Zealand. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 6(2), 179–194.Google Scholar
  13. Fei, X.-T. (2015). Globalization and cultural self-awareness. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  14. Forrester, G. (2011). Performance management in education: Milestone or millstone? Management in Education, 25(5), 112–118.Google Scholar
  15. Ha, P. L. (2013). Issues surrounding English, the internationalisation of higher education and national cultural identity in Asia: A focus on Japan. Critical Studies in Education, 54(2), 160–175.Google Scholar
  16. Healey, N. M. (2017). Beyond ‘export education’: Aspiring to put students at the heart of a university’s internationalisation strategy. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 21(4), 119–128.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2017.1286399.Google Scholar
  17. Henderson-King, D., & Kaleta, J. A. (2000). Learning about social diversity: The undergraduate experience and intergroup tolerance. Journal of Higher Education, 71(2), 142–164.Google Scholar
  18. Hertig, H. P. (2016). Universities, rankings and the dynamics of global higher education: Perspectives from Asia, Europe and North America. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Huntington, S. P. (1993). The clash of civilizations? Foreign Affairs, 72(3), 22–49.Google Scholar
  20. Kallio, K.-M., & Kallio, T. J. (2014). Management-by-results and performance measurement in universities—Implications for work motivation. Studies in Higher Education, 39(4), 574–589.Google Scholar
  21. Kallio, K.-M., Kallio, T. J., & Grossi, G. (2017). Performance measurement in universities: Ambiguities in the use of quality versus quantity in performance indicators. Public Money & Management, 37(4), 293–300.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2017.1295735.Google Scholar
  22. Kehm, B., & de Wit, H. (2005). Internationalisation in higher education: European responses to the global perspective. Amsterdam: European Association for International Education (EAIE) and European Association for Institutional Research (EAIR).Google Scholar
  23. Kim, T. (2005). Internationalisation of higher education in South Korea: Reality, rhetoric, and disparity in academic culture and identities. Australian Journal of Education, 49(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
  24. Knight, J. (1997). Internationalisation of higher education: A conceptual framework. In J. Knight & H. de Wit (Eds.), Internationalisation of higher education in Asia Pacific countries (pp. 5–19). Amsterdam: EAIE.Google Scholar
  25. Kudo, K., Volet, S., & Whitsed, C. (2017). Thematic review: Intercultural relationship development at university: A systematic literature review from an ecological and person-in-context perspective. Educational Research Review, 20, 99–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.01.001.Google Scholar
  26. Liang, S.-M. (1921/1990). Substance of Chinese culture (SUBS-CC). In S. B. Zhang (Ed.), Liang Shuming quanji [Collections of Liang Shuming] (pp. 3–16). Jinan: Shandong People’s Press.Google Scholar
  27. Marginson, S. (2004). Don’t leave me hanging on the Anglophone. Higher Education Quarterly, 58(2/3), 74–113.Google Scholar
  28. Marope, P. T. M., & Wells, P. J. (2013). University rankings: The many sides of the debate. In P. T. M. Marope, P. J. Wells, & E. Hazelkorn (Eds.), Rankings and accountability in higher education: Uses and misuses (pp. 7–19). Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  29. Modell, S. (2003). Goals versus institutions: The development of performance measurement in the Swedish university sector. Management Accounting Research, 14(4), 333–359.Google Scholar
  30. Naidoo, R. (2007). Higher education as a global commodity: The perils and promises for developing countries. London: The Observatory on Borderless Higher Education.Google Scholar
  31. OECD (2017). Education at a glance 2017: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2017-en.
  32. Putnam, R. D. (2007). E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174.Google Scholar
  33. Rautiainen, A., & Järvenpää, M. (2012). Institutional logics and responses to performance measurement systems. Financial Accountability & Management, 28(2), 164–188.Google Scholar
  34. Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2014). Redefining academic mobility: From the pursuit of scholarship to the pursuit of revenue. In A. Maldonado-Maldonado & R. M. Basset (Eds.), The forefront of international higher education: A Festschrift in Honor of Philip G. Altbach (pp. 115–126). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Rothman, S., Lipset, S. M., & Nevitte, N. (2003). Racial diversity reconsidered. Public Interest, 151(Spring), 25–38.Google Scholar
  36. Scott, P. (2005). Universities and the knowledge economy. Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy, 43(3), 297–309.Google Scholar
  37. Scott, P. (2015). Dynamics of academic mobility: Hegemonic internationalisation or fluid globalisation. European Review, 23(1), 55–69.Google Scholar
  38. Segall, M. H., Dansen, P. R., Berry, J. W., & Poortinga, Y. H. (1990). Human behavior in global perspective: An introduction to cross-cultural psychology. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  39. Singh, M. (2011). Learning from China to internationalise Australian research education: Pedagogies of intellectual equality, ‘optimal ignorance’ and the ERA journal rankings. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48(4), 395–405.Google Scholar
  40. Spencer-Oatey, H., & Dauber, D. (2015). How internationalised is your university? From structural indicators to an agenda for integration (GlobalPAD Working Papers). Available at GlobalPAD Open House. http://www.warwick.ac.uk/globalpadintercultural.
  41. Teichler, U. (2009). Student mobility and staff mobility in the European higher education area beyond 2010. In B. K. Kehm, J. Huisman, & B. Stensaker (Eds.), The European higher education area: Perspectives on a moving target (pp. 183–201). Rotterdam and Taipei: Sense.Google Scholar
  42. Teichler, U. (2017). Internationalisation trends in higher education and changing role of international student mobility. Journal of International Mobility, 2015(1), 177–216.Google Scholar
  43. Wächter, B. (2008). Mobility and cooperation in the European higher education area. In K. Maria (Ed.), Beyond 2010: Priorities and challenges for higher education in the New Decade (pp. 13–42). Bonn: Lemmens.Google Scholar
  44. Wang, Y., Harding, R., & Mai, L.-W. (2012). Impact of cultural exposure on young Chinese students’ adaptation in a UK business school. Studies in Higher Education, 37(5), 621–639.Google Scholar
  45. Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
  46. Wood, T. E., & Sherman, M. J. (2001). Is campus racial diversity correlated with educational benefits? Academic Questions, 14(3), 72–88.Google Scholar
  47. Yang, R. (2011). Self and other in the Confucian cultural context: Implications of China’s higher education development for comparative studies. Springer Science + Business Media B.V. Retrieved from http://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv49014.
  48. Yonezawa, A., Kitamura, Y., Meerman, A., & Kuroda, K. (2014). Emerging international dimensions in east Asian higher education. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  49. Yonezawa, A., & Shimmi, Y. (2015). Transformation of university governance through internationalization: Challenges for top universities and government policies in Japan. Higher Education, 70(2), 173–186.Google Scholar
  50. Yu, Y., & Moskal, M. (2018). Missing intercultural engagements in the university experiences of Chinese international students in the UK. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2018.1448259.
  51. Yvonne, A., Lynne, M. H., & Nazneen, M. (1997). Ending the international-domestic dichotomy: New approaches to a global curriculum for the millennium. Journal of Social Work Education, 33(2), 389–401.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catherine Yuan Gao
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for International Research on EducationVictoria UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations