Study of Entrepreneurial Students’ Perceptions of the Impact of Digital Literacy Skills on Their Future Career: Evidence from Tunisian Higher Education

  • Souad Kamoun-ChoukEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1027)


Entrepreneurs need early access to information to seize the opportunities offered by the economic environment and avoid threats that could undermine their businesses. In the age of the internet economy, speed of access to information is dependent on the young entrepreneurs’ mastery of technological tools that promote access to the right information at the right time. The skills in digital literacy in terms of selection, interpretation and knowledge construction and also in terms of communication and insertion in the digital culture are essential to face the competition and to be competitive. The role of education is important here to prepare literate entrepreneurs.

By conducting a qualitative study using a focus group technique with entrepreneurship students at the Tunisian University level, we aimed to deeply explore: (1) the familiarity of the students with Digital Literacy, (2) students’ perception of the knowledge acquired through their education programs and if it seemed to them sufficient compared to the competences that they perceived as necessary for their future job as entrepreneurs. The results show that the concept and the skills it contains were a discovery for the students. The focus group was also an opportunity for students to collectively reflect on their training and their ability to launch themselves as future entrepreneurs.


Digital literacy Information literacy Competence Entrepreneurship Education 


  1. Amabile, T.M.: Social psychology of creativity: a componential conceptualization. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 45, 997–1013 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Association of Colleges and Research Libraries, American Library Association. Information literacy defined (2011).
  3. Baumol, W.: Entrepreneurship, Management, and the Structure of Payoffs. MIT Press, Cambridge (1993)Google Scholar
  4. Bawden, D.: Origins and concepts of digital literacy. In: Lankshear, C., Knobel, M. (eds.) Digital Literacies: Concepts, Policies and Practices, pp. 17–32. Peter Lang, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  5. Charreire Petit, S., Durieux, F.: Explorer et tester: les deux voies de la recherche. In: dans R.-A. Thiétart, Méthodes de recherche en management, (3ème éd.), Dunod, Paris, pp. 59–83 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. Cordell, R.M.: Information literacy and digital literacy: competing or complementary? Commun. Inf. Lit. 7(2), 177–183 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. Eshet-Alkali, Y., Amichai-Hamburger, Y.: Experiments in digital literacy. CyberPsychology Behav. 7(4), 421–429 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Evrard, Y., Pras, B., Roux, E.: Market, Études et recherches en marketing, 3ème édition. Dunod, Paris (2003)Google Scholar
  9. Gibbons, M.: Higher Education Relevance in the 21st Century. World Bank, Washington Accessed 17 Jan 2019
  10. Gilster, P.: Alphabétisation numérique. Wiley, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  11. Goldman, A.E.: La profondeur d’entretien du groupe. Journal du Marketing, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 61–68 (1962) (réimprimé dans Seibert, J., Wills, G. (eds.) Recherche en marketing: Lectures choisies, Penguin, Harmondsworth, Middlesex, pp. 266–271 (1970))Google Scholar
  12. Kamoun Chouk, S.: Veille anticipative stratégique: processus d’attention à l’environnement: application à des PMI tunisiennes. Thèse Grenoble 2 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. Kamoun Chouk, S.: Knowledge Management in Organizations. In: Proceedings of 13th International Conference, KMO 2018, Žilina, Slovakia, 6–10 August 2018 (2018)Google Scholar
  14. Lankshear, C., Knobel, M.: New Literacies: Changing Knowledge in the Classroom. Open University Press, Buckingham (2003)Google Scholar
  15. Lumpkin, G.T., Dess, G.G.: Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Acad. Manag. Rev. 21(1) (1996). ABI/INFORM Global p. 135Google Scholar
  16. Martin, A.: Literacies for the digital age. In: Martin, A., Madigan, D. (eds.) Digital Literacies for Learning, pp. 3–25. Facet, London (2006)Google Scholar
  17. Morgan, D.L.: Focus groups. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 22, 129–152 (1996). Scholar
  18. Morgan, G., Smircich, L.: The case for qualitative research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 5, 491–500 (1980). Gareth Morgan; Linda Smircich Academy of Management, ABI/INFORM GlobalCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Morris, M.H., Neumeyer, X., Kuratko, D.F.: A portfolio perspective on entrepreneurship and economic development. Small Bus. Econ. 45(4) (2015). Kelley School of Business Research Paper No. 16–9. SSRN
  20. Pawinun, P., Kemparaju, T.D.: The information literacy program: a case of digital libraries SRELS. J. Inf. Manage. 41(1), 67–78 (2004)Google Scholar
  21. Patel, P.C., Fiet, J.O.: Systematic search and its relationship to firm founding. Entrep. Theory Pract. 33(2), 501–526 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Perret, V., et Seville, M.: Fondements épistémologiques de la recherche. In: Thietart, R.A. (ed.) Recherche en Management, Dunod, pp. 13–33 (2007)Google Scholar
  23. Peterson, K.I.: L’influence du chercheur et sa procédure sur la validité des séances de groupe. à Mazze, E.M., Procédions groupés, l’association américaine de marketing, Chicago, pp. 146–8 (1975)Google Scholar
  24. Porter, M.E.: The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Free Press, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  25. Santanen, E.L., Briggs, R.O., de Vreede, G. J.: Causal relationships in creative problem solving: comparing facilitation interventions for ideation. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 20(4), 167–197 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schumpeter, J.A.: The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1911)Google Scholar
  27. Schumpeter, J.A.: Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, vol. 36, pp. 132–145. Harper & Row, New York (1942)Google Scholar
  28. Sharkey, J., Brandt, D.S.: Integrating technology literacy and information literacy. In: Rivoltella, P.C. (ed.) Digital Literacy: Tools and Methodologies for Information Society, pp. 85–97. IGI Global, Hershey (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stevenson, R.J. Hashim, S.: Variation in Diatom community structure among habitation sandy streams (1989). Scholar
  30. Stewart, D.W., Shamdasani, P.N., Rook, D.W.: Focus Groups: Theory and Practice, vol. 20, 2nd edn. (2007)Google Scholar
  31. Tynan, C., Drayton, J.L.: conduire d’entretien des groupes - un guide pour les utilisateurs de la première fois. Mark. Intell. Plan. 6(1), 5–9 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. UNESCO: A Global Framework of Reference on Digital Literacy Skills for Indicator 4.4.2, Information Paper No. 51 June 2018 UIS/2018/ICT/IP/51 (2018).
  33. Wheelen, T.L., Hunger, D.L.: Strategic Management and Business Policy. Addison-Wesley Publishing, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  34. Wong, P.K., Ho, Y.P., Autio, E.: Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: evidence from GEM data. Small Bus. Econ. 24, 335–350 (2005). Scholar
  35. Zammouri. Etude des perceptions des compétences en littératie informationnelle et littératie digitale pour la promotion de l’entrepreneuriat: cas des étudiants de mastère entrepreneuriat en Tunisie, mémoire de fin d’études en mastère de recherche en Sciences de Gestion, spécialité: Entrepreneuriat, supervisé par Kamoun Chouk Souad (2018)Google Scholar
  36. Zurkowski, P.G.: The Information Service Environment Relationships and Priorities, Related Paper No. 5., National Commission on Libraries and Information Science, Washington, DC., National Program for Library and Information Services (1974). Accessed Jan 2019

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ecole Supérieure de Commerce de Tunis, LIGUE Research LaboratoryCampus Universitaire de La ManoubaManoubaTunisie

Personalised recommendations