Advertisement

Extending the UTAUT2 Model to Understand the Entrepreneur Acceptance and Adopting Internet of Things (IoT)

  • Ahmad AbushakraEmail author
  • Davoud Nikbin
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1027)

Abstract

The aim of this empirical study is to explore and discuss the factors that affect entrepreneurs acceptance and adoption of the Internet of Things (IoT) using UTAUT2 model. The study data was collected using a survey that was distributed among Omani entrepreneurs in six months period. The results showed that the relationship between information technology knowledge and entrepreneurs acceptance and adoption of the IoT was supported, like most other hypothesized relationships in the study.

Keywords

Internet of Things (IoT) UTAUT2 IT knowledge Entrepreneurs Oman 

References

  1. 1.
    Tsai, C.-W., Lai, C.-F., Chiang, M.-C., Yang, L.T.: Data mining for Internet of Things: a survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 16, 77–97 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bekara, C.: Security issues and challenges for the IoT-based smart grid. Procedia Comput. Sci. 34, 532–537 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fantana, N., et al.: IoT applications—value creation for industry. In: Internet of Things: Converging Technologies for Smart Environments and Integrated Ecosystems, p. 153 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schlick, J., Ferber, S., Hupp, J.: IoT applications–value creation for industry. River Publisher, Aalborg (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Medaglia, C.M., Serbanati, A.: An overview of privacy and security issues in the Internet of Things. The Internet of Things, pp. 389–395. Springer, New York (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1674-7_38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weber, R.H.: Internet of Things-new security and privacy challenges. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 26, 23–30 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Khan, R., Khan, S.U., Zaheer, R., Khan, S.: Future internet: the internet of things architecture, possible applications and key challenges. In: 2012 10th International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology (FIT), pp. 257–260. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., Palaniswami, M.: Internet of Things (IoT): a vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 29, 1645–1660 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sundmaeker, H., Guillemin, P., Friess, P., Woelfflé, S.: Vision and challenges for realising the Internet of Things. Cluster Eur. Res. Projects Internet Things Eur. Commision 3, 34–36 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Uckelmann, D., Harrison, M., Michahelles, F.: An architectural approach towards the future internet of things. In: Uckelmann, D., Harrison, M., Michahelles, F. (eds.) Architecting the Internet of Things, pp. 1–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19157-2_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tan, L., Wang, N.: Future internet: the Internet of Things. In: 2010 3rd International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering (ICACTE), pp. V5-376–V375-380. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Haller, S., Karnouskos, S., Schroth, C.: The Internet of Things in an Enterprise Context. In: Domingue, J., Fensel, D., Traverso, P. (eds.) FIS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5468, pp. 14–28. Springer, Heidelberg (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00985-3_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peoples, C., Parr, G., McClean, S., Scotney, B., Morrow, P.: Performance evaluation of green data centre management supporting sustainable growth of the internet of things. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 34, 221–242 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhao, J., Zheng, X., Dong, R., Shao, G.: The planning, construction, and management toward sustainable cities in China needs the Environmental Internet of Things. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 20, 195–198 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gao, L., Bai, X.: A unified perspective on the factors influencing consumer acceptance of internet of things technology. Asia Pac. J. Market. Logistics 26, 211–231 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bandyopadhyay, K., Bandyopadhyay, S.: User acceptance of information technology across cultures. Int. J. Intercultural Inf. Manage. 2, 218–231 (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Luarn, P., Lin, H.-H.: Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking. Comput. Hum. Behav. 21, 873–891 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mathieson, K.: Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Inf. Syst. Res. 2, 173–191 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y., Xu, X.: Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q. 36, 157–178 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Said Al Shibli, S., Abushakra, A., Khan, D., Rahman, F.: Perception of Academic Staff Over Their Career Due to Technology Implementation at Sohar University (2018)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27, 425–478 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Teo, A.-C., Tan, G.W.-H., Ooi, K.-B., Hew, T.-S., Yew, K.-T.: The effects of convenience and speed in m-payment. Ind. Manage. Data Syst. 115, 311–331 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dwivedi, Yogesh K., Rana, Nripendra P., Chen, H., Williams, Michael D.: A meta-analysis of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). In: Nüttgens, M., Gadatsch, A., Kautz, K., Schirmer, I., Blinn, N. (eds.) TDIT 2011. IAICT, vol. 366, pp. 155–170. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24148-2_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    El-Masri, M., Tarhini, A.: Factors affecting the adoption of e-learning systems in Qatar and USA: extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2). Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 65, 743–763 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kamoun, F., Basel Almourad, M.: Accessibility as an integral factor in e-government web site evaluation: the case of Dubai e-government. Inf. Technol. People 27, 208–228 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Alalwan, A.A., Dwivedi, Y.K., Rana, N.P., Lal, B., Williams, M.D.: Consumer adoption of Internet banking in Jordan: examining the role of hedonic motivation, habit, self-efficacy and trust. J. Financ. Serv. Market. 20, 145–157 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhao, F., José Scavarda, A., Waxin, M.-F.: Key issues and challenges in e-government development: an integrative case study of the number one eCity in the Arab world. Inf. Technol. People 25, 395–422 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Williams, M.D., Rana, N.P., Dwivedi, Y.K.: The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): a literature review. J. Enterp. Inf. Manage. 28, 443–488 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    AlShihi, H.: E-government development and adoption dilemma: Oman case study. In: 6th International We-B (Working for e-Business) Conference (2005)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    AlAwadhi, S., Morris, A.: The use of the UTAUT model in the adoption of e-government services in Kuwait. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Proceedings of the 41st Annual, p. 219. IEEE (2008)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Al-Somali, S.A., Gholami, R., Clegg, B.: A stage-oriented model (SOM) for e-commerce adoption: a study of Saudi Arabian organisations. J. Manuf. Technol. Manage. 26, 2–35 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    HWA, L.J.: Antedecents and Outcome of Internet of Things Adoption: A Perspective of Public Listed Companies on Main Market Board of Bursa Malaysia (2015)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Luthra, S., Garg, D., Mangla, S.K., Berwal, Y.P.S.: Analyzing challenges to Internet of Things (IoT) adoption and diffusion: an Indian context. Procedia Comput. Sci. 125, 733–739 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hsu, C.-L., Lin, J.C.-C.: An empirical examination of consumer adoption of Internet of Things services: network externalities and concern for information privacy perspectives. Comput. Hum. Behav. 62, 516–527 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Karahoca, A., Karahoca, D., Aksöz, M.: Examining intention to adopt to internet of things in healthcare technology products. Kybernetes 47, 742–770 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tu, M.: An exploratory study of Internet of Things (IoT) adoption intention in logistics and supply chain management-a mixed research approach. Int. J. Logistics Manage. 12, 131–151 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Valmohammadi, C.: Examining the perception of Iranian organizations on Internet of Things solutions and applications. Ind. Commercial Training 48, 104–108 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dong, X., Chang, Y., Wang, Y., Yan, J.: Understanding usage of Internet of Things (IOT) systems in China: cognitive experience and affect experience as moderator. Inf. Technol. People 30, 117–138 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tarhini, A., El-Masri, M., Ali, M., Serrano, A.: Extending the UTAUT model to understand the customers’ acceptance and use of internet banking in Lebanon: a structural equation modeling approach. Inf. Technol. People 29, 830–849 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Oh, J.-C., Yoon, S.-J.: Predicting the use of online information services based on a modified UTAUT model. Behav. Inf. Technol. 33, 716–729 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Brown, S.A., Venkatesh, V.: A model of adoption of technology in the household: a baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle. Manage. Inf. Syst. Q. 29, 4 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Al-Momani, A.M., Mahmoud, M.A., Sharifuddin, M.: Modeling the adoption of internet of things services: a conceptual framework. Int. J. Appl. Res. 2, 361–367 (2016)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zhu, K., Kraemer, K., Xu, S.: Electronic business adoption by European firms: a cross-country assessment of the facilitators and inhibitors. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 12, 251–268 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Dimitrova, D.V., Chen, Y.-C.: Profiling the adopters of e-government information and services: the influence of psychological characteristics, civic mindedness, and information channels. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 24, 172–188 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Han, B., Wu, Y.A., Windsor, J.: User’s adoption of free third-party security apps. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 54, 77–86 (2014)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Khasawneh, S., Jalghoum, Y., Harfoushi, O., Obiedat, R.: E-government program in Jordan: from inception to future plans. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Issues (IJCSI) 8, 568 (2011)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Doolin, B., McQueen, B., Watton, M.: Internet strategies for established retailers: five case studies from New Zealand (2003)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lin, H.-F., Lee, G.-G.: Impact of organizational learning and knowledge management factors on e-business adoption. Manage. Decis. 43, 171–188 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: Partial least squares structural equation modeling: rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Plann. 46, 1–12 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Merhi, M.I.: Factors influencing higher education students to adopt podcast: an empirical study. Comput. Educ. 83, 32–43 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Venkatesh, V., Zhang, X.: Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: US vs. China. J. Glob. Inf. technology Manage. 13, 5–27 (2010)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Chu, T.-H., Chen, Y.-Y.: With good we become good: understanding e-learning adoption by theory of planned behavior and group influences. Comput. Educ. 92, 37–52 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Sawang, S., Sun, Y., Salim, S.A.: It’s not only what I think but what they think! The moderating effect of social norms. Comput. Educ. 76, 182–189 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Chen, Z., Xia, F., Huang, T., Bu, F., Wang, H.: A localization method for the Internet of Things. J. Supercomputing 63, 657–674 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Thong, J.Y.: An integrated model of information systems adoption in small businesses. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 15, 187–214 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of BusinessSohar UniversitySoharOman

Personalised recommendations