Advertisement

Quality Measurement in Sterilization Processes at Healthcare Organization in Colombia Using Six Sigma Metrics

  • Ivanhoe Rozo-RojasEmail author
  • Flor Nancy Díaz-PiraquiveEmail author
  • Mayra Samara Ordoñez-Díaz
  • Yasser de Jesús Muriel-Perea
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1027)

Abstract

The article’s aim is to focus on the application of Six Sigma to measure defects and identify improvement opportunities as part of knowledge management in the sterilization department in a Colombian private hospital. The methodology was established in three stages: Recognize, Define and Measure as an exploratory study using data from all instrument sterilized (N = n = 12.846).

Quality Management System’s information was considered to recognize the context because work team had not hired in the organization directly. Sigma level was calculated in three sterilization processes: autoclave, ethylene oxide and hydrogen peroxide using data from 2017 and 2018.

Outcomes of this study provides information about behavior of sterilization processes to establish a baseline based on the historical data. Furthermore, employees require improve their skills and competences in statistics and data processing.

Future works are related to reducing waste evidenced in excessive time of processing or storing, instrumental availability and knowledge management using lesson-learned in the processes as a result of Analyze and Control Stages of DMAIC cycle implementation.

Keywords

Six Sigma Sterilization Department Quality Improvement DMAIC 

References

  1. 1.
    Schiffers, H., Zaatreh, S., Mittelmeier, W., Bader, R.: Potential infection control risks associated with roaming healthcare industry representatives. J. Infect. Prevent. 17(1), 22–28 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carter, M.: Diagnosis: mismanagement of resources. OR/MS Today 29(2), 26–33 (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Van Klundert, J., Muls, P., Schadd, M.: Optimizing sterilization logistics in hospitals. Health Care Manage. Sci. 11, 23–33 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rutala, W., Weber, D.: Infection control: the role of disinfection and sterilization. J. Hosp. Infect. 43, S43–S55 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rozo, I., Díaz-Piraquive, F.N., Serrano, L.: Revisión de literatura de prácticas para evaluar la calidad del servicio en instituciones de salud: Hacia un enfoque de Lean Healthcare. Instituto Antioqueño de Investigación. 2nd edn., Medellín (2018)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Velasco, N., Barrera, D., Amaya, C.: Logística Hospitalaria: Lecciones y retos para Colombia. La salud en Colombia: Logros, retos y recomendaciones. Bogotá, Ediciones Uniandes (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gowen, C., Stock, G., Mcfadden, K.: Simultaneous implementation of Six Sigma and knowledge management in hospitals. Int. J. Prod. Res. 46(23), 6781–6795 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Migita, R., Yoshida, H., Rutman, L., Woodward, G.: Quality improvement methodologies: principles and applications in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatr. Clin. North Am. 65(6), 1283–1296 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hakimi, S., et al.: Application of Six-Sigma DMAIC methodology in plain yogurt production process. Int. J. Six Sigma 9, 562–578 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rozo, I., Díaz-Piraquive, F.N., Cárdenas, L.: Revisión de literatura de prácticas para evaluar la calidad del servicio en instituciones de salud: Hacia un enfoque de Lean Healthcare. Desarrollo e Innovación en Ingeniería. Instituto Antioqueño de Investigación, pp. 270–277 (2018)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rozo, I., Serrano, L., Díaz-Piraquive, F.N., Coronel, J.: Integración de herramientas de la metodología Lean Six Sigma y Sistemas de Gestión Normalizados para la eficiencia energética. Desafíos en Ingeniería: Investigación, Innovación y Desarrollo. Fundación Tecnológica Antonio Arévalo, pp. 187–205 (2018)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Godley, M., Jenkins, J.B.: Decreasing Wait Times and Increasing Patient Satis-faction. J. Nurs. Care Qual. (1) (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1097/ncq.0000000000000332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Srinivasan, K., Muthu, S., Prasad, N., Satheesh, G.: Reduction of paint line defects in shock absorber through Six Sigma DMAIC phases. Procedia Eng. 97, 1755–1764 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Antony, J., Gijo, E., Childe, S.: Case study in Six Sigma methodology: man-ufacturing quality improvement and guidance for managers. Prod. Planning Control 23(8), 624–640 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Barry, R., Murcko, A., Brubaker, C.: The Six Sigma Book for Healthcare. Health Administration Press, Chicago (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Choo, A., et al.: Method and context perspectives on learning and knowledge creation in quality management. J. Oper. Manage. 25, 918–931 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Anand, G., Ward, P., Tatikonda, M.: Role of explicit and tacit knowledge in Six Sigma projects: an empirical examination of differential project success. J. Oper. Manage. 28, 303–315 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Arumugam, V., Antony, J., Kumar, M.: Linking learning and knowledge creation to project success in Six Sigma projects: an empirical investigation. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 141, 388–402 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goh, T.: A strategic assessment of Six Sigma. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 18, 403–410 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee, K., Choi, B.: Six sigma management activities and their influence on corporate competitiveness. Total Qual. Manage. Bus. Excellence 17, 893–911 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Markarian, J.: Six Sigma: quality processing through statistical analysis. Plast. Add. Compd. 6, 28–31 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bertolaccini, L., Viti, A., Terzi, A.: The statistical point of view of quality: the Lean Six Sigma methodology. J. Thorac. Dis. 7, E66–E68 (2015)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Goh, T., Xie, M.: Statistical control of a Six Sigma Process. Qual. Eng. 15, 587–592 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    He, Y., Tang, X., Chang, W.: Technical decomposition approach of critical to quality characteristics for product design for Six Sigma. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 26, 325–339 (2010)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fischman, D.: Applying lean Six Sigma methodologies to improve efficiency, timeliness of care, and quality control in an internal medicine residency clinic. Qual. Manage. Health Care 19, 201–210 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Serrano, L.F., Rozo, I., Díaz-Piraquive, F.N., Bravo, E., González, R.: Design thinking application methodology for pediatric service innovation. Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. 877, 215–222 (2018)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rozo, I., Díaz-Piraquive, F.N., Ordoñez-Díaz, M., Ospina, L., Muriel, Y.J.: Risk management framework as technovigilance support at sterilization unit in the San Jose Hospital. Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. 877, 437–451 (2018)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Muriel, Y.J., Díaz-Piraquive, F.N., González-Crespo, R., Rozo, I.: Non profit institutions IT governance: private high education institutions in Bogota case. Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. 731, 254–269 (2017)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vega, M., Muriel-Perea, Y., Díaz-Piraquive, F.N., Rodríguez, L.: Análisis del entorno para la creación de una empresa de asesoría en el sistema de gestión de seguridad y salud en el trabajo. Desafíos en Ingeniería: Investigación, Innovación y Desarrollo. Fundación Tecnológica Antonio Arévalo, pp. 54–67 (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad Catolica de ColombiaBogotáColombia
  2. 2.Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la SaludBogotáColombia

Personalised recommendations