Advertisement

The SECI Model in Moroccan Context: A Case Study of Payment Solution Software Sector

  • Meriem TalaskouEmail author
  • Lhacen Belhcen
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1027)

Abstract

Von Krogh [33] has emphasized that knowledge management community claimed the universality of some models in application and conception, Nonaka’s SECI model is one of them. Organizational knowledge creation theory has revolutionized knowledge management discipline through visualizing the conversion of individual tacit knowledge to organizational tacit dissemination. Few voices stated that contextual elements influence the applicability of this model. Consequently, the paradigm of universality is called into question. This article explores, to what extent the four modes of SECI Model exist in the Arab context, particularly in Morocco. For that purpose we used a single case research design, we collected and analyzed rich information from semi-structured interviews, documentation, and taking notes during non-participant observation in a multinational Moroccan company (payment solution software sector), the findings related to the four modes namely socialization, externalization, combination and internalization were very pivotal, explained in details in the rest of the article.

Keywords

SECI model Culture Universality Organizational knowledge creation 

References

  1. 1.
    Andreeva, T., Ikhilchik, I.: Applicability of the SECI model of knowledge creation in Russian cultural context: theoretical analysis. Knowl. Process. Manag. 18(1), 56–66 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bennet, D., Bennet, A.: Engaging tacit knowledge in support of organizational learning. Vine 38(1), 72–94 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bray, D.A.: Literature Review - Knowledge Management Research at the Organizational Level, pp. 1–18. SSRN (2007). https://ssrn.com/abstract=991169
  4. 4.
    Brown, J.S., Duguid, P.: Organizing knowledge. Calif. Manag. Rev. 40(3), 90–111 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chappell, S.G.: Plato on Knowledge in the Theaetetus. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dalkir, K.: Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Jordan Hill (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davenport, T.H., Prusak, L.: Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business School Press, Brighton (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Easa, N.F.: Knowledge management and the SECI model: a study of innovation in the Egyptian banking sector, thesis, pp. 1–341 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fernandez, I., Sabherwal, R.: Organizational knowledge management: a contingency perspective. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 18(1), 23–55 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Glisby, M., Holden, N.: 1 management theory: the cultural embeddedness of Nonaka’s knowledge-creating company. Knowl. Process. Manag. 10(1), 29–36 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hofstede, G.: The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 14(2), 75–89 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Holden, N.: Cross-Cultural Management: A Knowledge Management Perspective. Pearson Education, Canada (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    HPS Homepage. https://www.hps-worldwide.com/about-hps. Accessed 14 Jan 2019
  14. 14.
    HPS’s annual report. https://www.hps-worldwide.com/investor-relations/annual-reports. Accessed 14 Jan 2019
  15. 15.
    Jones, K., Leonard, L.N.: From tacit knowledge to organizational knowledge for successful KM. In: King, W. (ed.) Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning, pp. 27–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0011-1_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kogut, B., Zander, U.: What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organ. Sci. 7(5), 502–518 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li, Y.-H., Huang, J.-W., Tsai, M.-T.: Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: the role of knowledge creation process. Ind. Mark. Manag. 38(4), 440–449 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Martin-de-Castro, G., López-Sáez, P., Navas-López, J.E.: Processes of knowledge creation in knowledge-intensive firms: empirical evidence from Boston’s Route 128 and Spain. Technovation 28(4), 222–230 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nonaka, I.: The Knowledge-Creating Company. Harvard Business Review. November–December. Google Scholar (1991)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nonaka, I.: A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. 5(1), 14–37 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nonaka, I., Byosiere, P., Borucki, C.C., Konno, N.: Organizational knowledge creation theory: a first comprehensive test. Int. Bus. Rev. 3(4), 337–351 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.: The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Long Range Plan. 4(29), 592 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., Byosiere, P.A: Theory of organizational knowledge creation: understanding the dynamic process of creating knowledge. In: Dierkes, M., Antal, A., Child, J., Nonaka, I. (eds.) Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge, Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nonaka, L., Takeuchi, H.: The Knowledge-Creating Company. Oxford University Press, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nonaka, I., von Krogh, G., Voelpel, S.: Organizational knowledge creation theory: evolutionary paths and future advances. Organ. Stud. 27(8), 1179–1208 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Payne, S.C., Huffman, A.H.: A longitudinal examination of the influence of mentoring on organizational commitment and turnover. Acad. Manag. J. 48(1), 158–168 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Polanyi, M.: The Tacit Dimension. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1966)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Results of Hofstede about Morocco. https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country/morocco/
  29. 29.
    Rice, J.L., Rice, B.S.: The applicability of the SECI model to multi-organisational endeavours: an integrative review. Int. J. Organ. Behav. 9(8), 671–682 (2005)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sanchez, R.: Knowledge Management and Organizational Competence. Oxford University Press, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schulz, M.: The uncertain relevance of newness: organizational learning and knowledge flows. Acad. Manag. J. 44(4), 661–681 (2001)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tsai, M.-T., Li, Y.-H.: Knowledge creation process in new venture strategy and performance. J. Bus. Res. 60(4), 371–381 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Von Krogh, G., Ichijo, K., Nonaka, I.: Enabling Knowledge Creation. Oxford University Press, New York (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Weir, D., Hutchings, K.: Cultural embeddedness and contextual constraints: knowledge sharing in Chinese and Arab cultures. Knowl. Process. Manag. 12(2), 89–98 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills (1984)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hassan II UniversityCasablancaMorocco

Personalised recommendations