Advertisement

Improvement on Subjective Weighing Method in Attribute Coordinate Comprehensive Evaluation Model

  • Xiaolin XuEmail author
  • Yan LiuEmail author
  • Jiali Feng
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1027)

Abstract

Attribute coordinate comprehensive evaluation model provides an evaluation method for allowing the evaluator to subjectively weigh the indexes of the evaluated object. Specifically, the process of weighing is implemented by rating the given sample data to reflect the evaluator’s psychological weight upon some indexes. However, if the evaluated object includes many indexes, it is difficult for the evaluator to intuitively judge and accurately rate the sample data, which causes the great possibilities of rating the samples randomly and further influencing the final evaluation results. To address the problem, the paper changes the quantitative rating mode into qualitative judgment, and then converts the qualitative judgment into psychological weight, and finally evaluates all objects by the attribute coordinate comprehensive evaluation method. The experiment result shows the effectiveness of the improved method.

Keywords

Subjective Weighing Attribute coordinate comprehensive evaluation Barycentric coordinate Local satisfactory solution Satisfaction 

References

  1. 1.
    Qian, G.: Research on the index weight of logistics integration in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region based on cloud models. J. Yunnan Univ. Fin. Econ. 34(6), 96–104 (2018)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ling, G.A.O., Li, J., Mu, H.: Stability evaluation method of surrounding rock based on cloud model and weight back analysis. Water Power 44(9), 42–46 (2018)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yang, T.-m., Li, J.-m., He, B.-f.: Drought evaluation model based on improved fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. J. Comput. Appl. 32(z2), 41–44 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tao, L., Shengyu, W.: Research on evaluation system of electricity market transaction in China based on gray relational grade analysis and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Ind. Technol. Econ. 37(9), 130–137 (2018)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang, S., Du, W.: Analysis on influence factors of train reentrant ability based on analytic hierarchy process. Railway Comput. Appl. 27(9), 13–16 (2018)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xu, X., Xu, G., Feng, J.: A kind of synthetic evaluation method based on the attribute computing network. In: IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing (GrC), pp. 644–647 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xu, G., Min, S.: Research on multi-agent comprehensive evaluation model based on attribute coordinate. In: IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing (GrC), pp. 556–562 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Xu, G., Xu, X.: Study on evaluation model of attribute barycentric coordinates. Int. J. Grid Distrib. Comput. 9(9), 115–128 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xu, X., Xu, G., Feng, J.: Study on updating algorithm of attribute coordinate evaluation model. In: Huang, D.-S., Hussain, A., Han, K., Gromiha, M.M. (eds.) ICIC 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10363, pp. 653–662. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63315-2_57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Xu, X., Xu, G.: Research on ranking model based on multi-user attribute comprehensive evaluation method. Appl. Mech. Mater. 644, 644–650 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xu, X., Xu, G.: A recommendation ranking model based on credit. In: IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing (GrC), pp. 569–572 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xu, G., Wang, L.: Evaluation of aberrant methylation gene forecasting tumor risk value in attribute theory. J. Basic Sci. Eng. 16(2), 234 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Xu, X., Liu, Y., Feng, J.: Attribute coordinate comprehensive evaluation model combining principal component analysis. In: Shi, Z., Pennartz, C., Huang, T. (eds.) ICIS 2018. IAICT, vol. 539, pp. 60–69. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01313-4_7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xu, X., Feng, J.: A quantification method of qualitative indices based on inverse conversion degree functions. In: Enterprise Systems Conference, pp. 261–264 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Shanghai Polytechnic UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Shanghai Maritime UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations