Public Innovation: Concept and Future Research Agenda

  • Lizeth Fernanda Serrano CárdenasEmail author
  • Yessika Lorena Vásquez González
  • Flor Nancy Díaz-Piraquive
  • Javier Eloy Guillot Landecker
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1027)


The complexity and uncertainty that increasingly characterize public issues in contemporary societies indicate the relevance of public innovation, which designates a collection of approaches for exploring, testing and validating new ideas that create added value for society. Despite its relevance, studies are still needed to go further in analyzing the literature built on the subject, and to identify new research agendas that can generate inputs to translate theories into practice. Hence, the purpose of this article is to analyze the concept of public innovation and establish a future research agenda about the topic, on the basis of a systematic literature review of documents published between 2004 and 2018 in the Web of Science® multi-disciplinary database. For this purpose, the data mining software Vantage Point® and the qualitative analysis software MAXQDA® were used to study 148 documents. The results show the need to deepen the construction of public innovation theory from the perspective of the actors who interact in its dynamics. Finally, from the methodological perspective, it was found relevant to study the topic using a triangulation of methods, and through developing longitudinal and comparative studies, in order to understand the conditioning factors and results of the network collaboration exercises implicit in public innovation processes.


Public innovation Trends Systematic literature review Research agenda 


  1. 1.
    Martínez-Nogueira, R.: La coherencia y la coordinación de las políticas públicas. Aspectos conceptuales y experiencias. Documento Final del Proyecto” Modernización del Estado”, en el marco del Préstamo BIRF (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agolla, J., Van, L., Burger, J.: An empirical investigation into innovation drivers and barriers in public sector organizations. Int. J. Innov. Sci. 8(4), 404–422 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schumpeter, J.: The Theory of Economic Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1934)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sørensen, E., Torfing, J.: Collaborative innovation in the public sector. Innov. J. Public Sect. Innov. J. 17(1), 1–14 (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hartley, J.: Innovation in governance and public services: past and present. Public Money Manage. 25(1), 27–34 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lewis, J.M., Ricard, L., Klijn, E.: How innovation drivers, networking and leadership shape public sector innovation capacity. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 84(2), 288–307 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Demircioglu, M., Audretsch, D.: Conditions for innovation in public sector organizations. Res. Pol. 46(9), 1681–1691 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kelly, G., Mulgan, G. and Muers, S.: Creating Public Value: An Analytical Framework for Public Service Reform (Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office) (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mazzucato, M.: Financing innovation: creative destruction vs. destructive creation. Ind. Corp. Change 22(4), 851–867 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cels, S., de Jong, J., Nauta, F.: Agents of Change: Strategies and Tactics for Social Innovation (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Valdivia, V.A., Ramírez-Alujas, Á.V.: Innovación en el sector público chileno: la experiencia y aprendizajes del laboratorio de gobierno. Revista de Gestión Pública 6(1), 43–80 (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aschhoff, B., Sofka, W.: Innovation on demand—Can public procurement drive market success of innovations? Res. Policy 38(8), 1235–1247 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Edler, J., Georghiou, L.: Public procurement and innovation—resurrecting the demand side. Res. Policy 36(7), 949–963 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Damanpour, F., Schneider, M.: Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: assessing the role of managers. J. public Adm. Res. Theory 19(3), 495–522 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rolfstam, M.: Public procurement as an innovation policy tool: the role of institutions. Sci. Public Policy 36(5), 349–360 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Arundel, A., Huber, D.: From too little to too much innovation? Issues in measuring innovation in the public sector. Struct. Change Econ. Dyn. 27, 146–159 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bugge, M., Bloch, C.: Between bricolage and breakthroughs—framing the many faces of public sector innovation. Publ. Money Manag. 36(4), 281–288 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bloch, C., Bugge, M.: Public sector innovation—from theory to measurement. Struct. Change Econ. Dyn. 27, 133–145 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Torugsa, N., Arundel, A.: Complexity of innovation in the public sector: a workgroup-level analysis of related factors and outcomes. Public Manage. Rev. 18(3), 392–416 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dosi, G.: Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. J. Econ. Lit. 26, 1120–1171 (1988)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nelson, R., Winter, S.: The Schumpeterian tradeoff revisited. Am. Econ. Rev. 72(1), 114–132 (1982)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liddle, J.: Innovation in the public sector: linking capacity and leadership-edited by Victor Bekkers, Jurian Edelenbos and Bram Steijn. Public Adm. 91(2), 511–513 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stewart Weeks, M., Kastelle, T.: Innovation in the public sector. Aust. J. Public Adm. 74(1), 63–72 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mulgan, G., Albury, D.: Innovation in the Public Sector. Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office, vol. 1, p. 40 (2003)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    De Vries, H., Bekkers, V.J.J.M., Tummers, L.: Innovation in the public sector: a systematic review and future research agenda. Public Adm. 94(1), 146–166 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Agolla, J., Van, L., Burger, J.: Public sector innovation drivers: a process model. J. Social Sci. 34(2), 165–176 (2013)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pollitt, C.: Innovation in the public sector: an introductory overview. In: Bekkers, V., Edelenbos, J., Steijn, B. (eds.) Innovation in the public sector, pp. 35–43. Palgrave Macmillan, London (2011). Scholar
  28. 28.
    De Vries, H., Tummers, L., Bekkers, V.: A stakeholder perspective on public sector innovation: why position matters. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 84(2), 269–287 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., Smart, P.: Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br. J. Manag. 14(3), 207–222 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Onwuegbuzie, A., Bustamante, R., Nelson, J.: Mixed research as a tool for developing quantitative instruments. J. Mixed Methods Res. 4(1), 56–78 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fink, A.: Conducting research literature reviews, 4th edn, p. 257p. Sage Publications Inc., California (2013)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Podsakoff, P., et al.: The influence of management journals in the 1980 s and 1990s. Strateg. Manage. J. 26(5), 473–488 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Crossan, M., Apaydin, M.: A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: a systematic review of the literature. J. Manage. Stud. 47(6), 1154–1191 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Clarivate Analytics. Platform Web of Science: Introduction (2018). Accessed 14 Nov 2018
  35. 35.
    Voorberg, W., Bekkers, V., Tummers, L.: A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Manage. Rev. 17(9), 1333–1357 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Arundel, A., Casali, L., Hollanders, H.: How European public sector agencies innovate: the use of bottom-up, policy-dependent and knowledge-scanning innovation methods. Res. Policy 44(7), 1271–1282 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Veeckman, C., Van Der Graaf, S.: The city as living laboratory: empowering citizens with the citadel toolkit. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 5(3), 6–17 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sørensen, E., Torfing, J.: Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector. Adm. Society 43(8), 842–868 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hartley, J., Sørensen, E., Torfing, J.: Collaborative innovation: a viable alternative to market competition and organizational entrepreneurship. Public Adm. Rev. 73(6), 821–830 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Fuglsang, L., Sørensen, F.: The balance between bricolage and innovation: management dilemmas in sustainable public innovation. Serv. Ind. J. 31(4), 581–595 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sørensen, E., Torfing, J.: Co-initiation of collaborative innovation in urban spaces. Urban Aff. Rev. 54(2), 388–418 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sørensen, E., Torfing, J.: Metagoverning collaborative innovation in governance networks. Am. Rev. Public Adm. 47(7), 826–839 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sørensen, E.: Enhancing policy innovation by redesigning representative democracy. Policy Polit. 44(2), 155–170 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Agger, A., Sørensen, E.: Managing collaborative innovation in public bureaucracies. Plan. Theory 17(1), 53–73 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sørensen, E.: Political innovations: innovations in political institutions, processes and outputs. Publ. Manag. Rev. 1–19 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Torfing, J.: Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector. Georgetown University Press, Washington (2016)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hartley, J.: Innovation in governance and public service: past and present. Publ. Money Manag. 25(1), 27–34 (2005)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Torfing, J., et al.: Interactive Governance: Advancing the Paradigm. Oxford University Press on Demand (2012)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Crosby, B.C., Thart, P., Torfing, J.: Public value creation through collaborative innovation. Public Manage. Rev. 19(5), 655–669 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Elsevier (2018). Accessed 15 Nov 2018
  51. 51.
  52. 52.
    Kattel, R.: What would Max Weber say about public-sector innovation? J. Public Adm. Policy 8(1), 9–19 (2015)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Schumpeter, J.A.: Th eorie der wirtschaft lichen Entwicklung. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin (1912)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Schumpeter, J.: Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (UK 1943) 5th edn. (1976). George Allan and Unwin, London (1942)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Pierce, J., Delbecq, A.: Organization structure, individual attitudes and innovation. Acad. Manage. Rev. 2(1), 27–37 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Thompson, V.: Bureaucracy and innovation. Adm. Sci. Q. 10(1), 1–20 (1965). Special Issue on Professionals in OrganizationsMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Roessner, J.D.: Incentives to innovate in public and private organizations. Adm. Soc. 9(3), 341–365 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Kingdon, J.: Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Little, Brown, Boston (1984)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Fagerberg, J.: Innovation—a guide to the literature. In: Fagerberg, J., et al. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford University Press (2005)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Porter, M.: Competitive Advantage. Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. The Free Press, New York (1985)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Damanpour, F.: The adoption of technological, administrative, and ancillary innovations: Impact of organizational factors. J. Manage. 13(4), 675–688 (1987)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Cohen, W., Levinthal, D.: Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm. Sci. Q. 35(1), 128–152 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Damanpour, F.: Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Acad. Manage. J. 34(3), 555–590 (1991)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Rogers, E.: The Diffusion of Innovation, 4th edn. The Free Press, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Rogers, E.: Diffusion of Innovations, 5th edn. Free Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Roberts, N., King, P.: Transforming Public Policy: Dynamics of Policy Entrepreneurship. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1996)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Amabile, T., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., Herron, M.: Assessing the work environment for creativity. Acad. Manage. J. 39(5), 1154–1184 (1996)Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Kanter, R.M.: The Change Masters. Corporate Entrepreneurs at Work. International Thompson Business Press, London; Boston (1996)Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Mulgan, G., Albury, D.: Innovation in the Public Sector. Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office, London (2003)Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Moore, H., Sparrow, M., Spelman, W.: Innovation in policing: from production lines to jobs shops. In: Altshuler, A.A., Behn, R.D. (eds.) Innovation in American Government. The Brookings Institution Press, Washington (1997). Chapter 12Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Brown, K; Osborne, S.: Managing Change and Innovation in Public Service Organizations. Routledge (2012)Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Meijer, A.: From hero-innovators to distributed heroism: an in-depth analysis of the role of individuals in public sector innovation. Public Manag. Rev. 16(2), 199–216 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Altshuler, A., Behn, R. (eds.): Innovation in American Government. Brookings, Washington (1997)Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Institution Bekkers, V., Edelenbos, J., Steijn, B. (eds.): Innovation in the Public Sector. Linking Capacity and Leadership. Palgrave MacMillan, Houndmills (2011)Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Osborne, S., Brown, L. (eds.): Handbook of Innovation in Public Services. Edward Elgar Publishing (2013)Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Teece, D.: Competition, cooperation, and innovation. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 18, 1–25 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Lundvall, B.: Product Innovation and User-Producer Interaction. Aalborg University Press, Aalborg, Denmark (1985)Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Edquist, C., Hommen, L.: Systems of innovation: Theory and policy for the demand side. Technol. Soc. 21, 63–79 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Katt el, R., Cepilovs, A., Drechsler, W., Kalvet, T., Lember, V., Tõnurist, P.: Can We Measure Public Sector Innovation? A Literature Review, LIPSE Project paper (2013)Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Sahni, N., Wessel, M., Christensen, C.: Unleashing breakthrough innovation in government. Stanford Soc. Innov. Rev. 11(3), 27–31 (2013)Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Lagunes Marin, H., Rubalcaba Bermejo, L.: External sources for innovation in public organisations. Serv. Ind. J. 35(13), 710–727 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Bugge, M., Bloch, C.: Between bricolage and breakthroughs—framing the many faces of public sector innovation. Public Money Manage. 36(4), 281–288 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Demircioglu, M., Audretsch, D.: Conditions for innovation in public sector organizations. Res. Policy 46(9), 1681–1691 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Light, P.: Sustaining Innovation: Creating Nonprofit and Government Organizations That Innovate Naturally. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1998)Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Hood, C., Peter, H.: Talking about government. Public Manage. Rev. 13(5), 641–658 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Cunningham, J., Kempling, J.: Implementing change in public sector organizations. Manage. Decis. 47(2), 330–344 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Mulgan, G.: Ready or not?: taking innovation in the public sector seriously. Nesta (2007)Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    OECD: Achieving Public Sector Agility at Times of Fiscal Consolidation, OECD Public Governance Reviews. OECD Publishing, Paris (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Bason, C.: Leading Public Sector Innovation: Co-creating for a Better Society. The Polity Press, London (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Von Hippel, E.: Democratizing Innovation. MIT Press (2005)Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Wagenaar, H., Wood, M.: The precarious politics of public innovation. Politics Gov. 6(1), 150–160 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    March, J.G., Olsen, J.P.: Rediscovering Institutions. Simon and Schuster, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Bekkers, V., Edelenbos, J., Steijn, B. (eds.): ‘An Innovative Public Sector? Embarking in the Innovation Journey’ in Innovation in the Public Sector. Linking Capacity and Leadership, pp. 197–221. Palgrave MacMillan, Houndmills (2011)Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Scupola, A., Zanfei, A.: Governance and innovation in public sector services: the case of the digital library. Gov. Inf. Q. 33(2), 237–249 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Bekkers, V., Tummers, L.: Innovation in the public sector: towards an open and collaborative approach. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 84(2), 209–213 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Ojasalo, J., Kauppinen, H.: Collaborative innovation with external actors: an empirical study on open innovation platforms in smart cities. Technol. Innov. Manage. Rev. 6(12), 12 (2016)Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Gascó, M.: Living labs: implementing open innovation in the public sector. Gov. Inf. Q. 34(1), 90–98 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Mcgann, M., Blomkamp, E., Lewis, J.M.: The rise of public sector innovation labs: experiments in design thinking for policy. Policy Sci. 51, 1–19 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Andersen, S., Jakobsen, M.: Political pressure, conformity pressure, and performance information as drivers of public sector innovation adoption. Int. Public Manage. J. 21(2), 213–242 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Van Acker, W., Bouckaert, G.: What makes public sector innovations survive? An exploratory study of the influence of feedback, accountability and learning. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 84(2), 249–268 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad Jorge Tadeo LozanoBogotáColombia
  2. 2.Universidad Católica de ColombiaBogotáColombia
  3. 3.Equipo de Innovación Pública (EiP), Dirección de Innovación y Desarrollo Empresarial, Departamento Nacional de PlaneaciónBogotáColombia

Personalised recommendations