Advertisement

Enabling Technologies of Industry 4.0 and Their Global Forerunners: An Empirical Study of the Web of Science Database

  • Mikkel Stein KnudsenEmail author
  • Jari Kaivo-oja
  • Theresa Lauraeus
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1027)

Abstract

Knowledge management in organizations brings many benefits for R&D operations of companies and corporations. This empirical study demonstrates the power of large database analyses for industrial strategies and policy. The study is based on the Web of Science database (Core Collection, ISI) and provides an overview of the core enabling technologies of Industry 4.0, as well as the countries and regions at the forefront of the academic landscape within these technologies. The core technologies and technologies of Industry 4.0 and Manufacturing 4.0 are: (1) Internet of Things and related technologies (2) Radio Frequency Identification (RFID), (3) Wireless Sensor Network (WSN), and (4) ubiquitous computing. It also covers (5) Cloud computing technologies, including (6) Virtualization and (7) Manufacturing as a Service (MaaS), and new (8) Cyber-physical systems, such as (9) Digital Twin-technology and (10) Smart & Connected Communities. Finally, important for the manufacturing integration Industry 4.0 enabling technologies are (11) Service Oriented Architecture (SOA), (12) Business Process Management (BPM), and (13) Information Integration and Interoperability. All these key technologies and technology drivers were analysed in this empirical demonstration of knowledge management.

Keywords

Industry 4.0 Web of Science Technology foresight 

References

  1. 1.
    World Economic Forum: The future of jobs: employment, skills and workforce strategy for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. World Economic Forum, Geneva, Switzerland (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brettel, M., Friederichsen, N., Keller, M., Rosenberg, M.: How virtualization, decentralization and network building change the manufacturing landscape: an Industry 4.0 perspective. Int. J. Inf. Commun. Eng. 8(1), 37–44 (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zezulka, F., Marcon, P., Vesely I., Sajdl, O.: Industry 4.0 – an introduction in the phenomenon. IFAC PapersOnLine 49-25, 008-012 (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Roblek, V., Mesko, M., Krapez, A.: A complex view of Industry 4.0. SAGE Open 6, 1–11 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Di Fatta, D., Roblek, V., Dominici, G.: Knowledge management in cyberphysical systems: determining the quality requirements for health systems with the KANO model. Int. J. Mark. Bus. Syst. 3(2), 163–180 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Foresti, F., Varvakis, G.: Ubiquity and Industry 4.0. In: North, K., Maier, R., Haas, O. (eds.) Knowledge Management in Digital Change. Progress in IS, pp. 343–358. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73546-7_21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Müller, J.M., Buliga, O., Voight, K.-I.: Fortune favors the prepared: how SMEs approach business model innovations in Industry 4.0. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 132, 2–17 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lu, Y.: Industry 4.0: a survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 6, 1–10 (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hoffman, E., Rüsch, M.: Industry 4.0 and the current status as well as future prospects on logistics. Comput. Ind. 89, 23–34 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pereira, A.C., Romero, F.: A review of the meanings and implications of the Industry 4.0 concept. Procedia Manuf. 13, 1206–1214 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Muhuri, P.K., Shukla, A.K., Abraham, A.: Industry 4.0: a bibliometrics analysis and detailed overview. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 79, 218–235 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oesterreich, T.D., Teuteberg, F.: Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of Industry 4.0: a triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry. Comput. Ind. 83, 121–139 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lichtblau, K., Stich, V., Bertenrath, R., Blum, R., Bleider, M., Millack A., et al.: IMPULS, Industry 4.0 readiness. VDMA (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Oztemel, E., Gursev, S.: Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies. J. Intell. Manuf. 1–56 (2018, in press)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Posada, J., et al.: Visual computing as a key enabling technology for Industrie 4.0 and industrial internet. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 35(2), 26–40 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cheng, G., Liu, L., Qiang, X., Liu, Y.: Industry 4.0 development and application of intelligent manufacturing. In: International Conference on Information Systems and Artificial Intelligence (ISAI). IEEE Xplore (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xu, L.D., Xu, E.L., Li, L.: Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends. Int. J. Prod. Res. 56(8), 2941–2962 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Knudsen, M.S., Kaivo-oja, J.: Are we in the midst of a fourth industrial revolution? New Industry 4.0 insights from future technology analysis professionals. FFRC-blog, 20 August 2018. https://ffrc.wordpress.com/2018/08/20/are-we-in-the-midst-of-a-fourth-industrial-revolution/
  19. 19.
    Molano, J.I.R., Lovelle, J.M.C., Montenegro, C.E., Granados, J.J.R., Crespo, R.G.: Metamodel for integration of Internet of Things, social networks, the cloud and Industry 4.0. J. Ambient Intell. Hum. Comput. 9, 709–723 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Qi, Q., Tao, F.: Digital twin and big data towards smart manufacturing and Industry 4.0: 360 degree comparison. IEEE Access 6, 3585–3593 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kagermann, H., Helbig, J., Hellinger, A., Wahlster, W.: Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0, Munich (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Grieves, M., Vickers, J.: Digital twin: mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems. In: Kahlen, F.-J., Flumerfelt, S., Alves, A. (eds.) Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems, pp. 85–113. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Falagas, M.E., Pitsouni, E.I., Malietzis, G.A., Pappas, G.: Comparison of PubMed, web of science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 22, 338–342 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kaivo-Oja, J., Knudsen, M.S., Lauraeus, T.: Reimagining Finland as a manufacturing base: the nearshoring potential of Finland in an Industry 4.0 perspective. Bus. Manage. Educ. 16, 65–80 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mikkel Stein Knudsen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jari Kaivo-oja
    • 1
    • 2
  • Theresa Lauraeus
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Finland Futures Research CentreUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland
  2. 2.Kazimieras Simonavicius UniversityVilniusLithuania

Personalised recommendations