Advertisement

World Changing Scenario of Urethral Stricture Management

  • Kuncoro Adi
  • Faisal Alhajeri
  • Paksi Satyagraha
Chapter

Abstract

Urethral stricture management remains a great challenge in the urological community. History has shown that the first approach to urethral strictures were to do open reconstructive surgery. Gradually the management changed to minimal invasive surgery but then reverted back to open reconstructive surgery with refined technique and an improvement in medical services. During the past 30 years it has been shown that most urethral strictures are curable with open urethral reconstructive surgery. Despite evidence and international guidelines, internal urethrotomy and dilatation is still practiced by the urological community. A better understanding of the optimal place for minimal invasive surgery in urethral stricture disease should be spread among the urological community. The concept that urethral stricture disease treatment should always start at the bottom with dilatation and or internal urethrotomy and work up the ladder to open reconstructive surgery as the last resort has changed. We aim to provide an overview of the contemporary management of urethral stricture disease from a historical perspective. We will discuss the changing patterns in the last three to four decades and provide evidence and international guideline recommendations about the best treatment option for patients with urethral stricture disease.

Keywords

Urethral stricture Urethrotomy Direct visual internal urethrotomy Urethroplasty 

References

  1. 1.
    Enzo P, Elisa B, et al. Contemporary urethral stricture characteristic in the developed world. Urol. 2013;81:191–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mundy AR, Andrich DE. Urethral strictures. BJU Int. 2011;107:6–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Santucci RA, Joyce GF, Wise M. Male urethral stricture disease. J Urol. 2007;177:1667–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daniel M, Stein D, et al. A geographic analysis of male urethral stricture aetiology and location. BJU Int. 2013;112:830–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Amjad A, Sarah D, et al. Epidemiology of urethral stricture. Transl Androl Urol. 2014;3(2):209–2013.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brandes SB. Epidemiology, etiology, histology, classification, and economic impact of urethral stricture disease. 2nd ed. Totowa: Humana Press; 2008.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yue-min X, Song L-J, et al. Changing trends in the causes and management of male urethral stricture diseases in China: an observational descriptive study from 13 centres. BJU Int. 2015;116:938–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fenton AS, Morey AF, Aviles R, et al. Contemporary urethral stricture characteristics. Urology. 2005;65:1055–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Irekpita E. A 10-year review of urethral stricture management in Irrua, Nigeria. Niger J Surg. 2017;23:119–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tijani KH, Adesanya AA, Ogo CN. The new pattern of urethral stricture disease in Lagos, Nigeria. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2009;16:162–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Santucci RA, Eisenberg L. Urethrotomy has a much lower success rate than previously reported. J Urol. 2010;183:1859–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Santucci RA. Should we centralize referrals for repair of urethral stricture? J Urol. 2009;182:1259–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Waxman SW, Morey AF. Management of urethral stricture. Lancet. 2006;367:1379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Andrich DE, Mundy AR. What is the best technique for urethroplasty? Eur Urol. 2008;54:1031–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guido B, Salvatore S, et al. Current controversies in reconstructive surgery of the anterior urethra: a clinical overview. Int Braz J Urol. 2012;38:307–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goel A, Jain A, Singh BP. Management of panurethral strictures. Indian J Urol. 2011;27:378–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wessel H, Keith WA, Elliott S, et al. Male urethral stricture: American urological association guideline. J Urol. 2016;197:182–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jordan G, Chapple C, Heyns C. An international consultation on urethral strictures. October 13–16, 2010; Morocco: Marrakech. Available online: http://www.siu-urology.org/themes/web/assests/files/ICUD/pdf/urethral_strictures_2010.pdf
  19. 19.
    Cavalvanti AG, Fiedler G. Substitution urethroplasty or anastomotic urethroplasty for bulbar stricture? Or endoscopic urethrotomy? Int Braz J Urol. 2015;41(4):619–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Devereux MH, Burfield GD. Prolonged follow-up of urethral stricture treated by intermittent dilatation. Brit J Urol. 1970;42:321–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schultheiss D, Truss MC, Jonas U. History of direct vision internal urethrotomy. Urology. 1998;52(4):729–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chilton CP, Shah PJR, Fowler CG, Tiptat RC, Blandy JP. The impact of optical urethrotomy on the management of urethral strictures. Br J Urol. 1983;55:705–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pansadoro V, Emiliozzi P. Internal urethrotomy in the management of anterior urethral stricture: long-term follow up. J Urol. 1996;156:73–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Heyns CF, Steenkamp JW, De Kock ML, et al. Treatment of male urethral strictures: is repeated dilatation or internal urethrotomy useful? J Urol. 1996;160(2):356–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chapple C. Anterior urethral surgery: current concepts and future direction. Eur Urol. 2010;58:42–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Horiguchi A, Shinchi M, Masunaga A, et al. Do transurethral treatment increase the complexity of urethral stricture? Urology. 2017;199:508–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wright JL, Wessells H, Nathen AB, Hollingworth W. What is the most cost-effective treatment for 1 to 2 cm bulbar urethral stricture: societal approach using decision analysis. Urology. 2006;67:889–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wong SS, Aboumarzouk OM, Narahari R, et al. Simple dilatation, endoscopic urethrotomy, and urethroplasty for urethral stricture disease in adult men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:CD006934.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Christopher JH, Osman NI, Chapple CR. Current trend in urethral stricture management. Asian J Urol. 2014;1:46–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cotta BH, Buckley JC. Endoscopic treatment of urethral stenosis. Urol Clin N Am. 2017;44:19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Djordjevic ML. Treatment of urethral disease by internal urethrotomy, dilatation, or stenting. Eur Urol. 2016;S15:7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hampson LA, McAninch JW, Breyer BN. Male urethral stricture and their management. Nat Rev Urol. 2014;11:43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Barbagli G, Balo S, Montorsi F, et al. History and evolution of the use of oral mucosa for urethral reconstruction. Asia J Urol. 2017;4(2):96–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Desai D, Joshi P, Orabi H, et al. Evolution of innovation: historical perspective on the management of urethral stricture disease. J Urol. 2017;197(4S):e1072.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Barbagli G. History and evolution of transpubic urethroplasty: a lesson for young urologist in training. Eur Urol. 2007;52:1290–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bayne DB, Gaither TW, Awad MA, et al. Guidelines of guideline: a review of urethral stricture evaluation, management, and follow-up. Trans Andr and Urol. 2017;6(2):288–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Launonen E, Sairanen J, Ruutu M, et al. Role of visual internal urethrotomy in pediatric urethral stricture. J Pediatr Urol. 2014;10:545–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Barbagli G, Kulkarni SB, Fossati N, et al. Long-term follow-up and deterioration rate of anterior substitution urethroplasty. J Urol. 2014;192:808–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cooperberg MR, McAninch JW, Alsikafi NF, et al. Urethral reconstruction for traumatic posterior urethral disruption: outcomes of a 25-year experience. J Urol. 2007;178:2006–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Barbagli G, De Angelis M, Romano G, et al. Long term follow-up of bulbar end-to-end anastomosis: a retrospective analysis of 153 patients in a single center experience. J Urol. 2007;178:2470–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kuncoro Adi
    • 1
  • Faisal Alhajeri
    • 2
  • Paksi Satyagraha
    • 3
  1. 1.Padjadjaran University, AMC Hasan Sadikin Hospital, Urology DepartmentBandungIndonesia
  2. 2.Farwaniya Hospital-State of KuwaitSabah Al NasserKuwait
  3. 3.Brawijaya University, AMC Saiful Anwar Hospital, Urology DepartmentMalangIndonesia

Personalised recommendations