Advertisement

The Demosprudential Ombud in Practice

  • Margaret DoyleEmail author
  • Nick O’Brien
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter turns from theory to practice by considering ways in which response to citizen grievance, whether by progressive judicial intervention or ombud practice, has already begun to conform to demosprudential values. In particular, the chapter considers public interest litigation in India, the operation of the ombud in Argentina as a ‘horizontal accountability mechanism’ and of the ombud in Greece as an instrument of equality and non-discrimination, and the systemic interventions of public-sector ombuds in the UK. The chapter also identifies the importance of mediation, of an ethic of care and of compassion as means of giving full expression to the values of community, network and openness.

Keywords

Demosprudence Public interest litigation Horizontal accountability mechanism Mediation 

References

  1. Berman, G., & Feinblatt, J. (2001). Problem-Solving Courts: A Brief Primer. New York: Center for Court Innovation.Google Scholar
  2. Chayes, A. (1976). The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation. Harvard Law Review, 89, 1281–1316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Constenla, C. (2013). Del Monte Sacro a Salvador de Bahia: Sobre quien podria ser el Defensor del Pueblo. Revista de la Asociacion de Derecho Administrativo de la Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, 5, 195–208.Google Scholar
  4. Constenla, C. (2014). Defensor del Pueblo: un enemigo del pueblo? Eforos, Publicacion Semestral del Instituto Latinoamericano del Ombudsman-Defensor del Pueblo, June–December, 21–30.Google Scholar
  5. Constenla, C. (2015). El Defensor del Pueblo in Latin America. Visioni Latino-Americane, 12, 59–72.Google Scholar
  6. Dorf, M., & Sabel, C. (1998). A Constitution of Democratic Experimentalism. Columbia Law Review, 98, 267–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fredman, S. (2008). Human Rights Transformed: Positive Rights and Positive Duties. Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Greek Ombudsman. (2005). Annual Report. Athens: Greek Ombudsman.Google Scholar
  9. Greek Ombudsman. (2007). Annual Report. Athens: Greek Ombudsman.Google Scholar
  10. Greek Ombudsman. (2008). Promoting Equal Treatment: The Greek Ombudsman as National Equality Body. Athens: Greek Ombudsman.Google Scholar
  11. Greek Ombudsman. (2009). Equal Treatment of Men and Women in Employment and Labour Relations. Athens: Greek Ombudsman.Google Scholar
  12. Guinier, L. (2013). Courting the People: Demosprudence and the Law/Politics Divide. Harvard Law Review, 127(423), 437–444.Google Scholar
  13. Guinier, L., & Torres, G. (2014). Changing the Wind: Notes towards a Demosprudence of Law and Social Movements. Yale Law Journal, 123, 2742–2804.Google Scholar
  14. Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (2004). Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hampshire, S. (2000). Justice is Conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harlow, C., & Rawlings, R. (2007). Promoting Accountability in Multilevel Governance: A Network Approach. European Law Journal, 13, 542–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Herring, J. (2013a). Forging a Relational Approach: Best Interests or Human Rights? Medical Law International, 13(1), 32–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Herring, J. (2013b). Caring and the Law. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
  19. Herring, J. (2017). Compassion, Ethics of Care and Legal Rights. International Journal of Law in Context, 13(2), 158–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hertogh, M. (2001). Coercion, Co-operation and Control: Understanding the Policy Impact of Administrative Courts and the Ombudsman in the Netherlands. Law and Policy, 23, 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Karydis, V. (2011). The Greek Equality Body in the Spotlight. Brussels: Equinet.Google Scholar
  22. Khilnani, S., Raghavan, V., & Thiruvengadam, A. (2012). Revisiting the Role of the Judiciary in Plural Societies. In S. Khilnani, V. Raghavan, & A. Thiruvengadam (Eds.), Comparative Constitutionalism in South Asia. New Delhi: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Klein, A. (2007). Judging as Nudging: New Governance Approaches for the Enforcement of Constitutional Social and Economic Rights. Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 39, 351–422.Google Scholar
  24. Manzini, E. (2015). Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Marin, A. (2006). Innovate or Perish. Canadian Journal of Administrative Law and Practice, 20, 101–115.Google Scholar
  26. McMillan, J. (2009). The Ombudsman’s Role in Human Rights Protection—An Australian Perspective. Paper to the Eleventh Asian Ombudsman Association Conference, Bangkok, 2–5 November 2009.Google Scholar
  27. Menkel-Meadow, C (2004/2005). The Lawyer’s Role(s) in Deliberative Democracy. Nevada Law Journal, 5, 347–369.Google Scholar
  28. Menkel-Meadow, C. (2006, Winter). Deliberative Democracy and Conflict Resolution: Two Theories and Practices of Participation in the Polity. Dispute Resolution Magazine, pp. 18–22.Google Scholar
  29. Menkel-Meadow, C. (2011). Scaling Up Deliberative Democracy as Dispute Resolution in Healthcare Reform: A Work in Progress. Law and Contemporary Problems, 74(1), 1–30.Google Scholar
  30. Nussbaum, M. (2004). Hiding from Humanity: Disgust, Shame, and the Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Nussbaum, M. (2013). Political Emotions: Why Love Matters for Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Nussbaum, M. (2018). The Monarchy of Fear: A Philosopher Looks at our Political Crisis. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  33. O’Brien, N. (2011). Law and “The Good Life”: Learning Disability, Equality and Healthcare in the UK. The Equal Rights Review, 6, 83–96.Google Scholar
  34. O’Brien, N. (2016). Disability Discrimination Law in the United Kingdom and the New Civil Rights History: The Contribution of Caroline Gooding. Journal of Law and Society, 43(3), 444–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. O’Brien, N. (2018). Ombudsmen and Public Authorities: A Modest Proposal. In M. Hertogh & R. Kirkham (Eds.), Research Handbook on The Ombudsman. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  36. O’Donnell, G. (2007). Dissonances: Democratic Critiques of Democracy. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
  37. Pegram, T. (2008). Accountability in Hostile Times: The Case of the Peruvian Human Rights Ombudsman 1996–2001. Journal of Latin American Studies, 40, 51–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pegram, T. (2013). The Bolivian Human Rights Ombudsman and Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. In E. Brems, G. de Beco, & W. Vandenhole (Eds.), National Human Rights Institutions, and Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Antwerp: Intersentia.Google Scholar
  39. Peruzzotti, E. (2012). The Societalization of Horizontal Accountability: Rights Advocacy and the Defensor del Pueblo de la Nacion in Argentina. In R. Goodman & T. Pegram (Eds.), Human Rights, State Compliance, and Social Change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
  40. Public Administration Select Committee (PASC). (2014). Time for a People’s Ombudsman. Fourteenth Report of Session 2013–14. London: House of Commons.Google Scholar
  41. Ray, B. (2011). Demosprudence in Comparative Perspective. Stanford Journal of International Law, 47, 111–173.Google Scholar
  42. Rosanvallon, P. (2008). Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust. Cambridge: CUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sabel, C., & Simon, W. (2004). Destabilization Rights: How Public Law Litigation Succeeds. Harvard Law Review, 117, 1016–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sachs, A. (2009). The Strange Alchemy of Life and Law. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  45. Sennett, R. (2018). Building and Dwelling. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  46. Simon, W. (2004). Solving Problems v Claiming Rights: The Pragmatist Challenge to Legal Liberalism. William and Mary Law Review, 46, 127–212.Google Scholar
  47. Simon, W. (2009). The Warren Court, Legalism and Democracy: Sketch for a Critique in a Style Learned from Morton Horwitz. Columbia Law School, Public Law and Legal Theory Working Group Paper No. 09-196.Google Scholar
  48. Spanou, C. (2013). The Greek Ombudsman and Public Administration during Challenging Times. 13th Annual Lecture of the Hellenic Observatory, European Institute, London School of Economics, 25 November 2013. Retrieved from www.macropolis.gr.
  49. Tyndall, P., Mitchell, C., & Gill, C. (2018). Value for Money. London: PHSO.Google Scholar
  50. Vanhala, L. (2011). Making Rights a Reality? Disability Rights Activists and Legal Mobilization. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
  51. Zacka, B. (2017). When the State Meets the Street: Public Service and Moral Agency. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of EssexLondonUK
  2. 2.University of LiverpoolStockportUK

Personalised recommendations