Advertisement

A Social Democratic Vision

  • Margaret DoyleEmail author
  • Nick O’Brien
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter considers the social democratic origins of post-war administrative justice and human rights. It emphasises the relevance of administrative justice to ordinary daily life and its importance as a set of principles that govern the relationship between individual citizens and the democratic state. It identifies the social rights entitlements to health, social care, education and housing as integral to the post-war human rights vision, and touches upon the way in which the devolved legislatures in Scotland and Wales have begun to reinstate that vision. It proposes the ‘relational’ character of both administrative justice and human rights as central and a ‘duty of active kindness’ as critical to their realisation.

Keywords

Social democracy Citizenship Devolution Relationship Kindness 

References

  1. Adler, M. (Ed.). (2010). Administrative Justice in Context. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
  2. Adler, M. (2012). The Rise and Fall of Administrative Justice—A Cautionary Tale. Socio-Legal Review, 8, 29–54.Google Scholar
  3. Ambedkar, B. R. (2010). Speech Delivered on 25 November 1949. In B. Das (Ed.), Thus Spoke Ambedkar. New Delhi: Navayana Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Ben Jelloun, T. (2016). By Fire: Writings on the Arab Spring (R. S. Nezami, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Berlin, I. (1969). Two Concepts of Liberty. In I. Berlin (Ed.), Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  6. Busck, L. (1995). The History and Development of the Institution of Ombudsman. In H. Gammeltoft-Hansen (Ed.), The Danish Ombudsman. Copenhagen: The Danish Ombudsman.Google Scholar
  7. Cassin, R. (1972). La Pensee et l’Action. Boulogne: F Lalou.Google Scholar
  8. Crossman, R. (1956). Socialism and the New Despotism. London: Fabian Society.Google Scholar
  9. Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC). (2017). Following Grenfell: The Human Rights and Equality Dimension. Statement from the Equality and Human Rights Commission.Google Scholar
  10. Feldman, D. (2010). Changes in Human Rights. In M. Adler (Ed.), Administrative Justice in Context. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
  11. Gearty, C. (2006). Can Human Rights Survive? Cambridge: CUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Glendon, M. (2001). A World Made New: Eleanor Roosevelt and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  13. Herring, J. (2017). Compassion, Ethics of Care and Legal Rights. International Journal of Law in Context, 13(2), 158–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hilson. (2008). The Nordic Model: Scandinavia since 1945. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Holm, N. E. (1995). The Ombudsman—A Gift from Scandinavia to the World. In H. Gammeltoft-Hansen (Ed.), The Danish Ombudsman. Copenhagen: The Danish Ombudsman.Google Scholar
  17. Laverty, P., & Loach, K. (2016). I, Daniel Blake. Pontefract: Route Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Leggatt, S. A. (2001). Tribunals for Users—One System, One Service. London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  19. Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman (LGSCO). (2018). Annual Report 2017–18. London: LGSCO.Google Scholar
  20. Malik, C. (1968). Introduction. In O. Nolde (Ed.), Free and Equal: Human Rights in Ecumenical Perspective. Geneva: World Council of Churches.Google Scholar
  21. Marshall, T. H. (1992). Citizenship and Social Class. In T. H. Marshall & T. Bottomore (Eds.), Citizenship and Social Class. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  22. Ministry of Justice. (2017). Tribunals and Gender Recognition Certificate Statistics Quarterly July–September 2017.Google Scholar
  23. Ministry of Justice. (2018). Tribunals and Gender Recognition Certificate Statistics Quarterly April–June 2018.Google Scholar
  24. Morris Jones, W. H. (1949). Socialism and Bureaucracy. London: Fabian Society.Google Scholar
  25. Mullen, T. (2017). Access to Justice in Administrative Law and Administrative Justice. In E. Palmer et al. (Eds.), Austerity and Access to Justice. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  26. Nason, S. (2018). Administrative Justice: Wales’ First Devolved Justice System: Evaluation and Recommendations. Bangor University.Google Scholar
  27. Newton, L. (2010). House of Lords Hansard, 29 November 2010, Col. 1325.Google Scholar
  28. O’Cinneide, C. (2018). The Social Security (Scotland) Act 2018—A Rights-Based Approach to Social Security? Edinburgh Law Review, 23, 123–130.Google Scholar
  29. O’Hara, G. (2008). The Intellectuals’ Ideal: British Views of Scandinavia in the 1950s and 1960s. In J. E. Myhre (Ed.), Intellectuals in the Public Sphere in Britain and Norway after World War II. Oslo: Oslo Academic Press.Google Scholar
  30. Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO). (2018). Annual Report 2017–18.Google Scholar
  31. Roosevelt, E. (1948). The Promise of Human Rights. Foreign Affairs. In A. Black (Ed.), Courage in a Dangerous World: The Political Writings of Eleanor Roosevelt (pp. 156–168). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Roosevelt, E. (1958). The Great Question. Remarks delivered at the United Nations. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  33. Roosevelt, E. (2016). The Moral Basis of Democracy. New York: Open Road.Google Scholar
  34. Shonfield, A. (1965). Modern Capitalism: The Changing Balance of Public and Private Power. London: OUP.Google Scholar
  35. Sunstein, C. (2004). The Second Bill of Rights: FDR’s Unfinished Revolution and Why We Need It More Than Ever. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  36. Thomas, R. (2011). Speech to the Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council Annual Conference, 17 November 2011. Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council.Google Scholar
  37. Thomas, R., & Tomlinson, J. (2017). Mapping Current Issues in Administrative Justice: Austerity and the ‘More Bureaucratic Rationality’ Approach. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 39(3), 380–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. UK Administrative Justice Institute (UKAJI). (2018). A Research Roadmap for Administrative Justice. Colchester: University of Essex.Google Scholar
  39. White Paper: Transforming Public Services: Complaints, Redress and Tribunals. (2004). London: Department for Constitutional Affairs.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of EssexLondonUK
  2. 2.University of LiverpoolStockportUK

Personalised recommendations