Advertisement

Tinderbook: Fall in Love with Culture

  • Enrico PalumboEmail author
  • Alberto Buzio
  • Andrea Gaiardo
  • Giuseppe Rizzo
  • Raphael Troncy
  • Elena Baralis
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11503)

Abstract

More than 2 millions of new books are published every year and choosing a good book among the huge amount of available options can be a challenging endeavor. Recommender systems help in choosing books by providing personalized suggestions based on the user reading history. However, most book recommender systems are based on collaborative filtering, involving a long onboarding process that requires to rate many books before providing good recommendations. Tinderbook provides book recommendations, given a single book that the user likes, through a card-based playful user interface that does not require an account creation. Tinderbook is strongly rooted in semantic technologies, using the DBpedia knowledge graph to enrich book descriptions and extending a hybrid state-of-the-art knowledge graph embeddings algorithm to derive an item relatedness measure for cold start recommendations. Tinderbook is publicly available (http://www.tinderbook.it) and has already generated interest in the public, involving passionate readers, students, librarians, and researchers. The online evaluation shows that Tinderbook achieves almost 50% of precision of the recommendations.

Keywords

Recommender systems Books Knowledge graphs DBpedia Embeddings 

References

  1. 1.
    Adomavicius, G., Tuzhilin, A.: Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 17(6), 734–749 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alharthi, H., Inkpen, D., Szpakowicz, S.: A survey of book recommender systems. J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 51(1), 139–160 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Babich, N.: Designing card-based user interfaces (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bizer, C., Heath, T., Berners-Lee, T.: Linked data-the story so far. In: Semantic Services, Interoperability and Web Applications: Emerging Concepts, pp. 205–227 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cai, T.: The tinder effect: swipe to kiss (keep it simple, stupid!) (2018)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cousins, C.: The complete guide to an effective card-style interface design (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    David, G., Cambre, C.: Screened intimacies: tinder and the swipe logic. Soc. Media+ Soc. 2(2) (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Di Noia, T.: Recommender systems meet linked open data. In: Bozzon, A., Cudre-Maroux, P., Pautasso, C. (eds.) ICWE 2016. LNCS, vol. 9671, pp. 620–623. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38791-8_61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Di Noia, T., Ostuni, V.C., Tomeo, P., Di Sciascio, E.: SPRank: semantic path-based ranking for top-n recommendations using linked open data. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. (TIST) 8(1), 9 (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Figueroa, C., Vagliano, I., Rocha, O.R., Morisio, M.: A systematic literature review of linked data-based recommender systems. Concurrency Comput. Pract. Experience 27(17), 4659–4684 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ge, M., Delgado-Battenfeld, C., Jannach, D.: Beyond accuracy: evaluating recommender systems by coverage and serendipity. In: 4th International Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys), pp. 257–260 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    de Gemmis, M., Lops, P., Semeraro, G., Musto, C.: An investigation on the serendipity problem in recommender systems. Inf. Process. Manage. 51(5), 695–717 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grover, A., Leskovec, J.: node2vec: scalable feature learning for networks. In: 22nd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD), pp. 855–864 (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lops, P., de Gemmis, M., Semeraro, G.: Content-based recommender systems: state of the art and trends. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B., Kantor, P.B. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 73–105. Springer, Boston (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85820-3_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Palumbo, E., Rizzo, G., Troncy, R.: Entity2rec: learning user-item relatedness from knowledge graphs for top-n item recommendation. In: 11th International Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys), pp. 32–36 (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Palumbo, E., Rizzo, G., Troncy, R., Baralis, E., Osella, M., Ferro, E.: Knowledge graph embeddings with node2vec for item recommendation. In: European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC), Demo Track, pp. 117–120 (2018)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Palumbo, E., Rizzo, G., Troncy, R., Baralis, E., Osella, M., Ferro, E.: Translational models for item recommendation. In: Gangemi, A., et al. (eds.) ESWC 2018. LNCS, vol. 11155, pp. 478–490. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98192-5_61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ristoski, P., Rosati, J., Di Noia, T., De Leone, R., Paulheim, H.: RDF2Vec: RDF graph embeddings and their applications. Semant. Web J. 10(4) (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rosati, J., Ristoski, P., Di Noia, T., de Leone, R., Paulheim, H.: RDF graph embeddings for content-based recommender systems. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1673, pp. 23–30 (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., Konstan, J., Riedl, J.: Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In: 10th International World Wide Web Conference, pp. 285–295 (2001)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shi, C., Hu, B., Zhao, X., Yu, P.: Heterogeneous information network embedding for recommendation. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 357–370 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Steck, H.: Evaluation of recommendations: rating-prediction and ranking. In: 7th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 213–220 (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vargas, S., Castells, P.: Rank and relevance in novelty and diversity metrics for recommender systems. In: 5th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 109–116 (2011)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Welch, B.L.: The generalization of student’s problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika 34(1/2), 28–35 (1947)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang, F., Yuan, N.J., Lian, D., Xie, X., Ma, W.Y.: Collaborative knowledge base embedding for recommender systems. In: 22nd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD), pp. 353–362 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LINKS FoundationTurinItaly
  2. 2.EURECOMSophia AntipolisFrance
  3. 3.Politecnico di TorinoTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations