Advertisement

Multifocal Intraocular Lenses: Postimplantation Residual Refractive Error

  • Maja BohacEmail author
  • Ante Barisic
  • Sudi Patel
  • Nikica Gabric
Chapter
Part of the Essentials in Ophthalmology book series (ESSENTIALS)

Abstract

The meteoric technological advances and rapid shifts in the modes of practice have made cataract surgery a major form of refractive surgery. Modern microsurgical techniques, creative IOL technologies, sophisticated methods for biometry, and advanced methods of intraocular lens power calculation allow most cataract patients to regain high-quality vision. With the introduction of multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOLs), many patients request and expect total spectacle independence for all visual tasks. Overall, patient satisfaction scores after implantation of MIOLs are high. Satisfaction scores are closely linked to postop uncorrected distance, near and intermediate, visual acuity. There are various reasons that can lead to residual refractive error after the either clear lens exchange or cataract surgery (e.g. incorrect biometry methods, incorrect estimation of effective lens position and axial length measurement, surgically induced astigmatism, tilting or displacement of IOL). Strategies for correcting any residual refractive error include spectacle correction and contact lenses, corneal incisional procedures or enhancements with excimer laser (LASIK, PRK), conductive keratoplasty and lens based repeat surgery (IOL exchange, piggyback lenses).

Keywords

Multifocal intraocular lenses Refractive lens exchange Presbyopia LASIK PRK 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Requirements

Funding – No funding was received for this research.

Conflict of interest: All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria, educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical approval: All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the studies.

References

  1. 1.
    Gibbons A, Ali TK, Waren DP, et al. Causes and correction of dissatisfaction after implantation of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:1965–70. . Published 2016 Oct 11.  https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S114890.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pepose JS. Maximizing satisfaction with presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses: the missing links. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146:641–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2008.07.033.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alió JL, Abdelghany AA, Fernández-Buenaga R. Enhancements after cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2015;26:50–5.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000000111.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Behndig A, Montan P, Stenevi U, et al. Aiming for emmetropia after cataract surgery: Swedish National Cataract Register study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38:1181–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.02.035.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leyland M, Zinicola E. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1789–98.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00722-X.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nijkamp MD, Dolders MG, de Brabander J, et al. Effectiveness of multifocal intraocular lenses to correct presbyopia after cataract surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(10):1832–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.05.023.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Olson RJ, Werner L, Mamalis N, et al. New intraocular lens technology. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140:709–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2005.03.061.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Greenstein S, Pineda R 2nd. The quest for spectacle independence: a comparison of multifocal intraocular lens implants and pseudophakic monovision for patients with presbyopia. Semin Ophthalmol. 2017;32(1):111–5.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2016.1228400.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stock RA, Thumé T, Paese LG, et al. Subjective evaluation of uncorrected vision in patients undergoing cataract surgery with (diffractive) multifocal lenses and monovision. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:1285–90. . Published 2017 Jul 11.  https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S134541.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blaylock JF, Si Z, Vickers C. Visual and refractive status at different focal distances after implantation of the ReSTOR multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:1464–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.04.011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Prager TC, Hardten DR, Fogal BJ. Enhancing intraocular lens outcome precision: an evaluation of axial length determinations, keratometry, and IOL formulas. Ophthalmol Clin N Am. 2006;19:435–48.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ohc.2006.07.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Raman S, Redmond R. Reasons for secondary surgical intervention after phacoemulsification with posterior chamber lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:513–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mester U, Vaterrodt T, Goes F, et al. Impact of personality characteristics on patient satisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation: results from the “happy patient study”. J Refract Surg. 2014;30:674–8.  https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20140903-05.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schallhorn SC, Teenan D, Venter JA, et al. Monovision LASIK versus presbyopia-correcting IOLs: comparison of clinical and patient-reported outcomes. J Refract Surg. 2017;33:749–58.  https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20170721-03.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    de Vries NE, Franssen L, Webers CA, et al. Intraocular straylight after implantation of the multifocal AcrySof ReSTOR SA60D3 diffractive intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:957–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.02.016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hida WT, Motta AF, Kara-José Junior N, et al. Comparison between OPD-scan results and visual outcomes of monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2009;72:526–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mesci C, Erbil H, Ozdoker L, et al. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity function after accommodative and multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2010;20:90–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Häring G, Dick HB, Krummenauer F, et al. Subjective photic phenomena with refractive multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses. Results of a multicenter questionnaire. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:245–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Braga-Mele R, Chang D, Dewey S, et al. Multifocal intraocular lenses: relative indications and contraindications for implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:313–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.12.011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cho YK, Kim MS. Dry eye after cataract surgery and associated intraoperative risk factors. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2009;23:65–73.  https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2009.23.2.65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kasetsuwan N, Satitpitakul V, Changul T, et al. Incidence and pattern of dry eye after cataract surgery. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e78657.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078657. eCollection 2013CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kamiya K, Hayashi K, Shimizu K, et al. Survey working group of the Japanese society of cataract and refractive surgery. Multifocal intraocular lens explantation: a case series of 50 eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158:215–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2014.04.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    de Vries NE, Webers CA, Touwslager WR, et al. Dissatisfaction after implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:859–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.11.032.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Woodward MA, Randleman JB, Stulting RD. Dissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:992–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.01.031.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Barsam A, Voldman A, Donnenfeld E. Advanced technology IOLs in cataract surgery: management of the unhappy patient. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2012;52:95–102.  https://doi.org/10.1097/IIO.0b013e31824b439c.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    McNeely RN, Pazo E, Millar Z, et al. Threshold limit of postoperative astigmatism for patient satisfaction after refractive lens exchange and multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:1126–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.05.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zheleznyak L, Kim MJ, MacRae S, et al. Impact of corneal aberrations on through-focus image quality of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses using an adaptive optics bench system. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38:1724–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.05.032.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F, et al. Influence of astigmatism on multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130:477–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Alió JL, Abdelghany AA, Fernández-Buenaga R. Management of residual refractive error after cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2014;25:291–7.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000000067.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Norrby S. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:368–76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.10.031.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Khor WB, Afshari NA. The role of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses after laser in situ keratomileusis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2013;24:35–40.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0b013e32835ab457.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kawahara A, Kurosaka D, Yoshida A. Comparison of surgically induced astigmatism between one-handed and two-handed cataract surgery techniques. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:1967–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    McIntyre JS, Werner L, Fuller SR, et al. Assessment of a single-piece hydrophilic acrylic IOL for piggyback sulcus fixation in pseudophakic cadaver eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38:155–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.06.035.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ferrer-Blasco T, Montés-Micó R, Peixoto-de-Matos SC, et al. Prevalence of corneal astigmatism before cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:70–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.09.027.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lee H, Kim TI, Kim EK. Corneal astigmatism analysis for toric intraocular lens implantation: precise measurements for perfect correction. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2015;26:34–8.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000000119.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chen X, Zhao M, Shi Y, et al. Visual outcomes and optical quality after implantation of a diffractive multifocal toric intraocular lens. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2016;64:285–91.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.182939.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jennings JAM, Charman WN. A comparison of errors in some methods of subjective refraction. Ophthalmic Optician. 1973;13:11–8.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rosenfield M, Chiu NN. Repeatability of subjective and objective refraction. Optom Vis Sci. 1995;72(8):577–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Leinonen LE, Laatikainen L. Repeatability (test-retest variability) of refractive error measurement in clinical settings. Acta Ophthalmol. 2006;84:532–6.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00695.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bowman KJ, Smith G, Carney LG. Corneal topography and monocular diplopia following near work. Am J Optom Physiol Optic. 1978;55:818–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ford JG, Davis RM, Reed JW, et al. Bilateral monocular diplopia associated with lid position during near work. Cornea. 1997;16:525–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Golnik KC, Eggenberger E. Symptomatic corneal topographic change induced by reading in downgaze. J Neuroophthalmol. 2001;21:199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wilson G, Bell C, Chotai S. The effects of lifting the lids on corneal astigmatism. Am J Optom Physiol Optic. 1982;59:670–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Grey C, Yap M. Influence of lid position on astigmatism. Am J Optom Physiol Optic. 1986;63:966–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Atchison DA, Smith G. Optics of the human eye. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2000. p. 213–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Read SA, Collins MJ, Carney LG. The diurnal variation of corneal topography and aberrations. Cornea. 2005;24:678–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Patel S, Tutchenko L, Voytsekhivskyy O. An evaluation of unexpected refractive outcomes following toric IOL implantation for astigmatism: a sector subtraction graphical method for calculating the effective astigmatic correction. Ukraine J Ophthalmol. 2016;2:55–62.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Venter J, Blumenfeld R, Schallhorn S, et al. Nonpenetrating femtosecond laser intrastromal astigmatic keratotomy in patients with mixed astigmatism after previous refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2013;29:180–6.  https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20130129-09.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Fernández-Buenaga R, Alió JL, Pérez Ardoy AL, et al. Resolving refractive error after cataract surgery: IOL exchange, piggyback lens, or LASIK. J Refract Surg. 2013;29:676–83.  https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20130826-01.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Piñero DR, Ayala Espinosa MJ, Alió JL. LASIK outcomes following multifocal and monofocal intraocular lens implantation. J Refract Surg. 2010;26:569–77.  https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20091030-02.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Alfonso JF, Fernández-Vega L, Montés-Micó R, et al. Femtosecond laser for residual refractive error correction after refractive lens exchange with multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146:244–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2008.03.022.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Jendritza BB, Knorz MC, Morton S. Wavefront-guided excimer laser vision correction after multifocal IOL implantation. J Refract Surg. 2008;24:274–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kuo IC, O’Brien TP, Broman AT, et al. Excimer laser surgery for correction of ametropia after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:2104–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.08.023.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kim P, Briganti EM, Sutton GL, et al. Laser in situ keratomileusis for refractive error after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:979–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.08.054.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Leccisotti A. Secondary procedures after presbyopic lens exchange. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:1461–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.11.056.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Norouzi H, Rahmati-Kamel M. Laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of induced astigmatism from cataract surgery. J Refract Surg. 2003;19:416–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Pop M, Payette Y, Amyot M. Clear lens extraction with intraocular lens followed by photorefractive keratectomy or laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:104–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Macsai MS, Fontes BM. Refractive enhancement following presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens implantation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008;19:18–21.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0b013e3282f14d9f.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Jin GJ, Merkley KH, Crandall AS, et al. Laser in situ keratomileusis versus lens-based surgery for correcting residual refractive error after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:562–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.11.040.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Nichamin LD. Expanding the role of bioptics to the pseudophakic patient. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:1343–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Muñoz G, Albarrán-Diego C, Sakla HF. Validity of autorefraction after cataract surgery with multifocal ReZoom intraocular lens implantation. Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:1573–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.05.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Bissen-Miyajima H, Minami K, Yoshino M, et al. Autorefraction after implantation of diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:553–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.10.047.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Mohammadi SF, Rahman-A N, Mazouri A. Subjective refraction in eyes with multifocal IOLs. J Refract Surg. 2011;27:161.  https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20110114-01.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Charman WN, Montés-Micó R, Radhakrishnan H. Problems in the measurement of wavefront aberration for eyes implanted with diffractive bifocal and multifocal intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg. 2008;24:280–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Campbell CE. Wavefront measurements of diffractive and refractive multifocal intraocular lenses in an artificial eye. J Refract Surg. 2008;24:308–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    El Awady HE, Ghanem AA. Secondary piggyback implantation versus IOL exchange for symptomatic pseudophakic residual ametropia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251:1861–6.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-013-2283-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Fernández-Buenaga R, Alió JL, Muñoz-Negrete FJ, et al. Causes of IOL explantation in Spain. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2012;22:762–8.  https://doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5000168.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Jones JJ, Jones YJ, Jin GJ. Indications and outcomes of intraocular lens exchange during a recent 5-year period. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157:154–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2013.08.019.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Huerva V. Piggyback multifocal IOLs for a hyperopic-presbyopic surprise after cataract surgery in high myopic patients. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2014;37:57–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2013.07.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Hengerer FH. Current state of the ‘light-adjustable lens’. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2012;229:784–93.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1315207.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maja Bohac
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ante Barisic
    • 2
  • Sudi Patel
    • 3
  • Nikica Gabric
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Cornea and Refractive SurgerySpecialty Eye Hospital Svjetlost, School of Medicine University of RijekaZagrebCroatia
  2. 2.Cataract DepartmentSpecialty Eye Hospital Svjetlost, School of Medicine University of RijekaZagrebCroatia
  3. 3.Specialty Eye Hospital Svjetlost, School of Medicine University of RijekaZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations