Advertisement

Multifocal Intraocular Lenses: AcrySof ReSTOR® SN6AD2 + 2.5 D Lens

  • Rodolfo Mastropasqua
  • Francesco Aiello
  • Emilio Pedrotti
  • Giorgio Marchini
Chapter
Part of the Essentials in Ophthalmology book series (ESSENTIALS)

Abstract

The AcrySof ReSTOR® +2.5 D is a multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) available since 2012. The IOL structure has a monofocal central area that ensures a high passage of light for distance vision and an apodized diffractive region with seven concentric rings. In this chapter, we review the current literature and our clinical experience in terms of visual acuity at different distances, quality of vision, and patient satisfaction. These results are also compared with those of other multifocal IOLs, comprising the previous model AcrySof ReSTOR® +3 D. The current increasing demand by cataract patients to be spectacle-free following surgery has increased the need for different types of multifocal IOLs. The AcrySof ReSTOR® +2.5 D is ideal for patients who require a good range of vision at intermediate distances without sacrificing the quality and quantity of distance vision.

Keywords

AcrySof ReSTOR +2.5 D ReSTOR SN6AD2 Multifocal IOL Spectacle independence +2.5 D add power IOL 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Requirements

Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. No human or animal studies were carried out by the authors for this chapter.

References

  1. 1.
    Kohnen T, Nuijts R, Levy P, Haefliger E, Alfonso JF. Visual function after bilateral implantation of apodized diffractive aspheric multifocal intraocular lenses with a +3.0 D addition. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(12):2062–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alfonso JF, Fernandez-Vega L, Puchades C, Montes-Mico R. Intermediate visual function with different multifocal intraocular lens models. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(5):733–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vega F, Alba-Bueno F, Millan MS, Varon C, Gil MA, Buil JA. Halo and through-focus performance of four diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(6):3967–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carson D, Hill WE, Hong X, Karakelle M. Optical bench performance of AcrySof((R)) IQ ReSTOR((R)), AT LISA((R)) tri, and FineVision((R)) intraocular lenses. Clin Ophthalmol (Auckland, NZ). 2014;8:2105–13.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hayashi K, Ogawa S, Manabe S, Hirata A. Visual outcomes in eyes with a distance-dominant diffractive multifocal intraocular lens with low near addition power. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99(11):1466–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nuijts RM, Jonker SM, Kaufer RA, Lapid-Gortzak R, Mendicute J, Martinez CP, et al. Bilateral implantation of +2.5 D multifocal intraocular lens and contralateral implantation of +2.5 D and +3.0 D multifocal intraocular lenses: clinical outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(2):194–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pedrotti E, Mastropasqua R, Passilongo M, Parisi G, Marchesoni I, Marchini G. Comparison of two multifocal intraocular lens designs that differ only in near add. J Refract Surg (Thorofare, NJ: 1995). 2014;30(11):754–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mastropasqua R, Pedrotti E, Passilongo M, Parisi G, Marchesoni I, Marchini G. Long-term visual function and patient satisfaction after bilateral implantation and combination of two similar multifocal IOLs. J Refract Surg (Thorofare, NJ: 1995). 2015;31(5):308–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pedrotti E, Carones F, Aiello F, Mastropasqua R, Bruni E, Bonacci E, et al. Comparative analysis of visual outcomes with 4 intraocular lenses: Monofocal, multifocal, and extended range of vision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44(2):156–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nagy ZZ, Kranitz K, Takacs AI, Mihaltz K, Kovacs I. Knorz MC. Comparison of intraocular lens decentration parameters after femtosecond and manual capsulotomies. J Refract Surg (Thorofare, NJ: 1995). 2011;27(8):564–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gundersen KG, Potvin R. Comparative visual performance with monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses. Clin Ophthalmol (Auckland, NZ). 2013;7:1979–85.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rodolfo Mastropasqua
    • 1
    • 2
  • Francesco Aiello
    • 3
  • Emilio Pedrotti
    • 1
  • Giorgio Marchini
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeurosciencesBiomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of VeronaVeronaItaly
  2. 2.Department of NeurosciencePolytechnic University of MarcheAnconaItaly
  3. 3.University of Rome “Tor Vergata,” Experimental MedicineRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations