Water Allocation Plan to Meet Multi-regional Relevance Needs

  • Lu Zhao
  • Xudong Chen
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1001)


With the rapid development of the economy and society, water resources are becoming scarcer and may lead to conflicts. Regional demand linkages have an impact on water allocation. This paper proposes a dynamic programming model, introducing power coefficients to verify the stability of the decision-making scheme, and considering the relevance of regional demand in the process of water resources allocation. Through numerical analysis, it is proved that the model provides a practical water allocation plan for the river basin management department.


Demand correlation Supply rate Stability Dynamic programming Environment and sustainable development 



We thank department editors, associate editors, and judges for their valuable comments on earlier versions of this article. They made many profound and constructive comments. We are grateful to Professor Zhong for his research on areas of relevance in the supply rate issue, which provide a lot of inspiration for our article. We also thank Professor Hu for his research on water resources management issues, and he has provided us with many valuable opinions. Without the guidance of these seniors, this article will not be as perfect as it is now.


  1. 1.
    Alaya, A.B., Souissi, A., Tarhouni, J., Ncib, K.: Optimization of Nebhana reservoir water allocation by stochastic dynamic programming. Water Resour. Manag. 17(4), 259–272 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ansink, E., Ruijs, A.: Climate change and the stability of water allocation agreements. Environ. Resour. Econ. 41(2), 249–266 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arnell, N.W.: Climate change and global water resources: SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios. Glob. Environ. Change 14(1), 31–52 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bjornlund, H., Rossini, P.: Fundamentals determining prices in the market for water entitlements: an Australian case study. Water Resour. Dev. 23(3), 537–553 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cai, X., McKinney, D.C., Lasdon, L.S.: Solving nonlinear water management models using a combined genetic algorithm and linear programming approach. Adv. Water Resour. 24(6), 667–676 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chaturvedi, A.: Indus water treaty: options for India (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chaturvedi, S.: Indus water treaty: review is not an option (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Colby, B.G., Crandall, K., Bush, D.B.: Water right transactions: market values and price dispersion. Water Resour. Res. 29(6), 1565–1572 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Divakar, L., Babel, M.S., Perret, S., Gupta, A.D.: Optimal allocation of bulk water supplies to competing use sectors based on economic criterion—an application to the Chao Phraya River Basin, Thailand. J. Hydrol. 401(1–2), 22–35 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eliasson, J.: The rising pressure of global water shortages. Nat. News 517(7532), 6 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gleick, P.H.: Water and conflict: fresh water resources and international security. Int. Secur. 18(1), 79–112 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gleick, P.H., Heberger, M.: Water and conflict. In: The Worlds Water, pp 159–171. Springer (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gunasekara, N., Kazama, S., Yamazaki, D., Oki, T.: Water conflict risk due to water resource availability and unequal distribution. Water Resour. Manag. 28(1), 169–184 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hu, Z., Wei, C., Yao, L., Li, C., Zeng, Z.: Integrating equality and stability to resolve water allocation issues with a multiobjective bilevel programming model. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 142(7), 04016,013 (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Karimi, A., Ardakanian, R.: Development of a dynamic long-term water allocation model for agriculture and industry water demands. Water Resour. Manag. 24(9), 1717–1746 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kronaveter, L., Shamir, U.: Negotiation support for cooperative allocation of a shared water resource: methodology. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 135(2), 60–69 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li, S., Wang, F., Ma, T., Yan, W.: Genetic algorithm based fuzzy multi-objective nonlinear programming of regional water allocation. In: 2008 IEEE Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems, pp. 1353–1358. IEEE (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lu, H., Huang, G., He, L.: An inexact rough-interval fuzzy linear programming method for generating conjunctive water-allocation strategies to agricultural irrigation systems. Appl. Math. Model. 35(9), 4330–4340 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Read, L., Madani, K., Inanloo, B.: Optimality versus stability in water resource allocation. J. Environ. Manag. 133, 343–354 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Richter, B.D.: Re-thinking environmental flows: from allocations and reserves to sustainability boundaries. River Res. Appl. 26(8), 1052–1063 (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sakamoto, M., Tanaka, Y., Salewicz, K.A., Nakayama, M.: Game theoretical analysis of water allocation rule in lower basin of Euphrates and Tigris rivers. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp. 2042–2049. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Song, J., Whittington, D.: Why have some countries on international rivers been successful negotiating treaties? A global perspective. Water Resour. Res. 40(5) (2004)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Syme, G.J., Nancarrow, B.E., McCreddin, J.A.: Defining the components of fairness in the allocation of water to environmental and human uses. J. Environ. Manag. 57(1), 51–70 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Teasley, R.L., McKinney, D.C.: Calculating the benefits of transboundary river basin cooperation: Syr Darya Basin. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 137(6), 481–490 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhong, Y., Zheng, Z., Chou, M.C., Teo, C.P.: Resource pooling and allocation policies to deliver differentiated service. Manag. Sci. 64(4), 1555–1573 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Takama, N., Kuriyama, T., Shiroko, K., Umeda, T.: On the formulation of optimal water allocation problem by linear programming. Comput. Chem. Eng. 5(2), 119–121 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lu Zhao
    • 1
  • Xudong Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.School of BusinessSichuan UniversityChengduPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations