An Approach for Processing the Real-time Monitoring Data of Water Quality and Its Application in Water Quality Evaluating

  • Shiliang Gao
  • Linsong Zhang
  • Jingneng NiEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1001)


The processing of monitored data is the key to water quality assessment and plays an important role in the development and application of water quality assessment models. Base on fuzzy random variable, an approach for processing the monitored data of water quality is proposed in this paper. In which, all monitored data information of water quality are included into a fuzzy random variable via an interval and a probability density function. Embedded into a one-factor assessment model, the proposed approach is applied to assess water quality in Chaohu lake, located in eastern China, to verify its feasibility. The results show that the approach proposed in the research has the advantage of reducing the loss of water quality information.


Monitored data Fuzzy random variable Fuzzy interval Probability density function Water quality assessment 



The research is supported by the Quality Engineering Foundation of Hefei University (Grant No. 2017jyxm016), also supported by the Social Science Foundation of Anhui Province (Grant No. AHSKY2017D83),the Talent Foundation of Hefei University (Grant No. 16-17RC27),the Major Program for Humanities and Social Sciences of Education Bureau of Anhui Province (Grant No. SK2018ZD048). The authors thank the reviewers’ valuable comments and editors’ constructive suggestions, which will greatly improve the quality of this paper.


  1. 1.
    Horton, R.K.: An index number system for rating water quality. J. Water Pollut. Control. Fed. 37, 300–306 (1965)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akomeah, E., Chun, K., Lindenschmidt, K.E.: Dynamic water quality modelling and uncertainty analysis of phytoplankton and nutrient cycles for the upper South Saskatchewan River. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 22(22), 18239–18251 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mohseni-Bandpei, A., Motesaddi, S., Eslamizadeh, M., et al.: Water quality assessment of the most important dam (Latyan dam) in Tehran, Iran. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 25(29), 29227–29239 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li, K., He, C., Zhuang, J., et al.: A long-term changes in the water quality and macroinvertebrate communities of a subtropical river in South China. Water 7, 63–80 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ni, J., Xu, J., Zhang, M.: Incorporating pollutants interaction with the environment and parameter uncertainty in water quality evaluation:a case of Lake Chauhan, China. Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply 18(2), 723–736 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Canfield, D.E., Hoyer, M.V., Bachmann, R.W., et al.: Water quality changes at an outstanding Florida water: influence of stochastic events and climate variability. Lake Reserv. Manag. 32(3), 297–313 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yan, F., Qian, B., Liu, C.: Introducing biological indicators into CCME WQI using variable fuzzy set method. Water Resour. Manag. 32(8), 2901–2915 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kwakernaak, H.: Fuzzy random variables, part I: definitions and theorems. Inf. Sci. 15, 1–29 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Puri, M.L., Ralescu, D.A.: Fuzzy random variables. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 114, 409–422 (1986)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kruse, R., Meyer, K.D.: Statistics with Vague Data. Reidel Publishing, Dordrecht (1987)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gil, M.A., Lopez-Diaz, M., Ralescu, D.A.: Overview on the development of fuzzy random variables. Fuzzy Set Syst. 157, 2546–2557 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chang, H., Yao, J., Ouyang, L.: Fuzzy mixture inventory model involving fuzzy random variable lead time demand and fuzzy total demand. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 169(1), 65–80 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Efendia, R., Arbaiy, N., Deris, M.M.: A new procedure in stock market forecasting based on fuzzy random auto-regression time series model. Inf. Sci. 441, 113–132 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li, J., Xu, J., Gen, M.: A class of multiobjective linear programming model with fuzzy random coefficients. Math Comput. Model. 44, 1097–1113 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shrestha, S., Kazama, F.: Assessment of surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques: a case study of the Fuji river basin, Japan. Environ. Model. Softw. 22, 464–475 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu, L., Zhou, J., An, X., et al.: Using fuzzy theory and information entropy for water quality assessment in Three Gorges region, China. Expert Syst. Appl. 37, 2517–2521 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang, W., Xu, D., Chau, K., et al.: Assessment of river water quality based on theory of variable fuzzy sets and fuzzy binary comparison method. Water Resour. Manag. 28, 4183–4200 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and PhysicsHefei UniversityHefeiPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Mathematical Modeling LaboratoryHefei UniversityHefeiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations