Advertisement

Basic Techniques for Endonasal Rhinoplasty

  • İsmail Güler
  • Işıl Adadan Güvenç
  • Gordon Soo
Chapter

Abstract

Rhinoplasty is a procedure, which modifies the esthetic and functional elements of the nose. Surgical approaches include endonasal and external incisions usually on the columella. Initially, the endonasal rhinoplasty approach was described as “closed” rhinoplasty, as this term implies that the surgeon is not able to clearly see or reach necessary regions of the nose in the course of surgery. However, the term “endonasal” seems to represent with a more proper way this type of approach. Currently, some authors still refer endonasal techniques as closed rhinoplasty; while external techniques are referred to as open rhinoplasty. The advantages of the endonasal rhinoplasty are listed as: limited dissection to regions requiring changes, allows formation of a small-sized pocket so that graft material will fit precisely without fixation, permits percutaneous fixation whenever large pockets are produced, promotes recovery preserving vascular bridges, promotes exact preoperative analysis and planning, minimal postoperative swelling, forms intact tip graft pocket, permits composite grafting to alar rims, preserves nasal tip support mechanisms, equivalent reduction in the possibility of general scarring or iatrogenic damage to the nose, ability to produce accurate alterations in situ, a more prompt and foreseeable ability to feel adjustments created onto the nose with tactile palpation, capability to produce specific changes in one piece, needs less surgical time compared with open techniques, no external columellar scar, and faster postoperative appearance of the final result.

Keywords

Basic techniques Endonasal rhinoplasty Advantages Limited dissection Percutaneous fixation Minimal postoperative swelling 

References

  1. 1.
    D’Ascanio L. “Closed” rhinoplasty: an out-of-date procedure. Ann Otolaryngol Rhinol. 2014;1(2):1008.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vartanian JA. Basic closed rhinoplasty treatment & management. Granick MS (Chief Editor). http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1291976-overview. Accessed 3 June 2015.
  3. 3.
    Janis JE, Rohrich RJ. Rhinoplasty. In: Thorne CH, editor. Grabb and Smith’s plastic surgery, Chapter 51. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, A Wolters Kluwer Business; 2007. p. 517–32.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daniel RK. A basic rhinoplasty operation. In: Mastering rhinoplasty, A comprehensive atlas of surgical techniques with integrated video clips. Chapter 2. http://www.springer.com/978-3-642-01401-7. Accessed 3 June 2015.
  5. 5.
    D’Ascanio L, Manzini M. Quick septoplasty: surgical technique and learning curve. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2009;33:814–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cochran CS, Ducic Y, Defatta RJ. Rethinking nasal osteotomies: an anatomic approach. Laryngoscope. 2007;117(4):662–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ducic Y. Closed rhinoplasty. Operative Techn Otolaryngol. 2007;18:233–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Whitaker E. Nasal hump rhinoplasty. Medscape. Meyers AD (Ed.). http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/841439-overview. Accessed 3 June 2015.
  9. 9.
    Sheen JH. Spreader graft: a method of reconstructing the roof of the middle nasal vault following rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984;73:230–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rohrich RJ, Hollier LH. Use of spreader grafts in the external approach to rhinoplasty. Clin Plast Surg. 1996;23(2):255–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tardy ME Jr, Becker D, Weinberger M. Illusions in rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg. 1995;11(3):117–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Scattolin A, D’Ascanio L. Grafts in “closed” rhinoplasty. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2013;33:169–76.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bottini DJ, Gentile P, Donfrancesco A, et al. Augmentation rhinoplasty with autologous grafts. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2008;32:136–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Peck GC. The onlay graft for nasal tip projection. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;71:27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kridel RW, Scott BA, Foda HM. The tongue-in-groove technique in septorhinoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 1989;1:246–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shah AR, Miller PJ. Structural approach to endonasal rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg. 2006;22(1):55–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Surowitz JB, Most SP. Complications of rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2013;21(4):639–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rettinger G. Risks and complications in rhinoplasty. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;6:Doc08.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • İsmail Güler
    • 1
  • Işıl Adadan Güvenç
    • 2
  • Gordon Soo
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of OtorhinolaryngologyAnkara Numune Training and Research Hospital, University of Health SciencesAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Department of OtorhinolaryngologyÇiğli Regional Training HospitalİzmirTurkey
  3. 3.The ENTific® CentreCentralHong Kong

Personalised recommendations