Inner Lining Reconstruction of the Nose

  • Mustafa Daloglu
  • Görkem Eskiizmir
  • Dmitry Zabolotny


The nose is lined with a thin, vascular mucosal epithelium, which is strongly adherent to the underlying osseous and cartilaginous tissues of the nose. The strength of this attachment to the underlying structures imposes limits on how much the mucosa can move, thus rendering 5 mm the maximum diameter of deficits which can close by primary intention. Burget outlined beautifully the principles supporting the practice of nasal reconstruction in his 1985 work. This work extends the framework of plastic surgery essentials on which surgical outcomes of the highest order depend.

The principles underlying replacement are that deficits need to be substituted with tissue of a similar kind and similar amount. For example, relining of the nose needs to involve lining mucosa, cartilaginous tissue can replace cartilage, osseous tissue can replace bone, and donor site skin needs to resemble the missing skin in coloration and texture. The author has a preference for skin flaps rather than skin grafts precisely because of their better fit in terms of coloration and texture, their ability to resist contracting, and their ability to ensure a vascularized lining for the nasal skeletal elements. Nasal skin should ideally be replaced with other skin from the nose, provided a suitable donor site exists. Skin flaps ought to be the first choice since their advantages in terms of color and texture matching are greater than the drawback of extra scar formation. Template use is to be advised. When recreating lost sections, the nose as normally found offers a three-dimensional template to follow. Materials which are of a sufficient balance between rigidity and flexibility are essential for forming a template: suture packaging materials fits the bill well.


Inner lining reconstruction Nose Maximum diameter Deficit Template 


  1. 1.
    Fata J. Principles and techniques of nasal reconstruction. In: Narayan D (Ed.). Medscape. (Accessed online at May 23, 2016)
  2. 2.
    Burget GC. Aesthetic restoration of the nose. Clin Plast Surg. 1985;12(3):463–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Millard DR Jr. Hemirhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1967;40(5):440–5. [Medline]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burget GC, Menick FJ. Nasal support and lining: the marriage of beauty and blood supply. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;84(2):189–202. [Medline]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Menick F. Nasal reconstruction: art and practice. New York: Elsevier; 2008.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burget G, Menick F. Aesthetic reconstruction of the nose. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1993.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Menick F. Defects of the nose, lip and cheek: rebuilding the composite defect. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:1228–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Menick FJ. Facial reconstruction with local and distant tissue: The interface of the aesthetic and reconstructive surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;102:1424–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Walton RL, Burget GC, Beahm EK. Microsurgical reconstruction of nasal lining. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:1813–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Burget GC, Walton RL. Optimal use of microvascular free flaps, cartilage grafts, and a paramedian forehead flap for aesthetic reconstruction of the nose and adjacent facial units. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:1171–207; discussion 1208–1216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Menick FJ. Nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(4):138e–50e. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mustafa Daloglu
    • 1
  • Görkem Eskiizmir
    • 2
  • Dmitry Zabolotny
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Medical EducationAkdeniz UniversityAntalyaTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck SurgeryManisa Celal Bayar UniversityManisaTurkey
  3. 3.Department of OtolaryngologyAcademician of National Academy of Medical SciencesKievUkraine

Personalised recommendations