Exploratory Hypotheses: Chile, Peru, and Argentina
The intent throughout this chapter is to derive a number of generalizations in the form of hypotheses by comparing the state-creation and democratization processes of Argentina, Chile, and Peru. A total of ten hypotheses are presented throughout the analysis to explain the conditions that facilitated or obstructed the processes of state creation and democratization in the three countries.
- Degregori, Carlos Iván, and Carlos Rivera Paz. 1994. Perú 1980–1993: Fuerzas Armadas, Subversión y Democracia: Redefinición Del Papel Militar En Un Contexto De Violencia Subversiva y Colapso Del Régimen Democrático. Instituto De Estudios Peruanos. Print.Google Scholar
- Democracy Index 2018: Democracy in an Age of Anxiety. The Economist—The Intelligence Unit, 2018. Web. 24 Jan. 2019.Google Scholar
- Latinobarómetro: Opinión Pública Latinoamericana, Informe 1995–2015. Latinobarometro.org, n.d. Web. 03 May 2017.
- Mainwaring, Scott, and Aníbal Pérez-Liñan. 2005. Latin American Democratization Since 1978: Democratic Transitions, Breakdowns, and Erosion. In The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America: Advances and Setbacks, ed. Frances Hagopian and Scott Mainwaring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Peru Declares State of Emergency After Bombing by Leftist Guerrillas. The New York Times, May 31, 1983. Web. 24 Jan. 2019.Google Scholar
- Peru Society and Conflict: Discrimination and Inequality. Discrimination and Inequality. Peru Support Group, 2013. Web. 24 Jan 2019.Google Scholar
- Reano, Mariella. 2002. The Origin of Peruvian Professional Militarism. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University. Print.Google Scholar
- Seligson, Mitchell, and Julio F. Carrión. 2002. Political Support, Political Skepticism, and Political Stability in New Democracies. Comparative Political Studies 35 (1): 58–82. Web. 24 Jan. 2019.Google Scholar