Two Myths About the Future of the Economy

  • Nick SrnicekEmail author


There are two common myths regarding platform economies. First, the idea that Uber’s business model will serve as a model for the rest of the economy is too simplistic. In that sense, both the promise and the threat of ‘platform capitalism’ to jobs can be overstated. Secondly, while AI does pose a threat to the economy, this is not because of automation but because it further encourages the tendency towards monopoly that already exists in the platform economy. Scholarly and media analysis of platform economies have overlooked their most important impact: the concentration of power in a handful of global companies.


  1. Farr, C. (2015, October 26). Why Homejoy Failed. Medium. Retrieved from
  2. Goodwin, T. (2015, March 3). The Battle is for the Customer Interface. TechCrunch (blog). Retrieved from
  3. Jourdan, A., & Ruwitch, J. (2016, February 18). Uber Losing $1 Billion a Year to Compete in China. Reuters. Retrieved from
  4. Jovanovic, B., & Rousseau, P. L. (2005). General Purpose Technologies. Working Paper (National Bureau of Economic Research, January 2005). Retrieved from
  5. Kosoff, M. (2017, November 9). Why the ‘Sharing Economy’ Keeps Getting Sued. Vanity Fair. Retrieved from
  6. Levine, D., & Somerville, H. (2016, May 10). Uber Drivers, If Employees, Owed $730 Million More: US Court Papers. Reuters. Retrieved from
  7. Somerville, H. (2018, January 19). Softbank is Now Uber’s Largest Shareholder as Deal Closes. Reuters. Retrieved from
  8. Srnicek, N. (2016). Platform Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. Wetzel, K. (2018, March 6). As Amazon and Google Keep Bickering, Consumers are the Ones Who Lose. Digital Trends. Retrieved from

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Digital HumanitiesKing’s College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations