Productivity and Promiscuity: Paying Undivided Attention
This chapter interrogates technologies of undivided attention within a networked culture that constantly invites consumers to divide their attention. Examples of distraction-limiting software are discursively analysed to point out some of the contradictions of the attention economy, notably that the entrepreneurial impulse of capitalist-driven networks and producers pushes consumers constantly to pay attention to multiple sites and services at the same time as the development of attention-holding products like productivity apps suggests the failure of the former model. The anomaly of undivided attention is situated within the context of network promiscuity, which is characterised by the proliferation and measurement of multiple intimacies among digital media users and between users and their media that are put to work for the economic benefit of media corporations and advertisers. The chapter ultimately questions the norms that determine the value of attention, including network culture’s implicit judgements of who and what are the deserving objects of consumer distraction.
KeywordsProductivity apps Digital promiscuity Network culture
- Anti-Social. n.d. Anti-Social: Target Your Digital Distractions. https://antisocial.80pct.com. Accessed 4 June 2015.
- Coté, Mark, and Jennifer Pybus. 2011. Learning to Immaterial Labour 2.0: Face-book and Social Networks. In Cognitive Capitalism, Education and Digital Labor, ed. Michael A. Peters and Ergin Bulut, 169–194. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- Crogan, Patrick, and Samuel Kinsley. 2012. Paying Attention: Towards a Critique of the Attention Economy. Culture Machine 13. http://culturemachine.net/index.php/cm/article/view/463/500
- Farrington, Jonathan. 2012. Have Our Customers and Clients Become Irreversibly Promiscuous? Social Media Today. https://www.socialmediatoday.com/content/have-our-customers-and-clients-become-irreversibly-promiscuous. Accessed 7 Nov 2018.
- Freedom. n.d. Freedom: Stop Being Distracted by Your Phone. https://freedom.to. Accessed 7 Nov 2018.
- George, Alison. 2012. Would You Pay to Block Your Own Internet Connection? Interview with Fred Stutzman. New Scientist, March 28. http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21328586.000-would-you-pay-to-block-your-own-internet-connection.html?full=true&print=true#.VXFxmEIxHq0. Accessed 7 Nov 2018.
- Gregg, Melissa. 2011. Work’s Intimacy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- KardBlock. n.d. http://www.kardblock.com. Accessed 4 June 2015.
- Lazzarato, Maurizio. 1996. Immaterial Labour. In Radical Thought in Italy, ed. Paolo Virno and Michael Hardt, 132–146. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Orenstein, Peggy. 2009. Stop Your Search Engines. New York Times Magazine, October 23. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/25/magazine/25FOB-WWLN-t.html?_r=0
- Parikka, Jussi. 2005. Digital Monsters, Binary Aliens: Computer Viruses, Capitalism and the Flow of Information. Fibreculture 4. http://four.fibreculturejournal.org/fcj-019-digital-monsters-binary-aliens-%E2%80%93-computer-viruses-capitalism-and-the-flow-of-information/. Accessed 2 May 2014.
- ———. 2007. Digital Contagions: A Media Archaeology of Computer Vi-ruses. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- Payne, Robert. 2015. The Promiscuity of Network Culture: Queer Theory and Digital Media. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Terranova, Tiziana. 2004. Network Culture: Politics for the Information Age. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
- Zaragoza, Jason. 2014. The Media Oxpecker: The Promiscuous Reader Problem. Association of Alternative Newsmedia, July 13. http://www.altweeklies.com/aan/the-media-oxpecker-the-promiscuous-reader-problem/Article?oid=6423191. Accessed 7 Nov 2018.