• Waddick DoyleEmail author
  • Claudia Roda


Across the social order, complaints are growing about a scarcity of attention. In the current context, attention is perceived as bearing a similarity to money: most of us do not have enough of it, we seek more of it, but it is unequally distributed across the board. We are yet to understand the full consequences of digitization and how it will change politics, ethics, and economics, just as print may have done in the early modern period. This book, however, can help us by sketching two fundamental themes of this revolution. First, a reshaping of human agency and its place in the environment. Second, a strong push toward attention commodification and the essential role played by brands.


Attentional agency Attentional environment Brands Commodification of attention Attention inequalities 


  1. Anderson, Benedict R.O’.G. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Auerbach, E. Selected Essays. James I. Porter (ed. and introd.), and O. Jane (trans.) Newman. 2013. Time, History, and Literature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Castells, Manuel. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society. Information Age. Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 2013. Communication Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Eisenstein, Elizabeth L. 1993. The Printing Revolution in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. McLuhan, Marshall. 2001. Understanding Media. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Van Dijk, Jan. 2012. The Network Society. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The American University of ParisParisFrance

Personalised recommendations