Advertisement

Fieldwork Emotions: Embedded Across Cultures, Shared, Repressed, or Subconscious

  • Judith OkelyEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Theory and History in the Human and Social Sciences book series (THHSS)

Abstract

Anthropological participant observation should confront binary oppositions and extreme dichotomies. Western intellectual traditions have illuminated dichotomies in definitions, especially Descartes’ Mind/Body division. The disembodied “I think therefore I am” prioritizes the intellect over other aspects of human experience such as the senses. Nevertheless, another French intellectual, Marcel Mauss, centuries later, published an outstanding essay on Les Techniques du Corps (1936). He explored the multiple ways in which bodily movement differs according to culture. Internal cultural differences are also affected by age and gender, which he did not confront at that pioneering stage. Notwithstanding, Mauss is relevant to the practice of anthropological fieldwork across cultures. The anthropologist learns not only with her/his mind, but crucially, in combination with the body.

Keywords

Autobiography Ethnography Emotion Feminism Travellers 

References

  1. Acton, T. (1974). Gypsy politics and social change. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  2. Barth, F. (Ed.). (1969). Introduction to: Ethnic groups and boundaries. London, Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  3. Budilová, L., & Jakoubek, M. (2009). Anthropological fieldwork, site and Roma communities. Roma/Gypsies in the Czech and Slovak Republic. Anthropological Notebooks, 15(3), 5–14.Google Scholar
  4. Clark, C., & Greenfields, M. (2006). Here to stay. Hertford: Hertfordshire Press.Google Scholar
  5. Marcus, G. E., & Clifford, J. (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. Davies, J. (2010). Introduction. Emotions in the field. In J. Davies & D. Spencer (Eds.), Emotions in the field: The psychology and anthropology of fieldwork experience (pp. 1–31). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. De Beauvoir, S. (1949). Le deuxieme sexe. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  8. De Beauvoir, S. (1958). Memoires d’une jeune fille rangée. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  9. Firestone, S., & Koedt, A. (Eds.). (1970). Notes from the second year. Women’s liberation. New York: Quadrangle Books.Google Scholar
  10. Freud, S. (1954). The interpretation of dreams (J. Strachey, Trans.). London: George Allen Unwin (Original version published in 1900).Google Scholar
  11. Goffman, E. (1968). Asylums. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  12. Hancock, I. (2002). We are the Romany people. Hertford: University of Hertfordshire Press.Google Scholar
  13. Helleiner, J. (2000). Irish travellers: Racism and the politics of culture. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  14. Jacobs, F., & Ries, J. (Eds.). (2008). Roma/Gypsies in new perspectives. Leipzig: Leipziger Universitatsverlag.Google Scholar
  15. Jakoubek, M., & Budilová, L. (2006). Kinship, social organisation and genealogical manipulations in Gypsyosadasin eastern Slovakia. Romani Studies, 16(1), 63–82.  https://doi.org/10.3828/rs.2006.4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaminski, I. M. (1980). The state of ambiguity: Studies of gypsy refugees. Gothenburg: Anthropological Research.Google Scholar
  17. Khalvati, M. (2001). The chine. Manchester: Carcanet.Google Scholar
  18. Leach, E. (1967). An anthropologist’s reflections on a social survey. In D. Jongmans & P. Gutkind (Eds.), Anthropologists in the field (pp. 75–88). Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
  19. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1962). Totemism (R. Needham Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press (Original work published in 1958).Google Scholar
  20. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1973). Tristes tropiques (J. Weightman & D. Weightman, Trans.). London: Jonathan Cape (Original work published in 1955).Google Scholar
  21. Liebich, A. (2007). Roma nation? Competing narratives of nationhood. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mauss, M. (1936). Les techniques du corps. Journal de Psychologie, XXXII(3–4). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  23. Mauss, M. (1954). The gift (I. Cunnison, Trans.). London: Cohen & West (Original version published in 1925).Google Scholar
  24. M.H.L.G. (Ministry of Housing and Local Government). (1967). Gypsies and other Travellers. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
  25. Oakley, A. (1972). Sex, gender and society. London: Temple Smith.Google Scholar
  26. Okely, J. (1983). The Traveller-Gypsies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Okely, J. (1986). Simone de Beauvoir. A re-reading. London: Virago.Google Scholar
  28. Okely, J. (1987). Fieldwork up the M1. Policy and political aspects. In A. Jackson (Ed.), Anthropology at home (pp. 55–73). London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  29. Okely, J. (1992). Anthropology and autobiography. Participatory experience and embodied knowledge. In J. Okely & H. Callaway (Eds.), Anthropology and autobiography (pp. 1–28). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Okely, J. (1996). Own or other culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Okely, J. (1997a). Some political consequences of theories of Gypsy ethnicity. The place of the intellectual. In A. James, J. Hockey, & A. Dawson (Eds.), After writing culture (pp. 224–243). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Okely, J. (1997b). Non-territorial culture as the rationale for the assimilation of Gypsy children. Childhood, 4(1), 63–80.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568297004001004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Okely, J. (2003). The filmed return of the natives – To a colonizing territory of terror. Journal of Media Practice, 3(1), 65–74.  https://doi.org/10.1386/jmpr.3.2.65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Okely, J. (2005). Gypsy justice versus gorgio law. Interrelations of difference. The Sociological Review, 53(4), 691–709.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00591.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Okely, J. (2007). Fieldwork embodied. In C. Shilling (Ed.), Embodying sociology. Retrospect, progress and prospects (pp. 65–79). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  36. Okely, J. (2009). Written out and written in: Inishkillane remembered. Irish Journal of Anthropology, 12(2).Google Scholar
  37. Okely, J. (2012a). The Isle of Wight as a site for English-British identity. In J. Matthews & D. Travers (Eds.), Islands and Britishness. A global perspective (pp. 40–52). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  38. Okely, J. (2012b). Anthropological practice. Fieldwork and the ethnographic method. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  39. Okely, J. (2015). Dialogues with anthropologists. Where interviews become relevant. In K. Smith, J. Staples, & N. Rapport (Eds.), Extraordinary encounters. Authenticity and the interview (pp. 128–156). Oxford: Berghahn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Okely, J., & Callaway, H. (Eds.). (1992). Anthropology and autobiography. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Okely, J., & Houtman, G. (2011). The Dale farm eviction: Interview with Judith Okely on Gypsies and travellers. Anthropology Today, 27(6), 24–27.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8322.2011.00840.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Proust, M. (1913–1927). A la Recherche du temps perdu. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  43. Rosaldo, R. (1986). From the door of his tent. The fieldworker and the inquisitor. In G. E. Marcus & J. Clifford (Eds.), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography (pp. 77–97). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  44. Schaverien, J. (2015). Boarding school syndrome. The psychological trauma of the “privileged” child. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Turner, V. (1969). The ritual process. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  46. Whyte, W. F. (1955). Street corner society. The social structure of an Italian slum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  47. Williams, P. (2003). Gypsy world. The silence of the living and the voices of the dead. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  48. Willems, W. (1997). In search of the true gypsy: From enlightenment to final solution. London: Frank Cass Publishers.Google Scholar
  49. Zulaika, J. (1995). The anthropologist as terrorist. In C. Nordstrom & A. Robben (Eds.), Fieldwork under fire. Studies of violence and survival (pp. 205–222). Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of HullHullUK
  2. 2.School of Anthropology and Museum EthnographyOxford UniversityOxfordUK
  3. 3.Wolfson CollegeOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations