Making Learning Happen: Students’ Development of Academic and Information Literacies

  • Karen GravettEmail author


This chapter considers students’ development of academic and information literacies. Literacy practices have been articulated as ideologically shaped social processes that transcend a simplistic notion of mechanical skills to be learnt, and developing key literacies can be seen to impact upon not just students’ growth in this area, but on their formation of a wider learning identity. However, there may be challenges for students as they develop these literacies. This chapter explores some of the ways students might experience their learning and the relationship between academic and information literacies, and students’ identities. With financial, social and external pressures reconstructing the very nature of what it means to study at university, this chapter argues that the way staff work to make learning happen deserves re-examination.


  1. Anthoney, J., Stead, R., & Turney, K. (2017). Making connections and building resilience: Developing workshops with undergraduates. Knowledge Management and E-Learning, 9(93), 404–418.Google Scholar
  2. Ashworth, P., Banister, P., Thorne, P., & Students on the Qualitative Research Methods Course Unit. (2006). Guilty in whose eyes? University students’ perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 22(2), 187–203.Google Scholar
  3. Barnett, L. (2018). Learning development. In I. M. Kinchin & N. E. Winstone (Eds.), Exploring pedagogic frailty and resilience: Case studies of academic narrative (pp. 187–204). Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  4. Bent, M. (2013). Developing academic literacies. In J. Secker & E. Coonan (Eds.), Rethinking information literacy: A practical framework for supporting learning (pp. 27–40). London: Facet.Google Scholar
  5. Bernstein, B. (1975). Class and pedagogies: Visible and invisible. Educational Studies, 1(1), 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bewick, B., Koutsopoulou, G., Miles, J., Slaa, E., & Barkham, M. (2010). Changes in undergraduate students’ psychological well-being as they progress through university. Studies in Higher Education, 3(6), 633–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  8. Bovill, C. (2017). Breaking down student-staff barriers: Moving towards pedagogic flexibility. In I. M. Kinchin & N. E. Winstone (Eds.), Pedagogic frailty and resilience in the University (pp. 151–162). Rotterdam: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burke, P. J. (2012). The right to higher education. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals Information Literacy Group. (2018). Information literacy. Retrieved from
  12. Christie, H., Tett, L., Cree, V. E., Hounsell, J., & McCune, V. (2008). ‘A real rollercoaster of confidence and emotions’: Learning to be a university student. Studies in Higher Education, 33(5), 567–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crozier, G., & Reay, D. (2011). Capital accumulation: Working-class students learning how to learn in HE. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(2), 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ecclestone, K. (2011). Emotionally-vulnerable subjects and new inequalities: The educational implications of an ‘epistemology of the emotions’. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 21(2), 91–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fischer, T. (2017, August 10). My fellow lecturers won’t say it in public, but students today are moaning, illiterate snowflakes. The Telegraph. Retrieved from
  16. Gale, T., & Parker, S. (2012). Navigating change: A typology of student transition in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 39(5), 734–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gilmore, S., & Anderson, V. (2016). The emotional turn in higher education: A psychoanalytic contribution. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(6), 686–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gourlay, L. (2009). Threshold practices: Becoming a student through academic literacies. London Review of Education, 7(2), 181–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gourlay, L., & Deane, J. (2012). Loss, responsibility, blame? Staff discourses of student plagiarism. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49(1), 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gravett, K., & Kinchin, I. M. (2018). Referencing and empowerment: Exploring barriers to agency in the higher education student experience. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–14.Google Scholar
  21. Gravett, K., & Winstone, N. E. (2018). “Feedback interpreters”: The role of learning development professionals in facilitating university students’ engagement with feedback. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–16. Google Scholar
  22. Grayling, A. C. (2009, November 10). Universities are not there to spoon-feed. The Guardian. Retrieved from
  23. Gulley, N. Y. (2016, August 5). The myth of the nontraditional student. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from
  24. Hockings, C., Thomas, L., Ottaway, J., & Jones, R. (2017). Independent learning—What we do when you’re not there. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(2), 145–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hutchings, C. (2013). Referencing and identity, voice and agency: Adult learners’ transformations within literacy practices. Higher Education Research and Development, 33(2), 312–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ibrahim, A. K., Kelly, S. J., Adams, C. E., & Glazebrook, C. (2013). A systematic review of studies of depression prevalence in university students. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 47(3), 391–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC). (2015). Developing students’ digital literacy. Retrieved from
  28. Jönsson, A. (2013). Facilitating productive use of feedback in higher education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(1), 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Keane, E. (2011). Dependence-deconstruction: Widening participation and traditional-entry students transitioning from school to higher education in Ireland. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(6), 707–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Land, R. (2017). Enhancing quality to address frailty. In I. M. Kinchin & N. E. Winstone (Eds.), Pedagogic frailty and resilience in the university (pp. 179–194). Rotterdam: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lea, M., & Street, B. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lea, M., & Street, B. (2006). The “academic literacies” model: Theory and applications. Theory Into Practice, 45(4), 368–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lillis, T. (2010). Student writing as ‘academic literacies’: Drawing on Bakhtin to move from critique to design. Language and Education, 17(3), 192–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lillis, T., & Tuck, J. (2016). Academic literacies: A critical lens on writing and reading in the academy. In K. Hyland & P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes (pp. 30–43). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Macaskill, A. (2012). The mental health of university students in the United Kingdom. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 41(4), 426–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mann, S. (2001). Alternative perspectives on the student experience: Alienation and engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 26(1), 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mann, S. (2008). Study, power and the university: The institution and its effects on learning. Maidenhead, UK: McGraw Hill/Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Matthews, K. E., Cook-Sather, A., & Healey, M. (2018). Connecting learning, teaching, and research through student-staff partnerships: Toward universities as egalitarian learning communities. In V. Tong, A. Standen, & M. Sotiriou (Eds.), Shaping higher education with students: Ways to connect research and teaching (pp. 23–29). London: UCL Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mazer, J. P., McKenna-Buchanan, T. P., Quinlan, M. M., & Titsworth, S. (2014). The dark side of emotion in the classroom: Emotional processes as mediators of teacher communication behaviors and student negative emotions. Communication Education, 63(3), 149–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Murphy, M. (2011). Troubled by the past: History, identity and the university. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33(5), 509–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Price, M., Rust, C., O’Donovan, B., & Handley, K. (2012). Assessment literacy: The foundation for improving student learning. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff Learning Development.Google Scholar
  42. Quinlan, K. (2016a). How higher education feels: Commentaries on poems that illuminate emotions in learning and teaching. Rotterdam: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Quinlan, K. (2016b). How emotion matters in four key relationships in teaching and learning in higher education. College Teaching, 64(3), 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Robinson, C., & Taylor, C. (2007). Theorizing student voice: Values and perspectives. Improving Schools, 10(1), 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Scanlon, L., Rowling, L., & Weber, Z. (2007). You don’t have like an identity … You are just lost in a crowd: Forming a student identity in the first-year transition to University. Journal of Youth Studies, 10(2), 223–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Scott, D., Hughes, G., Burke, P., Evans, C., Watson, D., & Walter, C. (2014). Learning transitions in higher education. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Secker, J. (2015, December). The trouble with terminology: Rehabilitating and rethinking ‘digital literacy’. Paper presented at the SRHE Research Conference, Celtic Manor, Newport, Wales, UK.Google Scholar
  48. Secker, J. (2017). The trouble with terminology: Rehabilitating and rethinking ‘digital literacy’. In K. Reedy & J. Parker (Eds.), Digital literacy unpacked (pp. 3–16). London: Facet.Google Scholar
  49. Secker, J., & Coonan, E. (2013). Rethinking Information Literacy: A practical framework for supporting learning. London: Facet.Google Scholar
  50. Smith, H. (2008). Spoon-feeding: Or how I learned to stop worrying and love the mess. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(6), 715–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tapp, E. (2013). Being and becoming a student: An investigation into how a pedagogic approach built on collaborative participation in academic literacy practices supports students’ academic practice, knowledge and identity (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
  52. Thomas, L., & Quinn, J. (2007). First generation entry into higher education an international study. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Thompsett, A., & Ahluwalia, J. (2015). Students turned off by Turnitin? Perception of plagiarism and collusion by undergraduate Bioscience students. Bioscience Education, 16(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2005). Communication and information. Retrieved from
  55. Walker, J. (2010). Measuring plagiarism: Researching what students do, not what they say they do. Studies in Higher Education, 35(1), 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Whitchurch, C. (2013). Reconstructing identities in higher education: The rise of third space professionals. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Winstone, N. E. (2017). The ‘3 Rs’ of pedagogic frailty: Risk, reward and resilience. In I. M. Kinchin & N. E. Winstone (Eds.), Pedagogic frailty and resilience in the university (pp. 33–48). Rotterdam: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Rowntree, J., & Parker, M. (2017). ‘It’d be useful, but I wouldn’t use it’: Barriers to university students’ feedback seeking and recipience. Studies in Higher Education, 42(11), 2026–2041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Higher EducationUniversity of SurreyGuildfordUK

Personalised recommendations