Advertisement

Stiffness of Planar 2-DOF 3-Differential Cable-Driven Parallel Robots

  • Lionel Birglen
  • Marc GouttefardeEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Mechanisms and Machine Science book series (Mechan. Machine Science, volume 74)

Abstract

Planar 2-degree-of-freedom (DOF) 3-differential Cable-Driven Parallel Robots (CDPRs) consist of a point-mass end-effector driven by a number of cables. Each cable is divided into four segments, three of them being connected to the point-mass end-effector by means of routing pulleys. This paper deals with the stiffness analysis of such planar 2-DOF 3-differential CDPRs. Based on the usual linear spring cable elongation model, the expression of the stiffness matrix is derived. The stiffness and workspace of several examples of planar 2-DOF 3-differential CDPRs are then compared. The results of these comparisons illustrate that the stiffness of planar CDPRs can be significantly improved by means of pulley differentials.

Keywords

Cable-driven parallel robots differential pulley actuation stiffness analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    H. Khakpour, L. Birglen, and S. Tahan, “Synthesis of differentially driven planar cable parallel manipulators,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 619–630, June 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Khakpour and L. Birglen, “Workspace augmentation of spatial 3-dof cable parallel robots using differential actuation,” in 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Sept 2014, pp. 3880–3885.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Khakpour, L. Birglen, and S.-A. Tahan, “Analysis and optimization of a new differentially driven cable parallel robot,” Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 034 503–034 503–6, Aug 2015. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4028931.
  4. 4.
    S. Behzadipour and A. Khajepour, “Stiffness of cable-based parallel manipulators with application to stability analysis,” ASME J. Mech. Des., vol. 128, pp. 303–310, Jan 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    X. Diao and O. Ma, “Vibration analysis of cable-driven parallel manipulators,” Multibody System Dynamics, vol. 21, pp. 347–360, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Arsenault, “Workspace and stiffness analysis of a three-degree-of-freedom spatial cable-suspended parallel mechanism while considering cable mass,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 66, pp. 1–13, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Yuan, E. Courteille, and D. Deblaise, “Static and dynamic stiffness analyses of cable-driven parallel robots with non-negligible cable mass and elasticity,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 85, pp. 64–81, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. Yuan, E. Courteille, M. Gouttefarde, and P.-E. Hervé, “Vibration analysis of cable-driven parallel robots based on the dynamic stiffness matrix method,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 394, pp. 527–544, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Anson, A. Alamdari, and V. Krovi, “Orientation workspace and stiffness optimization of cable-driven parallel manipulators with base mobility,” ASME Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, vol. 9, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Abdolshah, D. Zanotto, G. Rosati, and S. K. Agrawal, “Optimizing stiffness and dexterity of planar adaptive cable-driven parallel robots,” ASME Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, vol. 9, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. Jamshidifar, A. Khajepour, B. Fidan, and M. Rushton, “Kinematically-constrained redundant cable-driven parallel robots: Modeling, redundancy analysis, and stiffness optimization,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 921–930, April 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. Nelson, “On improving stiffness of cable robots,” in Cable-Driven Parallel Robots - Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Cable-Driven Parallel Robots, ser. Mechanisms and Machine Science, vol. 53. Netherlands: Springer Netherlands, 2018, pp. 331–339.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Gouttefarde and C. M. Gosselin, “Analysis of the wrench-closure workspace of planar parallel cable-driven mechanisms,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 434–445, June 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. Bosscher, A. T. Riechel, and I. Ebert-Uphoff, “Wrench-feasible workspace generation for cable-driven robots,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 890–902, Oct 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringPolytechnique MontréalMontrealCanada
  2. 2.LIRMM, University of Montpellier, CNRSMontpellierFrance

Personalised recommendations