Advertisement

Development of Resilient Health Information Infrastructure in Complex, Dynamic and Resource Constrained Health Care Context

  • Birkinesh Woldeyohannes LageboEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 558)

Abstract

This research concerns the standardization strategy and organizational resilience behavior and action while designing and implementing HIS in low resource country context. Considerable IS research have been conducted to understand HIS standardization strategy and organizational resilience independently. This paper employed holistic approach, drawing up on organizational resilient and standardization literature based on interpretive case study approach, explores the process of electronic health management information system (eHMIS) design, implementation in low resource country to understand the interplay between organizational resilience and standardization strategy. The major research question guiding this study is how e-HMIS design and implementation process addressed the continuous change of health care in resource constrained context with a focus on resilience and standardization strategy.

Keywords

Implementation e-HMIS HIS Resilient Standardization Information infrastructure 

References

  1. 1.
    Abbate, J.: Inventing the Internet. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Avgerou, C., Walsham, G.: Information Technology in Context; Studies from the Perspectives of Developing Countries. Ashgate, Hampshire (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Avgerou, C., McGrath, K.: Power, rationality, and the art of living through socio technical change. MIS Q. 31, 295–315 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Avegrou, C.: New socio-technical perspectives of is innovation in organizations. In: Larover, R.L. (eds.) ICT Innovation: Economic and Organizational Perspectives. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Avgero, C.: Information systems in developing countries: a critical research review. J. Inf. Technol. 23, 133–146 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Braa, J., et al.: A study of the actual and potential usage of information and communication technology at district and provincial levels in Mozambique with a focus on the health sector. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Countries 5(2) (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Braa, J., Monteiro, E., Sahay, S.: Networks of action: sustainable health information systems across developing countries. MIS Q. 337–362 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Braa, J., Hedberg, C.: The struggle for district-based health information systems in South Africa. Inf. Soc. 18, 113–127 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Braa, J., Hanseth, O., Heywood, A., Mohammed, W., Shaw, V.: Developing health information systems in developing countries: the flexible standards strategy. MIS Q. 31(2), 381–402 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Benbasat, I., et al.: The case research strategy in studies of information systems. In: Myers, M.D., Avison, D. (eds.) Qualitative Research in Information Systems: A Reader, pp. 79–99. SAGE Publications, London (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brunsson, N., Jacobsson, B.: The contemporary expansion of standardization. In: Brunsson, N., Jacobsson, B., (eds.) A World of Standards. Oxford University Press, New York (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brunsson, N., Rasche, A., Seidl, D.: The dynamics of standardization: three perspectives on standards in organization studies. Organ. Stud. 33(5–6), 613–632 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Coutu, D.L.: How resilience works. Harvard Bus. Rev. 80(5), 46–55 (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cho, S., Mathiassen, L., Robey, D.: Dialectics of resilience: a multi-level analysis of a telehealth innovation. J. Inf. Technol. 22, 24–35 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cho, S., Mathiassen, L., Nilsson, A.: Contextual dynamics during health information systems implementation: an event-based actor-network approach. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 17, 614–630 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Concept notes and status of ICT programmes implementation, p. 16 (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chandwani, R., De, R., Dwivedi, Y.K.: Telemedicine for low resource settings: exploring the generative mechanisms. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 127, 177–187 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dwivedi, A., Shareef, M., Simintiras, A., Lal, B., Weerakkody, V.: A generalised adoption model for services: a cross-country comparison of mobile health (m-health). Gov. Inf. Q. 33, 174–187 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    FMOH-Ethiopia: Health Management Information System (HMIS)/Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Strategic Plan for Ethiopian Health Sector. HMIS Reform Team. Federal Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grisot, M.: Infrastructures in healthcare: the interplay between generativity and standardization. Int. J. Med. Inf. 82(5), 170–179 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hanseth, M., Bygstad, B.: Flexible generification: ICTstandardization strategies and service innovation in health care. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 24, 645–663 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hanseth, O., Monteiro, E.: Inscribing behaviour in information infrastructure standards. Acc. Manag. Inf. Syst. 7(4), 183–211 (1997)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hamel, G., Valikangas, L.: The quest for resilience. Harvard Bus. Rev. 81(9), 52–63 (2003)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hanseth, O., Aanestad, M.: Bootstrapping networks, communities and infrastructures – on the evolution of ICT solutions in healthcare. Methods Inf. Med. 42(4), 385–391 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Heeks, R.: Health information systems: failure, success and improvisation. Int. J. Med. Inf. 75(2), 125–137 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hanseth, O., Monteiro, E., Hatling, M.: Developing information infrastructure: the tension between standardization and flexibility. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 21(4), 407–426 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Herrera, A., Janczewski, L.: Modelling organizational resilience in the cloud. In: PACIS Proceedings, p. 275 (2013)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hewapathirana, R., Sahay, S.: Open source adoption in health sector: understanding the stakeholder relationships in a resource constrained setting. EJISDC 81(1), 1–21 (2017)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Igira, F.T.: The situatedness of work practices and organizational culture: implications for information systems innovation uptake. J. Inf. Technol. 23(2), 79–88 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Klein, H., Myers, M.: A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Q. 23(1), 67–94 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lagebo, B., Molla, S.: Challenges of scaling and standardization HIS implementation. MSC thesis, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo (2005)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Liu, V., Caelli, W., Yang, Y., Lauren, M.: A test vehicle for compliance with resilience requirements in index-based e-health systems. In: PACIS Proceedings, p. 119 (2011)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lippeveld, T., Sauerborn, R., Bodart, C. (eds.): Design and implementation of health (2000)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lo, J., Leidner, D.: Extending the IS strategy topology: an assessment of strategy impacts on capabilities development performance. In: Thirty Third International Conference on Information Systems, Orlando (2012)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mallak, L.: Putting Organizational Resilience to Work. Industrial Management IIE (1998). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291863333. Accessed 2 Aug 2018
  36. 36.
    Myers, M.D., Avison, D. (eds.): Qualitative Research in Information Systems. SAGE Publications, London (2002)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mekonnen, S., Sahay, S.: An institutional analysis on the dynamics of the interaction between standardizing and scaling processes: a case study from Ethiopia. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 18, 98 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mengesha, T.: Electronic Solutions for Ethiopian Health Sector (2011)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mintzbergh, H.: Patterns in strategy formation. Manag. Sci. 24(9), 934–948 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Neilson, P., Hanseth, O.: Towards a design theory of usability and generativity. In: ECIS (2015)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pollock, N., Williams, R., D’adderio, L.: Global software and its provenance: generification work in the production of organizational software packages. Soc. Stud. Sci. 37(2), 254–280 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Radnitzky, G.: Contemporary Schools of Metascience. Scandinavian University Books, Goteborg (1970)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Reinmoeller, P., Baardwijk, N.V.: The link between diversity and resilience. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 46(4), 61–65 (2005)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Riolli, L., Savicki, V.: Information system organizational resilience. Omega: Int. J. Manag. Sci. 31(3), 227–233 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sheared, S.: A frame work for system resilience discussions (2008)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sahay, S., Monteiro, H., Aanstaad, M.: Toward a political perspective of integration in information systems research: the case of health information systems in India. Inf. Technol. Dev. 15(2), 83–94 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Taylor-Powel, E., Renner, M.: Analyzing qualitative data. University of Wisconsin Cooperative Extension. Publication G3658-6 (2003)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Updegrove, A.: Breaking down trade barriers: avoiding the China syndrome. Consortium Standards Bulletin, 3 May 2004Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Van den Ende, J., Van de Kaa, G., Den Uijl, S., De Vries, H.J.: The paradox of standard flexibility: the effects of co-evolution between standard and interorganizational network. Organ. Stud. 33(5–6), 705–736 (2012)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wareham, H., Fox, P., Lluis, J.: Technology ecosystem governance. Organ. Sci. 25(4), 1195–1215 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Walsham, G., Sahay, S.: Research on information systems in developing countries: current landscape and future prospects. Inf. Technol. Dev. 12(1), 7–24 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Walsham, G.: Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 4(2), 74–81 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Yin, R.K.: Applications of Case Study Research. Sage Publications (2002)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Chandwani, R.K., Dwivedi, Y.K.: Telemedicine in India: current state, challenges and opportunities. Transform. Gov.: People Process Policy 9(4), 393–400 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Dwivedi, Y.K., Shareef, M.A., Simintiras, A.C., Lal, B., Weerakkody, V.: A generalised adoption model for services: a cross-country comparison of mobile health (m-health). Gov. Inf. Q. 33(1), 174–187 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Addis Ababa UniversityAddis AbabaEthiopia

Personalised recommendations