Advertisement

Theoretical Framework for Digital Payments in Rural India: Integrating UTAUT and Empowerment Theory

  • Manisha Sharma
  • Sujeet K. SharmaEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 558)

Abstract

Indian economy is considered as one of the most promising and fast growing among all developing countries in the world. In the current global scenario, India has a number of strengths namely younger population, greater access to mobile phones, increasing technical competence and digital literacy among others. Indian government initiated a number of steps to incorporate information technology (IT) tools in public institutions to increase transparency, remove middlemen, and minimize digital divide. Digital payment is one of the prominent applications of the ICT in the past couple of years due to some of the initiatives of government of India like demonetization, and digital India. However, around 67% of Indian Population still lives in rural areas and thereby it is imperative to understand the behavioral intention to use and its continuous usage of digital payments in rural population of India. This research attempts to develop a theoretical research framework by integrating psychological empowerment theory and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) to explore and understand perception of rural population towards digital payments in Indian context. Researchers using structural equation modeling or other statistical models may test the proposed research framework. In this research framework, second order of empowerment construct is proposed, which is rarely available in the extant literature. The findings of this research will be useful to government agencies, financial institutions, mobile and telecommunications operators, and researchers. This paper is a working paper and intends to further test the theoretical model proposed as the ongoing work.

Keywords

Digital payments UTAUT Empowerment theory Rural India 

References

  1. Alalwan, A.A., Baabdullah, A., Rana, N.P., Tamilmani, K., Dwivedi, Y.K.: Examining adoption of mobile internet in Saudi Arabia: extending TAM with perceived enjoyment, innovativeness and trust. Technol. Soc. 55, 100–110 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alalwan, A.A., Dwivedi, Y.K., Rana, N.P.: Factors influencing adoption of mobile banking by Jordanian bank customers: extending UTAUT2 with trust. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 37(3), 99–110 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arango-Arango, C.A., Bouhdaoui, Y., Bounie, D., Eschelbach, E., Hernandez, L.: Cash remains top-of-wallet! International evidence from payment diaries. Econ. Model. 69, 38–48 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beijnen, C., Bolt, W.: Size matters: economies of scale in European payments processing. J. Bank. Financ. 33(2), 203–210 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bista, D.R., Kumar, P., Mathur, V.C.: Progress and performance of Kisan Credit Card Scheme with a case study of Bihar. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev. 25(1), 125–135 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. Bolt, W., Humphrey, D.: Payment network scale economies, SEPA, and cash replacement. Rev. Netw. Econ. 6(4), 1–21 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crabbe, M., Standing, C., Standing, S., Karjaluoto, H.: An adoption model for mobile banking in Ghana. Int. J. Mob. Commun. 7(5), 515–543 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chauhan, S.: Acceptance of mobile money by poor citizens of India: integrating trust into the technology acceptance model. Info 17(3), 58–68 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chong, A.Y.L.: Predicting m-commerce adoption determinants: a neural network approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 40(2), 523–530 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Creehan, S.: India’s Digital Payments: growing consumer trust, but merchants needed (2018). https://www.frbsf.org/banking/asia-program/pacific-exchange-blog/indias-digital-payments-growing-consumer-trust-but-merchants-needed
  11. Davis, F.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dwivedi, Y.K., Rana, N.P., Janssen, M., Lal, B., Williams, M.D., Clement, M.: An empirical validation of a unified model of electronic government adoption (UMEGA). Gov. Inf. Q. 34(2), 211–230 (2017a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dwivedi, Y.K., Rana, N.P., Jeyaraj, A., Clement, M., Williams, M.D.: Re-examining the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): towards a revised theoretical model. Inf. Syst. Front. 1–16 (2017b).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9774-y
  14. Dwivedi, Y.K., Shareef, M.A., Simintiras, A.C., Lal, B., Weerakkody, V.: A generalised adoption model for services: a cross-country comparison of mobile health (m-health). Gov. Inf. Q. 33(1), 174–187 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gregor, S.: The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Q. 30(3), 611–642 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hew, J.J., Lee, V.-H., Ooi, K.-B., Wei, J.: What catalyses mobile apps usage intention: an empirical analysis. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 115(7), 1269–1291 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hong, W., Chan, F.K.Y., Thong, J.Y.L., Chasalow, L.C., Dhillon, G.: A framework and guidelines for context-specific theorizing in information systems research. Inf. Syst. Res. 25(1), 111–136 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hromcová, J., Callado-Muñoz, F.J., Utrero-González, N.: Effects of direct pricing of retail payment methods in Norway. Econ. Model. 37, 428–438 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. India Today: Here is what PM Modi said about the new Rs. 500, Rs. 2000 notes and black money (2016). Accessed 9 Nov 2016Google Scholar
  20. Internet and mobile association of India (IMAI) (2018)Google Scholar
  21. Kang, M.: Understanding public engagement: conceptualizing and measuring its influence on supportive behavioral intentions. J. Pub. Relat. Res. 26(5), 399–416 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kapoor, K.K., Dwivedi, Y.K., Williams, M.D.: Examining the role of three sets of innovation attributes for determining adoption of the interbank mobile payment service. Inf. Syst. Front. 17(5), 1039–1056 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kim, H.W., Chan, H.C., Gupta, S.: Value-based adoption of mobile internet: an empirical investigation. Dec. Supp. Syst. 43(1), 111–126 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kim, D.J., Ferrin, D.L., Rao, H.R.: Trust and satisfaction, two stepping stones for successful e-commerce relationships: a longitudinal exploration. Inf. Syst. Res. 20(2), 237–257 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kuo, Y.-F., Wu, C.-M., Deng, W.-J.: The relationships among service quality, perceived value, customer satisfaction and post-purchase intention in mobile value-added services. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25, 887–896 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee, A.S., Baskerville, R.L.: Generalizing generalizability in information systems research. Inf. Syst. Res. 14(3), 221–243 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leong, L.-Y., Hew, T.-S., Tan, G.W.-H., Ooi, K.-B.: Predicting the determinants of the NFC-enabled mobile credit card acceptance: a neural networks approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 40(14), 5604–5620 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lewis, C.C., Fretwell, C.E., Ryan, J., Parham, J.B.: Faculty use of established and emerging technologies in higher education: a unified theory of acceptance and use of technology perspective. Int. J. High. Educ. 2(2), 22–34 (2013)Google Scholar
  29. Luo, X., Li, H., Zhang, J., Shim, J.P.: Examining multi-dimensional trust and multifaceted risk in initial acceptance of emerging technologies: an empirical study of mobile banking services. Dec. Supp. Syst. 49(2), 222–234 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moon, J.W., Kim, Y.G.: Extending the TAM for a world-wide-web context. Inf. Manag. 38(4), 217–230 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Naranjo-Zolotov, M., Oliveira, T., Casteleyn, S.: Citizens’ intention to use and recommend e-participation: drawing upon UTAUT and citizen empowerment. Inf. Technol. People 32(2), 364–386 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. NPCI Statistics: Electronic Payment System-representative data by RBI (2018). https://www.npci.org.in/statistics
  33. Oh, J.-C., Yoon, S.-J.: Predicting the use of online information services based on a modified UTAUT model. Behav. Inf. Technol. 33(7), 716–729 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Patil, P.P., Rana, N.P., Dwivedi, Y.K.: Digital payments adoption research: a review of factors influencing consumer’s attitude, intention and usage. In: Al-Sharhan, S., et al. (eds.) Challenges and Opportunities in the Digital Era. LNCS, vol. 11195, pp. 45–52. Springer, Cham (2018a).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02131-3_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Patil, P.P., Rana, N.P., Dwivedi, Y.K.: Digital payments adoption research: a meta-analysis for generalising the effects of attitude, cost, innovativeness, mobility and price value on behavioural intention. In: Elbanna, A., Dwivedi, Y., Bunker, D., Wastell, D. (eds.) Smart Working, Living and Organising. IFIPAICT, vol. 533, pp. 194–206. Springer, Cham (2018b).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04315-5_14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Patil, P.P., Dwivedi, Y.K., Rana, N.P.: Digital payments adoption: an analysis of literature. In: Kar, A., et al. (eds.) Digital Nations – Smart Cities, Innovation, and Sustainability. LNCS, vol. 10595, pp. 61–70. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68557-1_7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pikkarainen, T., Pikkarainen, K., Karjaluoto, H., Pahnila, S.: Consumer acceptance of online banking: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Internet Res. 14(3), 224–235 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sharma, S.K., Sharma, M.: Examining the role of trust and quality dimensions in the actual usage of mobile banking services: an empirical investigation. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 44, 65–75 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Slade, E.L., Dwivedi, Y.K., Piercy, N.C., Williams, M.D.: Modeling consumers’ adoption intentions of remote mobile payments in the United Kingdom: extending UTAUT with innovativeness, risk, and trust. Psychol. Mark. 32(8), 860–873 (2015a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Slade, E., Williams, M., Dwivedi, Y., Piercy, N.: Exploring consumer adoption of proximity mobile payments. J. Strat. Mark. 23(3), 209–223 (2015b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Spreitzer, G.M.: Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Acad. Manag. J. 39(2), 483–505 (1996)Google Scholar
  42. Tamilmani, K., Rana, N.P., Dwivedi, Y.K.: Use of ‘habit’ is not a habit in understanding individual technology adoption: a review of UTAUT2 based empirical studies. In: Elbanna, A., Dwivedi, Y., Bunker, D., Wastell, D. (eds.) Smart Working, Living and Organising. IFIPAICT, vol. 533, pp. 277–294. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04315-5_19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tamilmani, K., Rana, N.P., Prakasam, N., Dwivedi, Y.K.: The battle of brain vs. heart: a literature review and meta-analysis of “hedonic motivation” use in UTAUT2. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 46, 222–235 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tam, C., Oliveira, T.: Understanding the impact of m-banking on individual performance: DeLone & McLean and TTF perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 61, 233–244 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thakur, R.: Customer adoption of mobile payment services by professionals across two cities in India: An empirical study using modified technology acceptance model. Bus. Perspect. Res. 1, 17–29 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Thakur, R., Srivastava, M.: Adoption readiness, personal innovativeness, perceived risk and usage intention across customer groups for mobile payment services in India. Internet Res. 24, 369–392 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. The Economist: the dire consequences of india’s demonetisation initiative. The Economist 3 December 2016. Accessed 5 Jan 2017Google Scholar
  48. ToI: Notes out of circulation (2016). Accessed 8 Nov 2016Google Scholar
  49. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27(3), 425–478 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y., Chan, F.K., Hu, P.J.: Managing citizens’ uncertainty in e-government services: the mediating and moderating roles of transparency and trust. Inf. Syst. Res. 27(1), 87–111 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y.L., Xu, X.: Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q. 36(1), 157–178 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Weber, R.: Editor’s comments. MIS Q. 27(2), iii–xii (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wei, T.T., Marthandan, G., Chong, A.Y.L., Ooi, K.B., Arumugam, S.: What drives Malaysian m-commerce adoption? An empirical analysis. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 109(3), 370–388 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Williams, M.D., Rana, N.P., Dwivedi, Y.K., Lal, B.: Is UTAUT really used or just cited for the sake of it? A systematic review of citations of UTAUT’s originating article. In: ECIS, p. 231, June 2011Google Scholar
  55. Zimmerman, M.A.: Psychological empowerment: issues and illustrations. Am. J. Community Psychol. 23(5), 581–599 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zimmerman, M.A., Rappaport, J.: Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment. Am. J. Community Psychol. 16(5), 725–750 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., Dwivedi, Y.K.: Acceptance and use predictors of open data technologies: drawing upon the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Gov. Inf. Q. 32(4), 429–440 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementGautam Buddha UniversityGreater NoidaIndia
  2. 2.MIS Area, Indian Institute of Management TiruchirappalliTiruchirappalliIndia

Personalised recommendations