For boundary theorists, the dissolution of a perceived boundary—such as that between workshop-based teaching and extra-mural community engagement—might lead to a significant change in behaviour, thus generating a new, potentially more equitable, social boundary. Boundaries between the academy and the wider world are being made more porous as a means of serving social justice, enabling more people to realise their potential as learners. This chapter demonstrates how some art schools have rationalised permeable internal and external boundaries that enable more diverse and equitable forms of identification that, in turn, encourage the co-creation of socially robust knowledge. From the imaginary of the ruined academy, the pecuniary performance of disciplinary ‘units of resource’ is the key to determining the scale and shape of art schools. To rationalise more productive and inclusive forms of identification, art schools need to optimally position their resources on the axes of vertical integration (fat-head) and horizontal integration (long-tail). Combining Birger Wernerfelt’s resource-based view and Michael Porter’s positioning school may enable art schools to make their resources more heterogeneous and porous. Art schools have primarily taken a resource-based view of porosity, diversifying their internal resources—in the form of ‘complimentary studies’—to offer more variety and breadth. Art schools that have pursued the kind of holistic curriculum reform promised by Joyce VanTassel-Baska’s ‘integrated curriculum model’ (ICM), however, have encouraged more permeable boundaries that enable more diverse and equitable forms of artistic practice to emerge.
KeywordsPermeability Porosity Curriculum reform
- Anderson, C. (2004). The Long Tail. Wired, 12(10), 170–177.Google Scholar
- Argyris, C. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA and London: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Ascott, R. (2003). Behaviourist Art and the Cybernetic Vision. In E. A. Shanken (Ed.), Telematic Embrace: Visionary Theories of Art, Technology, and Consciousness. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Barthelme, D. (1997). Not-Knowing. In K. Herzinger (Ed.), Not-Knowing: The Essays and Interviews of Donald Barthelme (pp. 11–24). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
- Baxandall, M. (1972). Painting and Experience in Fifteenth Century Italy: A Primer in the Social History of Pictorial Style. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Bruner, J. S. (1960). The Process of Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Bruner, J. S. (1961). The Act of Discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21–32.Google Scholar
- Cole, M. W., & Pardo, M. (2005). Origins of the Studio. In M. W. Cole & M. Pardo (Eds.), Inventions of the Studio: Renaissance to Romanticism (pp. 1–35). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
- Coles, A. (2012). The Transdisciplinary Studio. Berlin: Sternberg Press.Google Scholar
- Corneli, J., & Mikroyannidis, A. (2011). Personalised Peer-Supported Learning: The Peer-to-Peer Learning Environment (P2PLE). Digital Education Review, 20, 14–23.Google Scholar
- Deem, R., Hillyard, S., & Reed, M. (2007). New Managerialism and Public Services Reform: From Regulated Autonomy to Institutionalized Distrust. In S. Hillyard & M. Reed (Eds.), Knowledge, Higher Education, and the New Managerialism: The Changing Management of UK Universities (pp. 1–29). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Deetz, J. (1977). In Small Things Forgotten: The Archaeology of Early American Life. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press/Doubleday.Google Scholar
- Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the Societies of Control. October, 59, 3–7.Google Scholar
- Dobbs, S. M. (1992). The DBAE Handbook: An Overview of Discipline-Based Art Education. Santa Monica, CA: Getty Center for Education in the Arts.Google Scholar
- Dobbs, S. M. (2004). Discipline-Based Art Education. In E. W. Eisner & M. D. Day (Eds.), Handbook of Research and Policy in Art Education (pp. 701–724). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Downes, S. (2011). Moving Beyond Self-Directed Learning: Network-Directed Learning. Stephen Downes: Knowledge, Learning, Community. http://www.downes.ca/post/55361.
- Efland, A., Freedman, K., & Stuhr, P. L. (1996). Postmodern Art Education: An Approach to Curriculum. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.Google Scholar
- Getty Center for Education in the Arts. (1985). Beyond Creating: The Place for Art in America’s Schools (p. 89). Los Angeles, CA: Getty Center for Education in the Arts.Google Scholar
- Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Grootenboer, P., Edwards-Groves, C., & Choy, S. (2017). Practice Theory and Education: Diversity and Contestation. In P. Grootenboer, C. Edwards-Groves, & S. Choy (Eds.), Practice Theory Perspectives on Pedagogy and Education: Praxis, Diversity and Contestation (pp. 1–21). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Heron, J. (1971). Experience and Method: An Inquiry into the Concept of Experiential Research. Human Potential Research Project, University of Surrey, Guildford.Google Scholar
- Higgins, D. (1967). Statement on Intermedia. In W. Vostell (Ed.), Dé-coll/age (décollage) 6. Frankfurt: Typos Verlag.Google Scholar
- Jahoda, S., Murphy, B., Virgin, V., & Woolard, C. (2014). Artists Report Back: A National Study on the Lives of Arts Graduates and Working Artists (BFAMFAPhD). Retrieved from bfamfaphd.com.
- Jay, M. (2012). The Menace of Consilience: Keeping the Disciplines Unreconciled. In R. Foshay (Ed.), Valences of Interdisciplinarity: Theory, Practice, Pedagogy (pp. 31–46). Edmonton: Athabasca University Press.Google Scholar
- Kowaltowski, D. C. C., Bernardi, N., & Martin, C. (2015). Universal Design Pedagogy Through a Charrette to Increase Professional Sensitivity. Journal of Accessibility and Design for All, 5(1), 47–76.Google Scholar
- Manning, E., & Massumi, B. (2004–). SenseLab. Retrieved October 30, 2017, from http://senselab.ca/wp2/about/.
- Nichols, B. (2010). How Can We Describe the Observational, Participatory, Reflexive, Performative Modes of Documentary Film? In B. Nichols (Ed.), Introduction to Documentary (2nd ed., pp. 172–211). Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Parsons, M. (2004). Art and Integrated Curriculum. In E. W. Eisner & M. D. Day (Eds.), Handbook of Research and Policy in Art Education (pp. 775–794). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- PNCA. (2017). Boundary Crossings. Retrieved October 30, 2017, from http://pnca.edu/programs/c/boundarycrossing.
- Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Readings, B. (1997). The University in Ruins. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Rietveld, R. (2014). Vacancy Studies: Experiments & Strategic Interventions in Architecture. Rotterdam, NL: nai010 Publishers.Google Scholar
- Senge, P. M. (1992). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. London: Century Business.Google Scholar
- Smith, R. A. (1989). Discipline-Based Art Education: Origins, Meaning, and Development. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
- Thrift, N. (2008). Non-representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar