Effects of Different Grassland Management Patterns on Soil Properties on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau

  • Jianjun CaoEmail author
  • Xueyun Xu
  • Shurong Yang
  • Mengtian Li
  • Yifan Gong


Change in grassland management pattern has an important effect on ecological function of grassland. Two grassland management patterns were developed after grassland contacted to individual households on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, namely multi-household management pattern (MMP) without fences among households, and single-household management (SMP) with fences between adjacent households. Two representative counties (Maqu and Nagchu) of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau were selected to compare variation in soil properties between MMP and SMP, and pH, SOC, STN, and STP were selected as indictors of soil properties. The results showed that in Maqu SOC, STN, and STP were all significantly greater under MMP compared to SMP, in Nagchu, their values were also significantly different between them. All of these suggested that MMP without fences among households is of better soil condition than SMP with fences on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.


The Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau Grassland contact policy Grassland management Soil properties Carbon losses 


  1. Abuman, W.G. Zhang, and M. Chang. 2012. Present situation investigation after grassland contracted by individual households in Gannan pastoral area, Gansu province. Pratacultural Science 29 (12): 1945–1950.Google Scholar
  2. Adger, W.N., T.P. Hughes, C. Folke, et al. 2005. Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science 309 (5737): 1036–1039.Google Scholar
  3. Askari, M.S., and N.M. Holden. 2014. Indices for quantitative evaluation of soil quality under grassland management. Geoderma 230–231 (7): 131–142.Google Scholar
  4. Cai, H., and W.J. Li. 2016. A study on efficiency and equity of rangeland management on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau in different property right systems. Journal of Natural Resources 31: 1302–1309.Google Scholar
  5. Cao, J.J., Y.C. Xiong, J. Sun, et al. 2011. Differential benefits of multi- and single-household grassland management patterns in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau of China. Human Ecology 39 (2): 217–227.Google Scholar
  6. Cao, J.J., N.M. Holden, Y.Y. Qin, et al. 2012. Potential use of willingness to accept (WTA) to compensate herders in Maqu county, China, for reduced stocking. Rangeland Ecology & Management 65 (5): 533–537.Google Scholar
  7. Cao, J.J., E.T. Yeh, N.M. Holden, et al. 2013a. The effects of enclosures and land-use contracts on rangeland degradation on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Arid Environments 97 (10): 3–8.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 2013b. The roles of overgrazing, climate change and policy as drivers of degradation of China’s grasslands. Nomadic Peoples 17 (2): 82–101.Google Scholar
  9. Cao, J.J., Y.F. Gong, E.T. Yeh, et al. 2017. Impact of grassland contract policy on soil organic carbon losses from alpine grassland on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Soil Use and Management 33 (4): 663–671.Google Scholar
  10. Cao, J.J., M.T. Li, R.C. Deo, et al. 2018a. Comparison of social-ecological resilience between two grassland management patterns driven by grassland land contract policy in the Maqu, Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Land Use Policy 74 (5): 88–96.Google Scholar
  11. Cao, J.J., X.Y. Xu, R.C. Deo, et al. 2018b. Multi-household grazing management pattern maintains better soil fertility. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 38 (1): 6–12.Google Scholar
  12. Cao, J.J., X.Y. Wang, and M.T. Li. 2018c. Effects of different grassland use patterns on soil nutrients and spatial distribution on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology 29 (6): 1839–1845.Google Scholar
  13. Chaudhuri, S., L.M. Mcdonald, J. Skousen, et al. 2015. Soil organic carbon molecular properties: Effects of time since reclamation in a minesoil chronosequence. Land Degradation and Development 26 (3): 237–248.Google Scholar
  14. Chen, H.Y., and T. Zhu. 2015. The dilemma of property rights and indigenous institutional arrangements for common resources governance in China. Land Use Policy 42 (1): 800–805.Google Scholar
  15. Christensen, L., M.B. Coughenour, J.E. Ellis, et al. 2004. Vulnerability of the Asian typical steppe to grazing and climate change. Climatic Change 63 (3): 351–368.Google Scholar
  16. Dietz, T., E. Ostrom, and P.C. Stern. 2003. The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302 (5652): 1907–1912.Google Scholar
  17. Dlamini, P., P. Chivenge, A. Manson, et al. 2014. Land degradation impact on soil organic carbon and nitrogen stocks of sub-tropical humid grasslands in South Africa. Geoderma 235–236 (4): 372–381.Google Scholar
  18. Dong, S.K., L. Wen, S.L. Liu, et al. 2011. Vulnerability of worldwide pastoralism to global changes and interdisciplinary strategies for sustainable pastoralism. Ecology and Society 16 (2): 85–99.Google Scholar
  19. Dong, S.K., L. Wen, Y.Y. Li, et al. 2012. Soil-quality effects of grassland degradation and restoration on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Soil Science Society of America Journal 76 (6): 2256–2264.Google Scholar
  20. Dorji, T., Ø. Totland, and S.R. Moe. 2013. Are droppings, distance from pastoralist camps, and Pika burrows good proxies for local grazing pressure? Rangeland Ecology and Management 66: 26–33.Google Scholar
  21. Du, F.C., and S.H. Zhang. 2013. Economic transition of pastoralism in western. China, Beijing: Intellectual Property Publishing House.Google Scholar
  22. Dutta, P.K., and R.K. Sundaram. 1993. The tragedy of the commons? Economic Theory 3 (3): 413–426.Google Scholar
  23. Elsenbroich, C., and H. Verhagen. 2016. The simplicity of complex agents: A contextual action framework for computational agents. Mind and Society 15 (1): 131–143.Google Scholar
  24. Fassnacht, F.E., L. Li, and A. Fritz. 2015. Mapping degraded grassland on the eastern Tibetan Plateau with multi-temporal Landsat 8 data-where do the severely degraded areas occur? International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 42 (10): 115–127.Google Scholar
  25. Feeny, D., F. Berkes, B.J. McCay, et al. 1990. The tragedy of the commons: Twenty-two years later. Human Ecology 18 (1): 1–19.Google Scholar
  26. Flanagan, C., and M. Laituri. 2004. Local cultural knowledge and water resource management: The wind river Indian reservation. Environmental Management 33 (2): 262–277.Google Scholar
  27. Foggin, M. 2012. Pastoralists and wildlife conservation in western China: Collaborative management within protected areas on the Tibetan Plateau. Research Policy and Practice 2: 17–35.Google Scholar
  28. Franco, D., and L. Luiselli. 2014. Shared ecological knowledge and wetland values: A case study. Land Use Policy 41 (4): 526–532.Google Scholar
  29. Franzén, F., M. Hammer, and B. Balfors. 2015. Institutional development for stakeholder participation in local water management-an analysis of two Swedish catchments. Land Use Policy 43: 217–227.Google Scholar
  30. Fu, Y., R.E. Grumbine, A. Wilkes, et al. 2012. Climate change adaptation among Tibetan pastoralists: Challenges in enhancing local adaptation through policy support. Environmental Management 50: 607–621.Google Scholar
  31. Gongbuzeren, and W.J. Li. 2016. The role of market mechanisms and customary institutions in rangeland management: A case study in Qinghai Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Natural Resources 31 (10): 1637–1647.Google Scholar
  32. Gongbuzeren, Y.B. Li, and W.J. Li. 2015. China’s rangeland management policy debates: What have we learned? Rangeland Ecology and Management 68 (4): 305–314.Google Scholar
  33. Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 62: 1243–1248.Google Scholar
  34. He, J.Z., R.W. Wang, C.X. Jensen, et al. 2015. Asymmetric interaction paired with a super-rational strategy might resolve the tragedy of the commons without requiring recognition or negotiation. Scientific Reports 5: 7715.Google Scholar
  35. Heller, M.A., and R.S. Eisenberg. 1998. Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. Science 280 (5364): 698–701.Google Scholar
  36. Herbin, T., D. Hennessy, K.G. Richards, et al. 2011. The effects of dairy cow weight on selected soil physical properties indicative of compaction. Soil Use and Management 27: 36–44.Google Scholar
  37. Hirsch, P.R., D. Jhurreea, J.K. Williams, et al. 2017. Soil resilience and recovery: Rapid community responses to management changes. Plant and Soil 412 (1–2): 283–297.Google Scholar
  38. Hua, L.M., and V.R. Squires. 2015. Managing China’s pastoral lands: Current problems and future prospects. Land Use Policy 43: 129–137.Google Scholar
  39. Hua, L.M., S.W. Yang, V. Squires, et al. 2015. An alternative rangeland management strategy in an agro-pastoral area in western China. Rangeland Ecology and Management 68 (2): 109–118.Google Scholar
  40. Lehnert, L.W., H. Meyer, N. Meyer, et al. 2014. A hyperspectral indicator system for rangeland degradation on the Tibetan Plateau: A case study towards spaceborne monitoring. Ecological Indicators 39: 54–64.Google Scholar
  41. Li, M.T., Y.Y. Qin, J.J. Cao, et al. 2018. Effects of different grassland management patterns on soil stoichiometry on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau: A case study from Nagqu. Chinese Journal of Ecology 37 (8): 2262–2268.Google Scholar
  42. Lu, J., Z. Dong, W. Li, et al. 2014. The effect of desertification on carbon and nitrogen status in the northeastern margin of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Environmental Earth Sciences 71 (2): 807–815.Google Scholar
  43. Luan, J., L. Cui, C. Xiang, et al. 2014. Different grazing removal exclosures effects on soil C stocks among alpine ecosystems in east Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Ecological Engineering 64 (3): 262–268.Google Scholar
  44. Mei, H., G. Zhang, X. Gan, et al. 2013. Carbon and nitrogen storage and loss as affected by grassland degradation in Inner Mongolia, China. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment 11 (3): 2071–2076.Google Scholar
  45. Miehe, G., S. Miehe, K. Kaiser, et al. 2009. How old is pastoralism in Tibet? An ecological approach to the making of a Tibetan landscape. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology 276 (1–4): 130–147.Google Scholar
  46. Milinski, M., D. Semmann, and H. Krambeck. 2002. Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’. Nature 415: 424–426.Google Scholar
  47. Moritz, M. 2016. Open property regimes. International Journal of the Commons 10 (2): 688–708.Google Scholar
  48. Niu, K., J. He, and M.J. Lechowicz. 2016. Grazing-induced shifts in community functional composition and soil nutrient availability in Tibetan alpine meadows. Journal of Applied Ecology 53 (5): 1554–1564.Google Scholar
  49. Ohtsuki, H., C. Hauert, and E. Lieberman. 2006. A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks. Nature 441 (7092): 502–505.Google Scholar
  50. Ostrom, E., J. Burger, and C.B. Field. 1999. Revisiting the commons: Local lessons, global challenges. Science 284 (5412): 278–282.Google Scholar
  51. Peacock, B.C., D. Hikuroa, and T. Morgan. 2012. Watershed-scale prioritization of habitat restoration sites for non-point source pollution management. Ecological Engineering 42 (9): 174–182.Google Scholar
  52. Peoples, M.B., J.K. Ladha, and D.F. Herridge. 1995. Enhancing legume N2, fixation through plant and soil management. Plant and Soil 174 (1): 83–101.Google Scholar
  53. Ptackova, J. 2011. Sedentarisation of Tibetan nomads in China: Implementation of the nomadic settlement project in the Tibetan Amdo area; Qinghai and Sichuan Provinces. Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice 1: 4–14.Google Scholar
  54. Rothstein, B. 2000. Trust, social dilemmas and collective memories. Journal of Theoretical Politics 12 (4): 477–501.Google Scholar
  55. Runge, C.F. 1986. Common property and collective action in economic development. World Development 14 (5): 623–635.Google Scholar
  56. Schermer, M., I. Darnhofer, K. Daugstad, et al. 2016. Institutional impacts on the resilience of mountain grasslands: An analysis based on three European case studies. Land Use Policy 52: 382–391.Google Scholar
  57. Schutz, A.B. 2010. Grassland governance and common-interest communities. Sustainability 2 (7): 2320–2348.Google Scholar
  58. Shang, Z.H., J.J. Cao, R.Y. Guo, et al. 2014a. The response of soil organic carbon and nitrogen 10 years after returning cultivated alpine steppe to grassland by abandonment or reseeding. Catena 119: 28–35.Google Scholar
  59. Shang, Z.H., M.J. Gibb, F. Leiber, et al. 2014b. The sustainable development of grassland-livestock systems on the Tibetan Plateau: Problems, strategies and prospects. Rangeland Journal 36 (3): 267–296.Google Scholar
  60. Silveira, M.L., F.M. Rouquette, G.R. Smith, et al. 2014. Soil-fertility principles for warm-season perennial forages and sustainable pasture production. Forage and Grazinglands 12 (1): 1–9.Google Scholar
  61. Sun, Q.L., Z.B. Sun, and T.P. Liu. 2014. The herdsmen’s cognition and behavior about grassland ecological protection—Based on the empirical analysis on 75 villages in Tibet. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment 28 (8): 26–31.Google Scholar
  62. Török, P., N. Hölzel, R.V. Diggelen, et al. 2016. Grazing in European open landscapes: How to reconcile sustainable land management and biodiversity conservation? Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 234: 1–4.Google Scholar
  63. Wang, P., J.P. Lassoie, S.J. Morreale, et al. 2015. A critical review of socioeconomic and natural factors in ecological degradation on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China. The Rangeland Journal 37: 1–9.Google Scholar
  64. Wang, J., Y. Wang, S.C. Li, et al. 2016. Climate adaptation, institutional change, and sustainable livelihoods of herder communities in northern Tibet. Ecology and Society 21 (1): 5–15.Google Scholar
  65. Wu, G.L., G.Z. Du, Z.H. Liu, et al. 2009. Effect of fencing and grazing on a Kobresia-dominated meadow in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Plant and Soil 319 (1): 115–126.Google Scholar
  66. Wu, G.L., D. Wang, Y. Liu, et al. 2017. Warm-season grazing benefits species diversity conservation and topsoil nutrient sequestration in alpine meadow. Land Degradation and Development 28 (4): 1311–1319.Google Scholar
  67. Yang, Y.Y. 2012. The impact studies of Plateau different grazing patterns of grassland degradation. Master’s thesis, Lanzhou University.Google Scholar
  68. Yang, S.R. 2018. Effects of different grazing patterns on soil nutrients and stoichiometric ratios on maqu grassland. Master’s thesis, Northwest Normal University.Google Scholar
  69. Yeh, E.T., and Gaerrang. 2011. Tibetan pastoralism in neoliberalising China: Continuity and change in Gouli. Area 43: 165–172.Google Scholar
  70. Yeh, E.T., L.H. Samberg, Gaerrang, et al. 2017. Pastoralist decision-making on the Tibetan Plateau. Human Ecology 1: 1–11.Google Scholar
  71. Yu, L., and K.N. Farrell. 2013. Individualized pastureland use: Responses of herders to institutional arrangements in pastoral China. Human Ecology 41 (5): 759–771.Google Scholar
  72. ———. 2016. The Chinese perspective on pastoral resource economics: A vision of the future in a context of socio-ecological vulnerability. Revue Scientifique et Technique 35 (2): 523–531. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  73. Yu, L., and J. Yi. 2012. Pastureland governance form a perspective of property right. Practaculture Science 29 (12): 1920–1925.Google Scholar
  74. Zhang, Z., J. Duan, S. Wang, et al. 2012. Effects of land use and management on ecosystem respiration in alpine meadow on the Tibetan Plateau. Soil and Tillage Research 124 (4): 161–169.Google Scholar
  75. Zou, L.N., Z.Y. Zhou, S.Y. Yan, et al. 2009. Response of soil nutrients to different land utilization types in alpine meadow in Maqu. Chinese Journal of Grassland 31: 80–87.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jianjun Cao
    • 1
    Email author
  • Xueyun Xu
    • 1
  • Shurong Yang
    • 1
  • Mengtian Li
    • 1
  • Yifan Gong
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Geography and Environmental ScienceNorthwest Normal UniversityLanzhouChina

Personalised recommendations