Advertisement

Well-Being at Work: Applying Dynamics of Affect in Positive Psychological Interventions

  • Joanna SosnowskaEmail author
  • Yannick Griep
Chapter

Abstract

Recently, there have been repeated calls in the affect literature to acknowledge the dynamic nature of affective experiences. In order to understand how daily fluctuations of affect impact employee well-being at work, scholars have proposed to focus on several dynamic elements of affect such as self-regulating forces, or the extent to which we experience different emotional states. So far, the dynamic elements of affect have been examined in relation to various well-being outcomes at work such as burnout and work engagement. Whereas this dynamic and integrative approach to affect has sparked novel research, one of the major challenges pertains to the practical use of the dynamic properties of affect in the workplace. In this chapter, we address this issue by focusing on how dynamic properties of affect can be applied in positive psychological interventions with the aim of improving employee well-being at work. First, this chapter focuses on the existing dynamic concepts of affective experiences. Second, the existing literature on affect dynamics and well-being at work, and how the current knowledge can be used when creating positive well-being interventions at work are analysed. Third, the chapter offers practical solutions for organizations and employers wanting to improve employees’ working experience, as well as recommendations that can be directly engaged in by employees. Altogether, by explaining how the current knowledge on dynamics of affect can be used in positive psychological interventions, the present chapter contributes to better understanding of how to improve employees’ well-being at work.

Keywords

Well-being Affect Dynamics Practical implications 

References

  1. Baird, B. M., Le, K., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). On the nature of intraindividual personality variability: Reliability, validity, and associations with well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(3), 512–527.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.512.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., & Taris, T. W. (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress, 22(3), 187–200.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370802393649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), 209–223.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430810870476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beal, D. J., & Ghandour, L. (2011). Stability, change, and the stability of change in daily workplace affect. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(4), 526–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beal, D. J., Trougakos, J. P., Weiss, H. M., & Dalal, R. S. (2013). Affect spin and the emotion regulation process at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(4), 593–605.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032559.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Berg, J. M., Dutton, J. E., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2008). What is job crafting and why does it matter. Retrieved form the website of Positive Organizational Scholarship on April 15, 2011.Google Scholar
  7. Bledow, R., Schmitt, A., Frese, M., & Kühnel, J. (2011). The affective shift model of work engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6), 1246–1257.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024532.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bolier, L., Haverman, M., Westerhof, G. J., Riper, H., Smit, F., & Bohlmeijer, E. (2013). Positive psychology interventions: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Public Health, 13(1), 119.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-119.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Breevaart, K., Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2014). Daily self-management and employee work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84(1), 31–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.11.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carter, J. T. (2009). Managers empowering employees. American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 1(2), 39–44.  https://doi.org/10.3844/.2009.41.46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Catterson, A. D., Eldesouky, L., & John, O. P. (2017). An experience sampling approach to emotion regulation: Situational suppression use and social hierarchy. Journal of Research in Personality, 69, 33–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.04.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cavanagh, K., Strauss, C., Cicconi, F., Griffiths, N., Wyper, A., & Jones, F. (2013). A randomised controlled trial of a brief online mindfulness-based intervention. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 51(9), 573–578.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2013.06.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Chow, S. M., Ram, N., Boker, S. M., Fujita, F., & Clore, G. (2005). Emotion as a thermostat: Representing emotion regulation using a damped oscillator model. Emotion, 5(2), 208–225.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.5.2.208.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (2014). Validity and reliability of the experience- sampling method. In Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (pp. 35–54). Netherlands: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_3.Google Scholar
  15. Eger, R. J., & Maridal, J. H. (2015). A statistical meta-analysis of the wellbeing literature. International Journal of Wellbeing, 5(2), 45–74.  https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v5i2.4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fajkowska, M. (2015). The complex-system approach to personality: Main theoretical assumptions. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 15–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Feicht, T., Wittmann, M., Jose, G., Mock, A., von Hirschhausen, E., & Esch, T. (2013). Evaluation of a seven-week web-based happiness training to improve psychological well-being, reduce stress, and enhance mindfulness and flourishing: A randomized controlled occupational health study. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 67695.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/676953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fisher, C. D. (2010). Happiness at work. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4, 84–412.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00270.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 300–319.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Fredrickson, B. L., & Losada, M. F. (2005). Positive affect and the complex dynamics of human flourishing. American Psychologist, 60(7), 678–686.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.7.678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grandey, A. A. (2000). Emotional regulation in the workplace: A new way to conceptualize emotional labor. Journal of occupational health psychology, 5(1), 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grandey, A. A. (2003). When “the show must go on”: Surface acting and deep acting as determinants of emotional exhaustion and peer-rated service delivery. Academy of Management Journal, 46(1), 86–96.  https://doi.org/10.5465/30040678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39(3), 281–291.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0048577201393198.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348–362.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Keyes, C. L. (2003). Well-being in the workplace and its relationship to business outcomes: A review of the Gallup studies. In C. L. M. Keyes & J. Haidt (Eds.), Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life well-lived (pp. 205–224). Washington, DC: APA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Houben, M., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Kuppens, P. (2015). The relation between short-term emotion dynamics and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 141(4), 901–930.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038822.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ivtzan, I., & Lomas, T. (2016). Mindfulness in positive psychology: The science of meditation and wellbeing. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Johnson, S. L., & Nowak, A. (2002). Dynamical patterns in bipolar depression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(4), 380–387.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0604_12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Koole, S. L. (2008). The psychology of emotion regulation: An integrative review, Cognition and Emotion23(1), 4–41.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930802619031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kuppens, P., Van Mechelen, I., Nezlek, J. B., Dossche, D., & Timmermans, T. (2007). Individual differences in core affect variability and their relationship to personality and psychological adjustment. Emotion, 7(2), 262–274.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.262.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kuppens, P., Allen, N. B., & Sheeber, L. B. (2010a). Emotional inertia and psychological maladjustment. Psychological Science, 21(7), 984–991.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610372634.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Kuppens, P., Oravecz, Z., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2010b). Feelings change: Accounting for individual differences in the temporal dynamics of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(6), 1042–1106.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020962.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803–855.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Marek, T., Schaufeli, W. B., & Maslach, C. (2017). Professional burnout: Recent developments in theory and research. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., Leiter, M. P., Schaufeli, W. B., & Schwab, R. L. (1986). Maslach burnout inventory (Vol. 21, pp. 3463–3464). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  37. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102(2), 246–268.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.102.2.246.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Moskowitz, D. S., & Zuroff, D. C. (2004). Flux, pulse, and spin: Dynamic additions to the personality lexicon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(6), 880–893.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.880.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Ouweneel, E., Le Blanc, P. M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2012). Don’t leave your heart at home. Career Development International, 17, 537–556.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13620431211280123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110, 145–172.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.11.1.145.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Schaufeli, W. B., & Maslach, C. (2017). Historical and conceptual development of burnout. In Professional burnout (pp. 1–16). Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Sin, N. L., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2009). Enhancing well-being and alleviating depressive symptoms with positive psychology interventions: A practice-friendly meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65(5), 467–487.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20593.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Sosnowska, J., Hofmans, J., & De Fruyt, F. (2017). Relating emotional arousal to work vigour: A dynamic systems perspective. Personality and Individual Differences.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stander, M. W., & Rothmann, S. (2010). Psychological empowerment, job insecurity and employee engagement. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 36(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
  45. Taris, T. W., & Schaufeli, W. (2015). Individual well-being and performance at work: A conceptual and theoretical overview. In M. Van Veldhoven & R. Peccei (Eds.), Well- being and performance at work: The role of context (pp. 15–34). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  46. Thagard, P., & Nerb, J. (2002). Emotional gestalts: Appraisal, change, and the dynamics of affect. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(4), 274–282.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0604_02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Timmermans, T., Van Mechelen, I., & Kuppens, P. (2010). The relationship between individual differences in intraindividual variability in core affect and interpersonal behaviour. European Journal of Personality, 24(8), 623–638.  https://doi.org/10.1002/per.756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tuckey, M. R., Bakker, A. B., & Dollard, M. F. (2012). Empowering leaders optimize working conditions for engagement: A multilevel study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(1), 15–27.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025942.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Van Dierendonck, D., Garssen, B., & Visser, A. (2005). Burnout prevention through personal growth. International Journal of Stress Management, 12(1), 62–77.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1072-5245.12.1.62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Verduyn, P., Delvaux, E., Van Coillie, H., Tuerlinckx, F., & Van Mechelen, I. (2009). Predicting the duration of emotional experience: Two experience sampling studies. Emotion, 9(1), 83–91.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014610.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Witherington, D. C., & Crichton, J. A. (2007). Frameworks for understanding emotions and their development: Functionalist and dynamic systems approaches. Emotion, 7, 628–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Youssef, C. M., & Luthans, F. (2007). Positive organizational behavior in the workplace: The impact of hope, optimism, and resilience. Journal of Management, 33(5), 774–800.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307305562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zautra, A. J., Affleck, G. G., Tennen, H., Reich, J. W., & Davis, M. C. (2005). Dynamic approaches to emotions and stress in everyday life: Bolger and Zuckerman reloaded with positive as well as negative affects. Journal of Personality, 73(6), 1511–1538.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2005.00357.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyVrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  3. 3.Division of EpidemiologyStress Research Institute, Stockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations