Advertisement

Moving Forward in Fostering Humour: Towards Training Lighter Forms of Humour in Multicultural Contexts

  • Jennifer HofmannEmail author
  • Willibald Ruch
Chapter

Abstract

The following theoretical position paper has the aim to outline two important future directions of humour intervention research. Firstly, existing humour trainings have not differentiated explicitly between different uses of humour or humour that may be virtuous or not. Within the realm of Positive Psychology, all virtuous forms of humour need to be identified and interventions developed that aim at fostering these benevolent/lighter forms. Secondly, most humour trainings have been adapted and conducted in one cultural context. Future trainings should consider cross-cultural perspectives to allow for comparative research and practice. Thus, the current paper first gives an overview on the extant literature on the distinction between lighter and darker forms of humour, as well as showing how humour can serve the virtues proposed by Peterson and Seligman (2004). Then, we elaborate on the findings on humour and well-being, as well as findings on existing humour interventions. The second section starts with open questions and hypotheses on how a new generation of trainings targeting lighter forms of humour could look like. Then, we discuss (potential) cultural differences in humour and how this may affect the design of interventions. When aiming for cross-cultural adaptations of the same humour program, several challenges have to be overcome, such as the term “humour” not having the same meaning in every culture, and cultural rules on what can be laughed at.

Keywords

Benevolent humour Intervention Laughter Positive emotion Sense of humour Training Well-being 

References

  1. Andress, W. C., Hoshino, M., & Rorke, S. C. (2010, July). Empirical evidence for therapeutic laughter courses on a university campus. Paper presented at the 35th Annual National Wellness Conference, Stevens Point, WI.Google Scholar
  2. Beermann, U., & Ruch, W. (2009a). How virtuous is humor? What we can learn from current instruments. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 528–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beermann, U., & Ruch, W. (2009b). How virtuous is humor? Evidence from everyday behavior. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 22, 395–417.Google Scholar
  4. Beh-Pajooh, A., Jahangiri, M., & Zahrakar, K. (2010). Humor skills training and reducing depression in patients with spinal chord injury. Journal of Iranian Psychologists, 6, 227–236.Google Scholar
  5. Craik, K. H., Lampert, M. D., & Nelson, A. J. (1996). Sense of humor and styles of everyday humorous conduct. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 9, 273–302.Google Scholar
  6. Crawford, S., & Caltabiano, N. J. (2011). Promoting emotional well-being through the use of humour. Journal of Positive Psychology, 6, 237–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davies, C. (1990). Ethnic humor around the world: A comparative analysis. Indiana: University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Eysenck, H. J. (1944). National differences in “sense of humor”: Three experimental and statistical studies. Character & Personality, A Quarterly for Psychodiagnostic & Allied Studies, 13, 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Falkenberg, I., Buchkremer, G., Bartels, M., & Wild, B. (2011). Implementation of a manual-based training of humor abilities in patients with depression: A pilot study. Psychiatry Research, 186, 454–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferguson, M. A., & Ford, T. E. (2008). Disparagement humour: A theoretical and empirical review of psychoanalytic, superiority, and social identity theories. Humour: International Journal of Humour Research, 21, 283–312.  https://doi.org/10.1515/humour.2008.014.
  11. Gander, F., Proyer, R. T., Ruch, W., & Wyss, T. (2013). Strength-based positive interventions: Further evidence for their potential in enhancing well-being and alleviating depression. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 1241–1259.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9380-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Glenn, P. (2003). Laughter in interaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heintz, S. & Ruch, W. (2019). From four to nine styles: An update on individual differences in humor. Personality and Individual Differences, 141, 7–12.Google Scholar
  14. Hirsch, R. D., Junglas, K., Konradt, B., & Jonitz, M. F. (2010). Humortherapie bei alten Menschen mit einer Depression. Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung [Humor therapy in the depressed elderly. Results of an empirical study]. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 43, 42–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hobbes, T. (2010). Leviathan. In I. Shapiro (Ed.), Leviathan. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press (original work published in 1651).Google Scholar
  16. Hofmann, J. (2018). Putting “Laughing at yourself” to the test. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, Special Issue Festschrift for Paul McGhee: Humor Across the Lifespan, Theory, Measurement, and Applications, 273–286.  https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2016-0075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hofmann, J., Heintz, S., Pang, D., & Ruch, W. (2019). Differential relationships of light and darker forms of humor with mindfulness. Applied Research in Quality of Life, Special Issue “Character Strengths, Well-Being, and Health in Educational and Vocational Settings”. Advance Online Publication.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-018-9698-9.
  18. Hofmann, J., Platt, T., & Ruch, W. (2017). Laughter and smiling in 16 positive emotions. IEEE Transactions in Affective Computing, Special Issue on Laughter, 8, 495–507.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2017.2737000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Konradt, B., Hirsch, R. D., Jonitz, M. F., & Junglas, K. (2013). Evaluation of a standardized humor group in a clinical setting: A feasibility study for older patients with depression. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 28(8), 850–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Martin, G. N., & Sullivan, E. (2013). Sense of humor across cultures: A comparison of British, Australian and American respondents. North American Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 375–384.Google Scholar
  21. Martin, R. A. (2007). The psychology of humour: An integrative approach. London, UK: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  22. Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir, K. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humour and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the humour styles questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 48–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00534-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McGhee, P. E. (1996). Health, healing and the amuse system: Humor as survival training. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.Google Scholar
  24. McGhee, P. E. (2010). Humor as survival training for a stressed-out world: The 7 humor habits program. Bloomington, IN: Author House.Google Scholar
  25. Mendiburo-Seguel, A., Páez, D., & Martínez-Sánchez, F. (2015). Humor styles and personality: A meta-analysis of the relation between humor styles and the big five personality traits. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 56(3), 335–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mesmer-Magnus, J., Glew, D. J., & Viswesvaran, C. (2012). A meta-analysis of positive humour in the workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(2), 155–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Morreall, J. (2010). Comic vices and comic virtues. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 23, 1–26.  https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2010.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Müller, L., & Ruch, W. (2011). Humor and strengths of character. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6, 368–376.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2011.592508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Niemiec, R. M. (2013). Mindfulness and character strengths. Boston: Hogrefe Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. Niemiec, R. M. (2017). Character strengths interventions: A field guide for practitioners. Boston: Hogrefe Publishing.Google Scholar
  31. Papousek, I., Ruch, W., Rominger, C., Kindermann, E., Scheidl, K., Schulter, G., … Weiss, E. M. (2017). The use of bright and dark types of humour is rooted in the brain. Scientific Reports, 7, 42967.Google Scholar
  32. Papousek, I., & Schulter, G. (2008). Effects of a mood enhancing intervention on subjective well-being and cardiovascular parameters. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15, 293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Parks, A. C., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2013). Positive intervention: Past, present, future. In T. B. Kashdan & J. Ciarrochi (Eds.), Mindfulness, acceptance, and positive psychology: The seven foundations for wellbeing (pp. 140–165). Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.Google Scholar
  34. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Proyer, R. T., Ruch, W., & Buschor, C. (2013). Testing strengths-based interventions: A preliminary study on the effectiveness of a program targeting curiosity, gratitude, hope, humor, and zest for enhancing life satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(1), 275–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rawlings, M., & Findlay, B. (2016). The development and validation of the Humor at Work (HAW) scale. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research.  https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2015-0097.
  37. Roeckelein, J. E. (2002). The psychology of humour: A reference guide and annotated bibliography. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  38. Ruch, W. (2001). The perception of humour. In A. W. Kaszniak (Ed.), Emotion, qualia, and consciousness (pp. 410–425). Tokyo, Japan: Word Scientific Publisher.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ruch, W. (2004). Humor. In C. P. Peterson & M. E. P. Seligman (Eds.), Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification (pp. 583–598). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  40. Ruch, W. (2012). Towards a new structural model of the sense of humor: Preliminary findings. Technical reports of the AAAI.Google Scholar
  41. Ruch, W., & Forabosco, G. (1996). A cross-cultural study of humor appreciation: Italy and Germany. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 9(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
  42. Ruch, W., & Heintz, S. (2016). The virtue gap in humour: Exploring benevolent and corrective humour. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 2(1), 35–45.  https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ruch, W., & Heintz, S. (2017). Experimentally manipulating items informs on the (limited) construct and criterion validity of the humor styles questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ruch, W., & Heintz, S. (in press). On the dimensionality of humorous conduct and their association with humor traits and behaviors. HUMOR—International Journal of Humor Research.Google Scholar
  45. Ruch, W., Heintz, S., Platt, T., Wagner, L., & Proyer, R. T. (2018). Broadening humour: Comic styles differentially tap into temperament, character, and ability. Frontiers in Psychology: Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 6.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ruch, W., & Hofmann, J. (2012). A temperament approach to humour. In P. Gremigni (Ed.), Humour and health promotion (pp. 79–113). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  47. Ruch, W., & Hofmann, J. (2017). Fostering humour. In C. Proctor (Ed.), Positive psychology interventions in practice (pp. 65–80). New York, NY: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51787-2_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ruch, W., Hofmann, J., Platt, T., & Proyer, R. T. (2014). The state-of-the art in gelotophobia research: A review and some theoretical extensions. Humour: International Journal of Humour Research, 27, 23–45.  https://doi.org/10.1515/humour-2013-0046.
  49. Ruch, W., Hofmann, J., Rusch, S., & Stolz, H. (2018). The impact of the 7 Humor Habits Program on the sense of humor and satisfaction with life. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, Festschrift for Paul McGhee: Humor Across the Lifespan, Theory, Measurement, and Applications.  https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2017-0099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ruch, W., & Proyer, R. T. (2015). Mapping strengths into virtues: The relation of the 24 VIA-strengths to six ubiquitous virtues. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 460.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00460.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Ruch, W., Wagner, L., & Heintz, S. (2018). Humour, the PEN model of personality, and subjective well-being: Support for differential relationships with eight comic styles. Rivista Italiana di Studi sull’Umorismo, 1(1), 31–43. Retrieved from www.risu.biz.
  52. Rugenstein, K. (2014). Humor: Die Verflüssigung des Subjekts bei Hippokrates, Jean Paul, Kierkegaard und Freud. Paderborn: Fink.Google Scholar
  53. Sassenrath, S. (2001). Humor und Lachen als Stressbewältigungsstrategie [Humor and laughter as coping mechanism] (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
  54. Schmidt-Hidding, W. (1963). Europäische Schlüsselwörter: Humour und Witz (Band I) [European keywords: Humour and wit (Vol. 1)]. Munich, Germany: Huber.Google Scholar
  55. Schutte, N. S., & Malouff, J. M. (2018). The impact of signature character strengths interventions: A meta-analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1–18. Advance online publication.Google Scholar
  56. Seligman, M. E., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60(5), 410–421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.5.410.
  57. Wellenzohn, S., Proyer, R. T., & Ruch, W. (2015, accepted for publication). Humor-based online positive psychology interventions: A randomized placebo-controlled long-term trial. Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(6), 584–594.Google Scholar
  58. Wellenzohn, S., Proyer, R. T., & Ruch, W. (2016a). Who profits from humor-based positive psychology interventions? The moderating effects of personality traits and sense of humor. Frontiers in Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00821.
  59. Wellenzohn, S., Proyer, R. T., & Ruch, W. (2016b). How do positive psychology interventions work? A short-term placebo-controlled humor-based study on the role of the time focus. Personality and Individual Differences, 96, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Section on Personality Psychology and AssessmentUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations