Advertisement

About Expertise Problems: Decision Making Challenges in a Contentious Environment

  • Myriam Merad
  • Benjamin D. Trump
Chapter
Part of the Risk, Systems and Decisions book series (RSD)

Abstract

Humans do not like dealing with problems. Though some may revel in times of chaos and doubt, the average person is plenty satisfied when their problems seem far away, and daily life remains ordinary and predictable. Problems are the embodiment of unpredictability, and such unpredictability threatens trouble that could generate an untold array of harmful consequences. Such consequences could be minor (i.e., taking an alternate route to work that happens to experience significant traffic on that day) to life-altering (i.e., critically inaccurate medical diagnoses). Thankfully, the human mind is tailored to be a problem-solving machine and uses various tricks and shortcuts to demystify uncertainty, identify patterns, and derive the optimal solution for the given problem at hand. This ‘brain-as-problem-solving-device’ concept is honed throughout one’s educational experience, where schools use ‘problems’ as teaching moments for students to derive a solution via a mixture of deductive and inductive reasoning and fact retention.

References

  1. Collier, Z. A., Trump, B. D., Wood, M. D., Chobanova, R., & Linkov, I. (2016). Leveraging stakeholder knowledge in the innovation decision making process. International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management, 6(3), 163–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Florin, M. V., & Trump, B. D. (2018). Resilience in the context of systemic risks: Perspectives from IRGC’s guidelines for the governance of systemic risks. Domains of resilience for complex interconnected systems (p. 60).Google Scholar
  3. IRGC. (2018). Guidelines for the governance of systemic risks. ETH Zurich.Google Scholar
  4. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of business, 59(4), 251–278.Google Scholar
  5. Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty, and profit (Vol. 273). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Linkov, I., & Trump, B. D. (2019). The science and practice of resilience. Springer International Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Linkov, I., Rosoff, H., Valverde, L. J., Bates, M. E., Trump, B., Friedman, D., et al. (2012). Civilian response corps force review: The application of multi-criteria decision analysis to prioritize skills required for future diplomatic missions. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 19(3–4), 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Linkov, I., Trump, B. D., & Fox-Lent, C. (2016). Resilience: Approaches to risk analysis and governance. An edited collection of authored pieces comparing, contrasting, and integrating risk and resilience with an emphasis on ways to measure resilience (p. 6).Google Scholar
  9. Linkov, I., Trump, B. D., & Keisler, J. (2018). Risk and resilience must be independently managed. Nature, 555(7694), 30–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Malloy, T., Trump, B. D., & Linkov, I. (2016). Risk-based and prevention-based governance for emerging materials. Environmental Science & Technology.Google Scholar
  11. Palma-Oliveira, J. M., & Trump, B. D. (2016). Modern resilience: Moving without movement. An edited collection of authored pieces comparing, contrasting, and integrating risk and resilience with an emphasis on ways to measure resilience (p. 173).Google Scholar
  12. Palma-Oliveira, J. M., Trump, B. D., Wood, M. D., & Linkov, I. (2018). Community-driven hypothesis testing: A solution for the tragedy of the anticommons. Risk Analysis, 38(3), 620–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Trump, B. D., Poinsatte-Jones, K., Elran, M., Allen, C., Srdjevic, B., Merad, M., et al. (2017). Social resilience and critical infrastructure systems. In Resilience and risk (pp. 289–299). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Trump, B. D., Cegan, J. C., Wells, E., Keisler, J., & Linkov, I. (2018). A critical juncture for synthetic biology: Lessons from nanotechnology could inform public discourse and further development of synthetic biology. EMBO Reports, 19(7), e46153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ulanowicz, R. E., Goerner, S. J., Lietaer, B., & Gome, R. (2009). Quantifying sustainability: Resilience, efficiency and the return of information theory. Ecological Complexity, 6(1), 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Myriam Merad
    • 1
  • Benjamin D. Trump
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUMR ESPACEParisFrance
  2. 2.US Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development CenterConcordUSA

Personalised recommendations