Advertisement

Evaluation of Suitable Rest Times for the Use of Optical Head-Mounted Displays

  • Chih-Yu HsiaoEmail author
  • Yi-An Liu
  • Mao-Jiun Wang
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 973)

Abstract

This study aimed to determine suitable rest times for visual tasks of different lengths by evaluating visual fatigue and visually induced motion sickness while 20 healthy participants were using an optical head-mounted display. The independent variables tested were participant gender, visual task condition (30 min and 60 min), and length of rest time (5 min, 10 min, and 15 min). The critical fusion frequency (CFF) value and simulator sickness questionnaire (SSQ) scores were used as dependent measures. Gender showed no significant effect on CFF values or SSQ scores. Greater CFF values and SSQ scores were produced by the 60-min visual task than the 30-min visual task. The results of this study suggest that after completing a 30-min visual task, a rest time of at least 10 min is necessary for participants to recover, and a rest time of more than 15 min needs to follow a 60-min visual task.

Keywords

Optical head-mounted display Visual fatigue Visually induced motion sickness Critical fusion frequency Simulator sickness questionnaire 

References

  1. 1.
    Hsiao, C.Y., Wang, M.J., Lu, Y.T., Chang, C.C.: Usability evaluation of monocular optical head-mounted displays on reading tasks. J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput., 1–10 (2018)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hua, H., Javidi, B.: A 3D integral imaging optical see-through head-mounted display. Opt. Express 22(11), 13484–13491 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wu, T.S., Dameff, C.J., Tully, J.L.: Ultrasound-guided central venous access using Google Glass. J. Emerg. Med. 47(6), 668–675 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Robertson, T., Bischof, J., Geyman, M., Lise, E.: Reducing maintenance error with wearable technology. In: 2018 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS), pp. 1–6. IEEE Press (2018)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shibata, T., Kim, J., Hoffman, D. M., Banks, M. S.: Visual discomfort with stereo displays: effects of viewing distance and direction of vergence-accommodation conflict. In: Woods, A.J., Holliman, N.S., Dodgson, N.A. (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Stereoscopic Displays and Applications XXII, vol. 7863, pp. 1–9 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ukai, K., Howarth, P.A.: Visual fatigue caused by viewing stereoscopic motion images: background, theories, and observations. Displays 29(2), 106–116 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Du, X., Arya, A.: Design and evaluation of a learning assistant system with optical head-mounted display (OHMD). In: Learning and Collaboration Technologies, pp. 75–86 (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stanney, K.M., Hale, K.S., Nahmens, I., Kennedy, R.S.: What to expect from immersive virtual environment exposure: influences of gender, body mass index, and past experience. Hum. Factors 45(3), 504–520 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kennedy, R.S., Drexler, J., Kennedy, R.C.: Research in visually induced motion sickness. Appl. Ergon. 41(4), 494–503 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ukai, K., Kibe, A.: Counterroll torsional eye movement in users of head-mounted displays. Displays 24(2), 59–63 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moss, J.D., Muth, E.R.: Characteristics of head-mounted displays and their effects on simulator sickness. Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 53(3), 308–319 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chi, C.F., Lin, F.T.: A comparison of seven visual fatigue assessment techniques in three data-acquisition VDT tasks. Hum. Factors 40(4), 577–590 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kang, Y.Y., Wang, M.J.J., Lin, R.: Usability evaluation of e-books. Displays 30(2), 49–52 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kennedy, R.S., Lane, N.E., Berbaum, K.S., Lilienthal, M.G.: Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 3(3), 203–220 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gunnarsson, E., Söderberg, I.: Eye strain resulting from VDT work at the Swedish telecommunications administration. Appl. Ergon. 14(1), 61–69 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wu, H.C.: Visual fatigue and performances for the 40-min. mixed visual work with a projected screen. Ergon. Open J. 5, 10–18 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Häkkinen, J., Vuori, T., Paakka, M.: Postural stability and sickness symptoms after HMD use. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pp. 147–152 (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering ManagementNational Tsing Hua UniversityHsinchuTaiwan, R.O.C.
  2. 2.Department of Industrial Engineering and Enterprise InformationTunghai UniversityTaichungTaiwan, R.O.C.

Personalised recommendations