Advertisement

Appreciation of Proportion in Architecture: A Comparison Between Facades Primed in Virtual Reality and on Paper

  • Stijn VerwulgenEmail author
  • Sander Van Goethem
  • Gustaaf Cornelis
  • Jouke Verlinden
  • Tom Coppens
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 973)

Abstract

Virtual reality (VR) is a rapidly emerging tool in design and architecture. VR allows to define and evaluate design equations at full scale providing the user a sense of depth, volume and distances, as opposed to drawings, plans and CAD designs displayed on screen. Currently, VR enables to provide subjects with a preliminary experience of their own body and relative position towards the virtually designed space. That real time virtual body experience is expected to become more realistic the forthcoming decade, given the uprising of motion tracking and posture generating algorithms, and the expected breakthrough of augmented reality. These evolutions will make VR a tool that is complementary to design and simulation of body near products with 3D anthropometry and rapid prototyping such as 3D printing. Whereas the latter allows simulation of interaction with artifacts at scale of the human body or smaller, VR will enable to simulate and evaluate structures that surrounds the human body: rooms, spaces, buildings and urban implants. In particular, evaluation of scale with relation to human proportion is expected to benefit from VR. The present research is a first step in comparing classical drawing techniques with VR. This paper is confined to evaluate the aesthetic preference of subjects when exposed to facades in a virtual urban planning environment. The preference for a certain proportion is evaluated by exposing subjects to the same facades in both mediums. In this first pilot study, we isolated one variable: the length to width ratio of windows in the facade of a house with a flat roof. Subjects were primed with three length to width ratios: the square root of 2, the golden (in approximation 1.618) section and a value that was intuitively designed to be most pleasing, turned out to be 1.80. A total of n = 30 subjects were enrolled in this study. Only descriptive statistics were used due to small sample size. Results were interpreted as tendencies. There were no differences found in preferences when exposed to drawings compared to when exposed to the same models in VR. These results indicate that-restricted to our simple and controlled setting- evaluation in VR coincides with regular evaluation techniques, and thus could extend the latter, not only to relative proportion, but also in relation to subject’s body dimensions as a sense of absolute scale. The test setting presented in this pilot can be used to plan large scale-controlled studies to further investigate this hypothesis.

Keywords

Virtual reality Proportion Facade Paper image 

References

  1. 1.
    Steuer, J.: Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence. J. Commun. 42, 73–93 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bryson, S.: Approaches to the successful design and implementation of VR applications. Virtual Real. Appl. 3–15 (1995)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wexelblat, A.: Virtual Reality: Applications and Explorations. Academic Press (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim, S.L., Suk, H.J., Kang, J.H., Jung, J.M., Laine, T.H., Westlin, J.: Using unity 3D to facilitate mobile augmented reality game development. In: 2014 IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), 2014, pp. 21–26Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ahearn, L.: 3D Game Textures: Create Professional Game Art Using Photoshop. CRC Press (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cowan, B., Kapralos, B.: An overview of serious game engines and frameworks. In: Recent Advances in Technologies for Inclusive Well-Being, pp. 15–38. Springer, Cham (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Verwulgen, S., Cornelis, G.: Universele esthetiek! De gulden snede? Over zin en onzin omtrent een merkwaardig getal. Academic and Scientific Publishers, Antwerp (2018)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Livio, M.: The Golden Ratio: The Story of Phi, The World’s Most Astonishing Number. Broadway Books (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Green, C.D.: All that glitters: a review of psychological research on the aesthetics of the golden section. Perception 24, 937–968 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Witmer, B.G., Singer, M.J.: Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence 7, 225–240 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Foreman, N.: Virtual reality in psychology. Themes Sci. Technol. Educ. 2, 225–252 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stijn Verwulgen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sander Van Goethem
    • 1
  • Gustaaf Cornelis
    • 1
  • Jouke Verlinden
    • 1
  • Tom Coppens
    • 2
  1. 1.Department Product Development, Faculty of Design SciencesUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpenBelgium
  2. 2.Department Architecture Interior Architecture and Urban Planning, Faculty of Design SciencesUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpenBelgium

Personalised recommendations