Advertisement

Current Situation and Problems of Hand-Transmitted Vibration Measurement and Monitoring Equipment and Benefits of Wearable Sensors for Everyday Monitoring

  • Setsuo MaedaEmail author
  • Leif AndersonEmail author
  • Jacqui Mclaughlin
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 973)

Abstract

Employers who expose their workforce to hazardous vibration from mechanized tools need to develop an understanding of the health risk their employees face as a consequence. ISO 5349-2 was developed as an international standard to define how vibration exposure should be measured to quantify the risk to the individual. The authors would contend that the standard does not facilitate the economic collection of data across a range of tool users on a routine basis. In this paper, the Current Situation of Monitoring equipment for Hand-Transmitted Vibration Measurement is summarized with a review of the equipment’s functionality. The paper then examines evidence from a time in motion study of a group of skilled operators repeatedly performing a single task to highlight the broad variability in monitored exposure levels relative to that expected. The authors conclude with the benefits the wearable sensor offers as a practical everyday assessment relative to existing methodologies.

Keywords

Wearable sensor Hand-transmitted vibration HAVS ISO 5349 Regular monitoring Exposure data analytics 

References

  1. 1.
    Advances in Human Factors in Wearable Technologies and Game Design, Proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conferences on Human Factors and Wearable Technologies, and Human Factors in Game Design and Virtual Environments. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-94619-1
  2. 2.
    Bovenzi, M.: Exposure-response relationship in the hand-arm vibration syndrome: an overview of current epidemiology research. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health. 71(8), 509–519 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    UK Health and Safety ExecutiveGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pitts, P.M., Kaulbars U.: Consideration of standardization requirements for “vibration dosemeters”. VDI-Berichte Nr. 2190 (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    BS EN ISO 5349-1:2001 Measurement and evaluation of human exposure to hand-transmitted vibrationGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mueller, W., Cowie, H., Groat, S., Graveling, R.: Report 606-02372-03, Review of Data Measured by Reactec HAVwear, Institute of Occupational Medicine, Research Avenue North, Riccarton, Edinburgh EH14 4AP, UKGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maeda, S., Taylor, M.D., Anderson, L.C., McLaughlin, J.: Determination of hand-transmitted vibration risk on the human. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 70, 28–37 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Anderson, L.C., Buckingham, M.-P.: Investigating the utility of wrist worn vibration monitoring in the effective management of exposure to dangerous vibrations within the work place. Reactec Ltd 290–135 (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    HSE L140: The Control of Vibration at Work Regulations 2005, UK Health and Safety ExecutiveGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Applied SociologyKindai UniversityHigashi-Osaka CityJapan
  2. 2.Reactec Ltd.EdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations