Advertisement

Comparative User Experience Analysis of Pervasive Wearable Technology

  • Nicholas CaporussoEmail author
  • Angela Walters
  • Meng Ding
  • Devon Patchin
  • Noah Vaughn
  • Daniel Jachetta
  • Spencer Romeiser
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 973)

Abstract

Although the growing market of wearable devices primarily consists of smartwatches, fitness bands, and connected gadgets, its long tail includes a variety of diverse technologies based on novel types of input and interaction paradigms, such as gaze, brain signals, and gestures. As the offer of innovative wearable devices will increase, users will be presented with more sophisticated alternatives: among the several factors that influence product adoption, perceived user experience has a significant role. In this paper, we focus on human factors dynamics involved in the pre- and post-adoption phase, that is, before and after customers buy or use products. Specifically, objective of our research is to evaluate aspects that influence the perceived value of particularly innovative products and lead to purchasing them. To this end, we present the results of a pilot study that compared performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions, in the pre- and post-adoption stages of three types of wearable technology, i.e., brain-computer interface, gesture controllers, and eye-tracking systems.

Keywords

Technology acceptance model Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Performance expectancy Effort expectancy Social influence Eye tracking Gaze tracking Gesture controllers Brain-computer interface 

References

  1. 1.
    Antin, A., Atwal, R., Nguyen, T.: Forecast: Wearable Electronic Devices, Worldwide, 2018. Gartner (2018). https://www.gartner.com/doc/3891988/forecast-wearable-electronic-devices-worldwide
  2. 2.
    Venkatesh, V., Zhang, X.: Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: US vs. China. J. Glob. Inf. Technol. Manag. 13(1), 5–27 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hassenzahl, M.: The thing and I: understanding the relationship between user and product. In: Funology 2, pp. 301–313. Springer, Cham (2018)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schifferstein, H.N., Fenko, A., Desmet, P.M., Labbe, D., Martin, N.: Influence of package design on the dynamics of multisensory and emotional food experience. Food Qual. Preference 27(1), 18–25 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nenonen, S., Rasila, H., Junnonen, J.M., Kärnä, S.: Customer Journey–a method to investigate user experience. In: Proceedings of the Euro FM Conference Manchester, pp. 54–63 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Karapanos, E., Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., Martens, J.B.: User experience over time: an initial framework. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 729–738. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fenko, A., Schifferstein, H.N., Hekkert, P.: Shifts in sensory dominance between various stages of user–product interactions. Appl. Ergon. 41(1), 34–40 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hamilton, R.W., Thompson, D.V.: Is there a substitute for direct experience? Comparing consumers’ preferences after direct and indirect product experiences. J. Consumer Res. 34(4), 546–555 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhu, F., Zhang, X.: Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. J. Market. 74(2), 133–148 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Füller, J., Matzler, K.: Virtual product experience and customer participation—A chance for customer-centred, really new products. Technovation 27(6–7), 378–387 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Papagiannidis, S., See-To, E., Bourlakis, M.: Virtual test-driving: the impact of simulated products on purchase intention. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 21(5), 877–887 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rawat, S., Vats, S., Kumar, P.: Evaluating and exploring the MYO ARMBAND. In: 2016 International Conference System Modeling & Advancement in Research Trends (SMART), pp. 115–120. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Caporusso, N., Biasi, L., Cinquepalmi, G., Trotta, G.F., Brunetti, A., Bevilacqua, V.: A wearable device supporting multiple touch-and gesture-based languages for the deaf-blind. In: International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, pp. 32–41. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60639-2_4Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Caporusso, N., Biasi, L., Cinquepalmi, G., Bevilacqua, V.: An immersive environment for experiential training and remote control in hazardous industrial tasks. In: International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, pp. 88–97. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94619-1_9Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sałabun, W.: Processing and spectral analysis of the raw EEG signal from the MindWave. Prz. Elektrotechniczny 90(2), 169–174 (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cincotti, F., Kauhanen, L., Aloise, F., Palomäki, T., Caporusso, N., Jylänki, P., Mattia, D., Babiloni, F., Vanacker, G., Nuttin, M., Marciani, M.G.: Vibrotactile feedback for brain-computer interface operation. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1155/2007/48937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kassner, M., Patera, W., Bulling, A.: Pupil: an open source platform for pervasive eye tracking and mobile gaze-based interaction. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct Publication, pp. 1151–1160. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Caporusso, N., Ding, M., Clarke, M., Carlson, G., Bevilacqua, V., Trotta, G.F.: Analysis of the relationship between content and interaction in the usability design of 360° videos. In: International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, pp. 593–602. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94947-5_60Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Carlson, G., Caporusso, N.: A physically immersive platform for training emergency responders and law enforcement officers. In: International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, pp. 108–116. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93882-0_11Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicholas Caporusso
    • 1
    Email author
  • Angela Walters
    • 1
  • Meng Ding
    • 1
  • Devon Patchin
    • 1
  • Noah Vaughn
    • 1
  • Daniel Jachetta
    • 1
  • Spencer Romeiser
    • 1
  1. 1.Fort Hays State UniversityHaysUSA

Personalised recommendations