Performance and Brain Activity During a Spatial Working Memory Task: Application to Pilot Candidate Selection

  • Mickaël CausseEmail author
  • Zarrin Chua
  • Nadine Matton
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 953)


For 18 ab initio airline pilots, we assessed the possibility of predicting flight simulator performance with the performance and the prefrontal activity measured during a spatial working memory (SWM) task. Behavioral results revealed that a better control of the aircraft altitude in the flight simulator was correlated with better strategy during the SWM task. In addition, neuroimaging results suggested that participants that recruited more neural resources during the SWM task were more likely to accurately control their aircraft. Taken together, our results emphasized that spatial working memory and the underlying neural circuitries are important for piloting. Ultimately, SWM tasks may be included in pilot selection tests as it seems to be a good predictor of flight performance.


Flight performance Cognitive performance Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Pilots selection and training 


  1. 1.
    Wiegmann, D.A., Shappell, S.A.: Human error and crew resource management failures in naval aviation mishaps: a review of U.S. Naval Safety Center data, 1990-96. Aviat. Space Env. Med 70(12), 1147–1151 (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Parasuraman, R.: Neuroergonomics: research and practice. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 4(1), 5–20 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burke, E., Hobson, C., Linsky, C.: Large sample validations of three general predictors of pilot training success. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 7(3), 225–234 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carretta, T.R.: Pilot candidate selection method: still an effective predictor of US air force pilot training performance. Aviat. Psychol. Appl. Hum. Factors 1, 3–8 (2011) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Damos, D.L.: Pilot selection batteries: shortcomings and perspectives. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 6(2), 199–209 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Martinussen, M.: Psychological measures as predictors of pilot performance: a meta-analysis. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 6(1), 1–20 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Causse, M., Dehais, F., Arexis, M., Pastor, J.: Cognitive aging and flight performances in general aviation pilots. Aging Neuropsychol. Cogn. 18(5), 544–561 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Causse, M., Dehais, F., Pastor, J.: Executive functions and pilot characteristics predict flight simulator performance in general aviation pilots. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 21(3), 217–234 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Taylor, J., O’Hara, R., Mumenthaler, M., Yesavage, J.: Relationship of CogScreen-AE to flight simulator performance and pilot age. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 71(4), 373 (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Benthem, K.V., Herdman, C.M.: Cognitive factors mediate the relation between age and flight path maintenance in general aviation. Aviat. Psychol. Appl. Hum. Factors 6, 81–90 (2016). Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang, H., Su, Y., Shang, S., Pei, M., Wang, X., Jin, F.: Working memory: a criterion of potential practicality for pilot candidate selection. Int. J. Aerosp. Psychol. 28, 1–12 (2019)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dror, I.E., Kosslyn, S.M., Waag, W.L.: Visual-spatial abilities of pilots. J. Appl. Psychol. 78(5), 763 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    De Luca, C.R., et al.: Normative data from the Cantab. I: development of executive function over the lifespan. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 25(2), 242–254 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lu, C.-M., Zhang, Y.-J., Biswal, B.B., Zang, Y.-F., Peng, D.-L., Zhu, C.-Z.: Use of fNIRS to assess resting state functional connectivity. J. Neurosci. Methods 186(2), 242–249 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Roche-Labarbe, N., Zaaimi, B., Berquin, P., Nehlig, A., Grebe, R., Wallois, F.: NIRS-measured oxy- and deoxyhemoglobin changes associated with EEG spike-and-wave discharges in children. Epilepsia 49(11), 1871–1880 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    White, B.R., et al.: Resting-state functional connectivity in the human brain revealed with diffuse optical tomography. NeuroImage 47(1), 148–156 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cui, X., Bray, S., Reiss, A.L.: Functional near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) signal improvement based on negative correlation between oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin dynamics. NeuroImage 49(4), 3039–3046 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ayaz, H., Shewokis, P., Bunce, S., Izzetoglu, K., Willems, B., Onaral, B.: Optical brain monitoring for operator training and mental workload assessment. Neuroimage 59(1), 36–47 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Durantin, G., Gagnon, J.-F., Tremblay, S., Dehais, F.: Using near infrared spectroscopy and heart rate variability to detect mental overload. Behav. Brain Res. 259, 16–23 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Foy, H.J., Runham, P., Chapman, P.: Prefrontal cortex activation and young driver behaviour: a fNIRS study. PLoS ONE 11(5), e0156512 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee, A., Archer, J., Wong, C.K.Y., Chen, S.-H.A., Qiu, A.: Age-related decline in associative learning in healthy Chinese adults. PLoS ONE 8(11), e80648 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gateau, T., Durantin, G., Lancelot, F., Scannella, S., Dehais, F.: Real-time state estimation in a flight simulator using fNIRS. PLoS ONE 10(3), e0121279 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mandrick, K., Peysakhovich, V., Rémy, F., Lepron, E., Causse, M.: Neural and psychophysiological correlates of human performance under stress and high mental workload. Biol. Psychol. 121, 62–73 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Takeuchi, Y.: Change in blood volume in the brain during a simulated aircraft landing task. J. Occup. Health 42(2), 60–65 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Causse, M., Chua, Z., Peysakhovich, V., Del Campo, N., Matton, N.: Mental workload and neural efficiency quantified in the prefrontal cortex using fNIRS. Sci. Rep. 7, 5222 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ISAE-SUPAEROUniversité de ToulouseToulouseFrance
  2. 2.ENAC and CLLEUniversité de ToulouseToulouseFrance

Personalised recommendations