Advertisement

Use of Active Test Objects in Security Systems

  • Marina BoronenkoEmail author
  • Yura Boronenko
  • Vladimir Zelenskiy
  • Elizaveta Kiseleva
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 953)

Abstract

Some modern security systems use pupillometry to identify people in a state of drug or alcohol intoxication. Our work is aimed at developing an optoelectronic system to search for people who represent a hidden threat. We propose in security systems to use test objects that are significant only for a certain category of people. Other people will not have a reaction to the test object. Synchronous registration of pupillograms and oculograms allows to determine the deviation of the emotional state from the original. Oculograms specify the detail of the test object to which the reaction occurred. We experienced the idea in the older age group (45–50 years old) under ideal conditions (the pupil is clearly visible). In the future we plan to expand the age range and increase statistics. Experiments have shown that the use of thematic images as test objects allows the pupil to cause a reaction that is greater than that caused by other factors. Synchronization of pupillograms and oculograms indicates the centers of attention and indicates the presence (or absence) of emotional attachment.

Keywords

Pupillogram Oculogram Test object Attention wave 

Notes

Thanks

The study was carried out with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research in the framework of the research project 18-47-860018 р_a.

References

  1. 1.
    Cacioppo, J.T.: Feelings and emotions: role for electrophysioogical markers. Biol. Psychol. 67, 235–243 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stern, R.M., et al.: Psychophysiological Recording. Oxford University Press, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Meyberg, S., et al.: Microsaccade-related brain potentials signal the focus of visuospatial attention. NeuroImage 104, 79–88 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Costela, F.M., et al.: Changes in visibility as a function of spatial frequency and microsaccade occurrence. Eur. J. Neurosci. 45(3), 433–439 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lowet, E., et al.: Microsaccade-rhythmic modulation of neural synchronization and coding within and across cortical areas V1 and V2. PLoS Biol. 16(5), e2004132 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Perotti, L., et al.: Discrete structure of the brain rhythms. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 1105 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Potter, M.C., et al.: Detecting meaning in RSVP at 13 ms per picture. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 76(2), 270–279 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gao, Y., Huber, C., Sabel, B.A.: Stable microsaccades and microsaccade-induced global alpha band phase reset across the life span. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 59(5), 2032–2041 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Partala, T., Surakka, V.: Pupil size variation as an indication of affective processing. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 59(1–2), 185–198 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Steidtmann, D., Ingram, R.E., Siegle, G.J.: Pupil response to negative emotional information in individuals at risk for depression. Cogn. Emot. 24(3), 480–496 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Beatty, J., et al.: The pupillary system. Handb. Psychophysiol. 2, 142–162 (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lanata, A., Armato, A., Valenza, G., Scilingo, E.P.: Eye tracking and pupil size variation as response to affective stimuli: a preliminary study. In: 2011 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth), 78–84. IEEE, Dublin (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Onorati, F., et al.: Characterization of affective states by pupillary dynamics and autonomic correlates. Front. Neuroeng. 6, 9 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    de Gee, J.W., Knapen, T., Donner, T.H.: Decision-related pupil dilation reflects upcoming choice and individual bias. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111(5), E618–E625 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brambilla, R., et al.: A stimulus-response processing framework for pupil dynamics assessment during iso-luminant stimuli. In: 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 400–403. IEEE (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marina Boronenko
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yura Boronenko
    • 1
  • Vladimir Zelenskiy
    • 1
  • Elizaveta Kiseleva
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Complex EngineeringUgra State UniversityKhanty-MansiyskRussia

Personalised recommendations