Advertisement

The Role of Affective Design in Sustainability

  • Guillermo JuarezEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 968)

Abstract

As the changes in global climate become more evident, sustainable design, which is also known as green design, environment-friendly design or eco-design has become a major topic in many of the most recent forums and conferences. Sustainable design is defined by Zande (2010) as “a design philosophy that seeks to maximize the quality of the built environment, while minimizing or eliminating negative impact to the natural environment” [18]. In the field of architecture, the value of sustainability has also been highlighted, as it is considered a useful tool that can help to overcome the challenges of sustainable development. Nevertheless, it is common to associate this concept with sacrifice when addressed in practice, as stated by Fiore, Phillips and Sellers (2014) “society is asked to sacrifice quality of life to achieve some sustainable goal” [8]. In order to overcome this attitude, a new approach has been generated in the last decade. This new approach named hedonistic sustainability by Bjarke Ingles (2011), aims to address the limited scope of sustainable design by bridging two design methodologies- hedonistic (affective design) and sustainable design.

Keywords

Human factors Sustainability Sustainable design Affective design Hedonomics Hedonistic sustainability Ergonomics 

References

  1. 1.
    Axelsson, J.R.C., Nagamachi, M.: Concepts, Methods and Tools in Kansei Engineering, May 2004.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922021000049980
  2. 2.
    Basulto, D.: Designing a hedonistic and sustainable future. Big Think, 10 May 2011 (2011). http://bigthink.com/endless-innovation/designing-a-hedonistic-and-sustainable-future
  3. 3.
    Chang, M.-L., Lee, J.-H.: Symbiosis: creativity with affective response. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). LNAI, vol. 4562, pp. 32–41 (2007). http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-37249032473&partnerID=40&md5=8394aa924526825deff9eaac69c661b7
  4. 4.
    Chen, C.-W., Ugarte, R.C., Wu, C., Aghajan, H.: Discovering social interactions in real work environments. In Face and Gesture 2011, pp. 933–938 (2011). IEEE.  https://doi.org/10.1109/FG.2011.5771376
  5. 5.
    Demirbilek, O., Sener, B.: Product design, semantics and emotional response. Ergonomics 46(13–14), 1346–1360 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130310001610874
  6. 6.
    Desmet, P.: A multilayered model of product emotions. Hell. J. Cardiol. 54(4), 337–338 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.2752/146069203789355480
  7. 7.
    Grose, T.: Urban ski slope to raise profile of Europe’s waste- to-energy drive. National Geographic, August 2013. http://www.nationalgeographic.com
  8. 8.
    Fiore, S.M., Phillips, E., Sellers, B.C.: A transdisciplinary perspective on hedonomic sustainability design. Ergon. Des. 22(2), 22–29 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1064804613516762
  9. 9.
    Hancock, P.A., Pepe, A.A., Murphy, L.L.: Hedonomics: the power of positive and pleasurable ergonomics. Ergon. Des.: Q. Hum. Factors Appl. 13, 8–14 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1177/106480460501300104
  10. 10.
    Khalid, H.M.: Embracing diversity in user needs for affective design. Appl. Ergon. 37(4 SPEC. ISS.), 409–418 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2006.04.005
  11. 11.
    Krippendorff, K., Butter, R.: Product semantics: exploring the symbolic qualities of form (March). Industrial Design 139–140, 10–13 (1984)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lévy, P.: Beyond Kansei engineering: the emancipation of Kansei design. Int. J. Des. 7(2), 83–94 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JB006743
  13. 13.
    Lin, Y., Wei, C.: A hybrid consumer-oriented model for product affective design: an aspect of visual ergonomics, 17–29, April 2015 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20403
  14. 14.
    Lokman, A.M., Kamaruddin, K.A.: Kansei affinity cluster for affective product design. In: Proceedings - 2010 International Conference on User Science and Engineering, i-USEr 2010, pp. 38–43 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1109/IUSER.2010.5716719
  15. 15.
    McDonough, W., Braungart, M.: Cradle to Cradle. North Point Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mohtadi, T.: The complementarity of improving quality of life and reducing environmental footprints in urban spaces: the argument for “hedonistic sustainability.” Cons.: J. Sustain. Dev. 16(1), 14–28 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707749105
  17. 17.
    Grooten, M., Almond, R.E.A. (eds.): WWF. Living Planet Report - 2018: Aiming Higher. WWF, Gland, Switzerland (2018)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zande, R.V.: Creating the urban village: teaching pre-service teachers about sustainable design in architecture and community planning. Int. J. Art Des. Educ. 29(3), 321–329 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2010.01659.x

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Carleton UniversityOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations